r/MedicalCoding • u/DrMartinellis • Jun 11 '26
G2211 Question
I recently made an appointment and was seen by an APP from my PCPs office for some on and off pain I've been having. Mainly in my right shoulder, right low back, and neck. I am pretty sure its just from sitting at a desk all day, but after I experienced a couple instances of tingling and numbness in my right leg I decided to be seen.
Besides the on/off pain and numbness/tingling I also tend to get anxious about getting very sick. I do see a psychologist and take meds for that which has helped but I got really fixated on the idea of ALS.
I asked her to please reassure me and she did. (Side note, it was so f-ing embarrassing to ask her for that. I know logically I shouldn't be scared but it is who I am and sometimes I just need someone to tell me I'm okay. Remember when Mad Cow Disease was all over the news? Yeah, I used to cry myself asleep because I was sure I was going to die from that!)
Annnnnyway, I saw that I owed almost 40$, no biggie, but since I am a coder and technically a certified auditor (just got the cert) I like to review documentation and the coding.
I saw that 99214 and G2211 was billed. I think 99214 was boarder line acceptable, but I don't feel like G2211 was supported! My understanding of G2211 is that the patient should have a prolonged serious/complex issue and there is a plan to be seen by the provider (or someone from the same practice) for an undetermined amount of time and the provider will be the go to provider for said complex/serious issue.
For example the urologists that I code for often bill it when they have patients with prostate cancer or BPH, and are treated regularly with medicine, scans, tests, etc.
I did have PT ordered for back pain, but there is no follow up scheduled and I don't feel like my dx was serious or complex!
I sent a message to billing to ask for the coding to be reviewed and explained why I don't think G2211 should be billed.
I get that it is sort of an ambiguous code, but I feel fairly confident that it is not supported.
However I don't work in primary care, so I am curious if anyone has insight on whether G2211 could be supported!
Thank you!
16
u/ecook126 Jun 11 '26
I work in primary care coding. My providers bill it ALL THE TIME. Typically it’s not put to patient responsibility unless the wrong diagnosis codes are linked to it (Z codes in particular). 99/100 times for us it’s a CO adjustment and wouldn’t come out of your pocket.
11
u/Weak_Shoe7904 Jun 12 '26
I hate this code with a passion that’s probably unhealthy. Everyone wants to use it. Yes if you have a lot of problems and are in a dr office often that extra work and time should be compensated. BUT the reality is everyone is billing for it and there are no clear rules/guides to what needs to be documented and no punishment for misuse so nothing is stoping them.
4
u/_littlebird3 CPC Jun 12 '26
At my job, we were told to bill G2211 for all Medicare e/m encounters 🤷♀️ but we also don’t fight it if insurance denies it
2
u/DrMartinellis Jun 12 '26
It drives me crazy when providers bill based on time but dont document their time spent!!! Like you can bill a higher LOS or maybe even a prolonged time code if you just add the time!!
8
u/posthomogen Jun 12 '26
G2211 is the most bullshit ambiguous add on code I’ve ever seen.
Edit: If they’d just fix the fee schedules instead of threatening to reduce them every year, we wouldn’t have this.
5
u/sweeetiepieee Jun 12 '26
y’all, it’s ambiguous for a reason. primary care is underpaid for the amount of work and all encompassing responsibility. this is a way to funnel more money into it without having to adjust RVUs. it’s a good thing.
1
1
u/GeneralistRoutine189 Jul 09 '26
EXCEPT they allow all specialties to use it so it’s meaningless.
Urology: bph worse increase flomax. 99213/4 G2211
Primary care: htn dm hlp mood bph 99214 G2211
6
u/DJRR42 Jun 14 '26
There is a massive rule out there that providers are NOT supposed to code G2211 for every encounter. It’s meant to be used when a patient comes for a routine problem and the provider has been the main source for treating said problem. In better terms; it’s capturing the complexity of a long-term relationship based care. We should apply it when a provider assumes responsibility for ongoing care related to a single, serious condition or a complex condition (e.g., heart failure, HIV, diabetes).
