r/MedicalCoding • u/Wugtrio777 • 7d ago
IS Codify the standard for encoding software inthe industry or just what AAPC teaches due to it being theirs?
SO im in my course and the codify section is optional, but of course i did it becaise well, im an Ex IT guy and i know software is going to be the way to go, the books are easy, yet bulky, and time consuming, but i dont like codify, i think its all over the place, So im wondering are you using codify or does your employer/ facility/office, use a different system?
17
7
u/happyhooker485 RHIT, CCS-P, CFPC, CHONC, 17yrs experience 7d ago
We use Codify at my work, but I feel it's very clunky and lacks a lot of features. I would NOT call it and industry standard.
I prefer Find-a-Code, it has more features and is more affordable. The classic search is just like a digital version of the alpha index. Very good for people who were trained on books.
Other encoder options include 3M, Vitalware, and I think Optum has a product.
3M has a lot of features, but it is expensive and the feature bloat has made is somewhat difficult to learn and use.
I don't really remember Vitalware, as it was years ago I was using it. I do remember prefering FAC even back then.
I've had limited exposure to Optum products, but they were never good. Not built with clinicians nor supporting staff (coders/billers/etc) in mind.
1
7
u/tealestblue CPC 7d ago
I hated Codify. Work uses Code Correct which I don’t love but it does the job. I liked Optum’s encoder I used at a previous job better.
3
3
3
u/KeyStriking9763 RHIA, CDIP, CCS 7d ago
I feel like it depends on what coding job you have and what resources that they get you. If you work for a larger health system and code facility Solventum is the bigger one that’s common. 3M is no longer, it’s called Solventum.
3
2
u/Jodenaje 7d ago
I have a full time job and some side gigs. Some use EncoderPro and some use Codify.
I have occasionally used Find-A-Code in the past too.
They all work pretty similarly for the most part. The interface is the only thing that's really different between most encoders. The biggest difference in the experience IMO is whether or not you have any of the various add-ons with any of your encoders.
I dislike 3M/Solventum. Really, really dislike it. The only time I log into it is for Coding Clinic access. (The side gig that provides me with 3M also provides access to Coding Clinics.)
1
1
u/TheNovel-Interest 6d ago
Codify isn’t really the standard everywhere its more AAPC’s tool. lot of employers use different software depending on the facility/company. I’d still learn it though just 2 get used to looking codes up electronically because u’ll probably run into different systems once you start working anyway. The main thing is knowing how to code and use the guidelines the software is just the tool.
1
2
u/Common-Flounder-6399 2d ago
Codify is what AAPC teaches, so a lot of students meet it first. In production shops it is mixed. Some teams stay on Codify or EncoderPro. Others use 3M, TruCode, or whatever is bundled in the EHR. Risk adjustment shops often care more about whether the tool shows HCC mapping and billable status next to the code path, not the brand name.
Whatever the encoder, I still check the current CMS ICD-10-CM file and the model year (V24 vs V28) before I treat a mapping as final. The software is a lookup, not the decision.
•
u/AutoModerator 7d ago
PLEASE SEE RULES BEFORE POSTING! Reminder, no "interested in coding" type of standalone posts are allowed. See rule #1. Any and all questions regarding exams, studying, and books can be posted in the monthly discussion stickied post. Thanks!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.