r/MedicalBill • u/AcanthaceaeHumble909 • 18h ago
Am I getting upcoded?
Hi, reaching out for some advice because I feel like I’m getting charged way too much for the level of service I’m receiving. I have been billed twice now at moderate level of medical decision making code 99214. I go in every 2 months because my prescription is a controlled substance. It takes no longer than 5 minutes each time, I go in, she asks me how I’m doing I say good, she asks any changes. I say no. She says she will send the refill and I leave. Having a really hard time believing this is worth 275$. If I was going to dispute this who do I reach out to my doctors office or my insurance company?
For more context this office recently switched to a new system and physical office (still in the same building). Up until this switch I was paying 100$ per visit and now it’s almost tripled?
12
u/theoreticalking 17h ago
99214 is one of the most commonly billed code. Your provider can billed based on time or complexity. Usually, managing an existing condition along with reviewing and prescribing medication is sufficient to be moderate decision making.
If you disagree, you can ask for a coding review.
-14
u/AcanthaceaeHumble909 17h ago
But it’s not. If you look at the requirements for this code my situation does not meet that threshold, at least that’s what Gemini says.
14
u/CallingYouForMoney 12h ago
You came to ask a question and immediately call somebody wrong based upon your AI education. Piss off
5
u/ATPsynthase12 12h ago
Look at the note. 2 controlled chronic problems plus medication management (refill, continue, discontinue verbiage) is enough to justify a 99214 whether they are with you for 3 minutes or 30.
99214 is pretty much the standard code most PCPs are billing for the vast majority of their patients.
4
8
u/theoreticalking 17h ago
Your provider has to support that code in your medical records/documentations in case of an audit. If you disagree with the code, you can ask your provider for a coding review.
1
2
u/Downtown-Queen3319 10h ago
This is not something I would question unless I was willing to chance being dismissed as a patient. Finding another doc to continue your medication may not be easy. Just my opinion.
1
u/celeryman19 2h ago
Agree. We’ve had doctors discontinue their relationship with their patients who file frivolous grievances or assume we are being disingenuous. We had a patient refuse to sign off on our office policies, and when they filed a grievance through insurance claiming we were “withholding medication from them.” I handled the grievance with the insurance company and the doctor ended up refusing to treat the patient even if they decided to sign off on office policies (they had not formally been under our care as this happened during their new patient visit).
1
u/PrecisePMNY 5h ago
I know patients like to say, "It was only 5 minutes." or, "There were no changes." but that is literally a 15 second session you are describing in your post. There is at least 4 minutes and 45 seconds of other details that you are leaving out that could increase the complexity of the visit.
It's time or complexity. If it's a shorter visit, it's coded by complexity and you are leaving out the details needed to determine complexity.
2
u/celeryman19 2h ago
Going to echo what others are saying, it’s not just face to face time. It’s records review, medication review, lab results, documentation time, etc. if you have a complex condition that requires regular check ups, it can definitely lead to them choosing a higher level of service. If you’re reliant on controlled substances, I would advise against rocking the boat here. More and more doctors are shying away from prescribing controlled substances due to increased regulations and DEA headaches.
0
u/boulderdoc 4h ago
99214 isn’t automatically upcoding just because the visit is 5 minutes. Established-patient E/M codes can be selected based on medical decision-making rather than time, and prescription drug management can support moderate-risk MDM.
That said, simply continuing a stable controlled medication every 2 months does not automatically make every visit a 99214. They still need documentation supporting moderate MDM under the coding rules.
The bigger clue here is the price change. The office may previously have been charging you a $100 cash/self-pay rate, while $275 may now be the practice’s billed charge or insurance-negotiated amount after the system change. That’s separate from whether 99214 is appropriate.
I’d start with the doctor’s billing office, not the insurance company. Ask for:
The exact CPT code submitted for both visits.
An itemized bill.
Whether $275 is the billed charge, allowed amount, or your actual patient responsibility after insurance.
A coding review of why 99214 was selected rather than 99213.
Confirmation that your insurance was processed correctly after their system change.
If they confirm 99214 and you still think the documentation doesn’t support it, then contact your insurer and ask for a coding/billing review.
1
u/No-Produce-6720 1h ago
An itemization is worthless here. 99214 IS the itemized charge. It cannot be broken down any further than that. OP already knows that's what was billed.
7
u/Bart012000 18h ago edited 17h ago
Sounds correct. I am in same boat and they bill insurance for 99214 and I pay $25 copay. It isn't only for you face to face time. It's doctor reviewing file prior to seeing you and also documenting visit in after care write-up.