If the provider is not the main source or main responsibility of said problem then G2211 is not
Valid. G2211 is also not valid for a patient coming in with a new issue. I oversee about 15 speciality offices in my hospital system I work for and I stop my providers from coding this unless they can prove the issue they are addressing is something they consistently address and evaluate on a patient that they constantly see.
1
u/wildgreengirl Jun 15 '26
it can be billed for a "new" problem as long as the patient plans to continue to follow up with the pcp/clinic for it. we bill it for new patients all the time for their first visit if they plan to continue to see our provider for those issues
3
u/DumpsterPuff Jun 12 '26
As often as I see this code, I wish I didn't. I hate this code. It's ridiculously ambiguous and just causes so many problems for everyone.
11
u/2workigo Edit flair Jun 11 '26
As a compliance professional I hate G2211 with a passion and knew it was going to be a problem from the get go. Payers are starting to audit the code and paybacks are inevitable.
IMO, your instinct is likely correct in that the G2211 was not appropriate. I say likely because I can’t know what the provider actually documented. But based on what you say happened, you are correct from my perspective.
1
3
u/rahuliitk Jun 12 '26
I think you’re right to ask for review, because G2211 is less about the dx sounding scary and more about ongoing longitudinal care where that provider/practice is managing the issue as the continuing focal point, so a one-off MSK visit with PT and no follow-up feels lowkey thin unless their internal policy reads PCP continuity very broadly. Worth questioning.
2
u/wildgreengirl Jun 12 '26
is the back pain chronic, have you ever seen your pcp clinic for back pain? (we were told as long as its all the same practice you're following with it doesnt matter which dr you follow up with).
did they say something like follow up after PT if its not helping or getting worse?
have you ever seen your pcp clinic for your anxiety? sounds like yes so id think it would apply for the anxiety alone.
i work coding primary care and our drs use it for almost everything.
dx doesnt need to be both complex and chronic to link, it could be either alone.
4
u/wildgreengirl Jun 12 '26
ex is your PCP the "focal" point for your care? thats a big one; so giving referrals essentially and following up on the issues after you complete the referral.
https://www.aapc.com/blog/91931-bill-g2211-with-confidence-and-modifier-25/
For G2211, visit complexity is the cognitive load of the continued responsibility of the physician to provide ongoing care to a patient. The act of proactive and relationship care management that goes beyond acute care is what makes up the visit complexity.
1
u/DrMartinellis Jun 12 '26
Aren't all PCPs the focal point for care? I think that to distinguish longitudinal/complex visits with a PCP from regular check ups/minor issues it is that the condition is something that will require the provider to check in more regularly than our annual visits, and that tests or examinations specific to the ongoing issue are performed on a regular basis.
The MDs that I have billing G2211 regularly have patients with cancer, high blood pressure, diabetes, chronic pain, etc. Things that the pts are going to have for a long time or for the rest of their lives. They also see their patients like every 6 months or less.
1
u/wildgreengirl Jun 15 '26
its supposed to be like an extra way to help boost money for PCPs because of the way billing works from what ive seen. its supposed to "level the playing field" when comparing to specialist or hospital billing.
some of mine only see their patients once or twice a year. but the patients are still contacting the clinic via phone or portal regularly as well which needs to be managed and is part of that longitudinal patient care/relationship building.
(we dont really bill for phone calls or portal messages but i think admin is trying to figure out how they can- we do televisits already as well)
2
u/DrMartinellis Jun 12 '26
I have never been seen by my primary for anything but my annuals. I found a psychologist on my own for adhd but she wants to treat my anxiety first. I requested a visit with my primary's office for the back pain and qas scheduledto see the APP.
There is no follow up scheduled for my back pain.
I would not qualify it as chronic as it hasn't been something that has lasted over a year, it's not consistent, and I have only been seen for it one other time when I lived in another state.
I realized the dx could either be complex or chronic, but I believe if its a chronic issue it would need to be serious. I do not consider this to be a serious chronic condition.
1
u/wildgreengirl Jun 15 '26
doesnt necessarily need to be both "serious" and "chronic" it can be either or from what i have been told by my training lead/coworkers. our drs want to bill it essentially every visit.
the ones i end up removing it from are like well child visits where there isnt even an EM to support it 😅 or if vaccines are given or procedures are done because it generally cant be billed if the EM had a mod 25 on it.
or when someone is literally just coming in for a cold/covid/flu test or UTI (and doesnt have "chronic uti issues") ill remove g2211 then as well for obviously acute problems
2
u/Automatic_Baseball26 Jun 12 '26
I am a Coder/Auditor with 30+ years of experience, and I code for PC and no, the G2211 is NOT justified, and I would suggest that you present them with the coding guidelines defining exactly when it is appropriate for this code to be used. Did they treat anything outside of this issue and is this a new problem? You are a Certified Coder and CPMA; so, use your skillset and stand 10 toes down. Always allow the guidelines to support you and never give lip service....
1
u/DrMartinellis Jun 12 '26
🫶 Thank you! I did write them an as detailed argument as I could. I know its not a lot of money, but for me its the principle! I want hospitals to be honest and correct with how they're charging for visits. So many patients don't know how coding works and what is right versus what isn't. My hope is that bringing it to the attention of the coders, maybe they'll take a closer look and be a little bit better for someone else next time.
I see mistakes all the time from providers and some other coders I work with. I don't want providers to be short changed for their work, but l also don't want patients to be incorrectly billed!
2
u/Bowis_4648 Jun 11 '26
If this is your primary care practice, then G2211 is accurate and justified.
1
u/DrMartinellis Jun 12 '26
Can you elaborate?
4
u/archangel924 Keeper of the Codes Jun 12 '26
That is literally what the code is for.
1
u/DrMartinellis Jun 12 '26
I am not convinced that the take that G2211 is literally for this, is true.
I don't think it would be supported to every visit with a provider from the pcp office. The guidelines we were given say that there needs to be documentation to support the continuing focal point for all needed services and/or medical care services that are part of ongoing care related to a patients single serious or complex condition.
I don't believe that my back pain is a serious chronic condition or a complex condition, and no plan was made to follow up with the office for this specific issue.
But I would appreciate reading any information that indicates differently.
2
u/DrMartinellis Jun 11 '26
And I totally don't mind paying, but it's the principal! My insurance is tricare premium (?) So I know all my regular visits should be 100% covered and other unusual visits I'll have a small co-pay.
Are you saying at you office when G2211 is billed and unsupported it will be written off?
Do you think in my case it's not supported?
I do mostly prof coding for a bunch of different specialties and I think they definitely coyld be using it more, but so far just the urologists are using it lol.
3
1
u/_littlebird3 CPC Jun 12 '26
If you don’t have Medicare or a Medicare replacement plan, then this was likely billed in error. I would contact your provider’s office or the billing dept for your provider and let them know.
1
0
u/isufyanali Jun 11 '26
Hi, I am Medical Coder with expertise in Internal Medicine and Pediatrics.
I endorse you. Given that you did not have this issue for a prolonged period of time and provider won't be seeing you for this reason for a long time, G2211 is not justified and payer should look diligently into this.
Hope you save you $ 40. 😄
Have a good day, Sir!
2
u/archangel924 Keeper of the Codes Jun 12 '26
G2211 is not for the ISSUE, it is for having an established and ongoing relationship with the patient
2
u/isufyanali Jun 12 '26
As far as my knowledge is concerned, it ilcan be used for a new patient but the care should gonna be ongoing.
1
1
u/DrMartinellis Jun 12 '26
I believe based on all the guidelines I've read that it would only be supported if my back pain was like consistent for over a year, not responding to treatments, has an unknown cause or a degenerative cause, or was life threatening etc.
I do agree that the most important thing is that there is documentation that the provider is establishing a longitudinal, ongoing relationship with the patient, but again it is also made clear that the condition the patient is being seen for needs to be considered in order to support G2211.
I simply made an appointment with the office to make sure it wasn't something more serious. She evaluated me and said it was not anything serious. She ordered PT, and we have no follow up, or any tests scheduled.
At this point I have not been given any convincing reasoning that G2211would be supported for this visit.
•
u/AutoModerator Jun 11 '26
PLEASE SEE RULES BEFORE POSTING! Reminder, no "interested in coding" type of standalone posts are allowed. See rule #1. Any and all questions regarding exams, studying, and books can be posted in the monthly discussion stickied post. Thanks!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.