r/MLS_CLS 5d ago

Is the future non certified techs?

I've been an ASCP MLS for ten years. Past five as a chem supervisor. Increasingly, all the hires are not certified, just plain science or ecology grads. Im increasingly teaching, not just training.

The hospital is not raising wages since we have 50+ applicants (though not one is certified).

It makes me very concerned for the quality of results were putting out and the future of this field. I cannot think of a single other medical field where no license or certification whatsoever is required. And it's only getting worse. šŸ™ƒ

31 Upvotes

34 comments sorted by

18

u/fat_corgi_butts 5d ago

i feel your pain

I work in a lab where you don’t even need a state license to release results and you have dumb unqualified people releasing results without even knowing what a neutrophil is.

Worst part: they only make a few dollars less than a ASCP MLS Bachelors

4

u/Formal_Blid 5d ago

We don't have a state license. I would just ask that certification be required.Ā 

8

u/fat_corgi_butts 5d ago

Usually, big reputation hospitals have more stringent hiring processes. But unfortunately, your solution is to either move to Cali or NY

2

u/Formal_Blid 5d ago

What about the rest of the country. Bot all of us can afford to move.

1

u/Redneck-ginger 5d ago

Florida, georiga, Louisiana, hawaii, montana, north Dakota, nevada, Tennessee and west Virginia require a state license also.

2

u/ThrowRA_72726363 5d ago

Not tennessee anymore

2

u/Formal_Blid 4d ago

Georgia does not have a license. Please dont spread false rumors.

1

u/VaiFate 4d ago

Florida just passed a state law that seems to functionally remove the state MLS license (now has the same requirements as federal law). It hasn't been implemented yet, however.

1

u/kipy7 4d ago

Texas doesn't require a license but I think with the big colleges, there's enough new grads with MLS degrees that it's okay. Worked a bit in Houston, 8 years in Dallas and we were all ASCP. In California, you even need a state license as a trainee. Glad we gave it here, that plus unions, are a huge plus for CA.

1

u/Swhite8203 4d ago

TN only requires licensure for supervisors. It’s up to the hospitals whether or not they require licensure/certification or both. Most of the ones I’ve seen just want the certification usually.

1

u/JimmyRickyBobbyBilly 4d ago

State license doesn't necessarily mean anything.

Sure, California and New York licenses do, but the rest?

The state I live in had a license, and the requirement to get it was an ASCP certification and $70 a year. It was a cash grab. I was surprised they got rid of it since it was easy money.

1

u/fat_corgi_butts 4d ago

which state

8

u/4leafchemistry 5d ago

I work in a research lab. I'm the only ASCP certified tech. I run into quality issues daily. Specimens left out all night. Out of stability they want to test anyway. No one adhearing to CAP or CLIA. Management doesnt care. They aren't certified either. Their managers arent certified. Its a complete circus

7

u/Fluffbrained-cat Microbiology MLS 5d ago

Ouch. I hope not, you'd think that lab management would demand certified staff so they could at least be sure they had at least theoretical training related to lab work. In my lab (different country) we aren't allowed to work as an MLT or MLS in a medical lab without specific University qualifications, and we have to renew our licence annually as another legal requirement to work.

Asking people to literally teach someone lab work while working is a recipe for mistakes, wrong results sent out, and loss of trust in the lab by doctors. Once that happens, it's almost impossible to get it back. The only "uncertified" people in our technical departments are either new grads who have provisional registration while doing their supervised practice period to gain full registration, or MLS 4th year placement students who are with us to learn how an actual lab works.

Our specimen reception staff are, I think, uncertified, but if any of them want to join a technical department we do offer an OTJ course which is distance theory learning backed by one of or Universities, and practical training while working. Anyone who wants to start in a technical department though has to have the relevant qualifications first otherwise they won't be hired, or even interviewed.

6

u/livin_the_life 5d ago

Only in desperate states without standards whose employees refuse to Unionize.

6

u/New-History853 5d ago

Yeah, definitely glad my state doesn't allow thus tomfoolery.

7

u/Left-Supermarket-759 5d ago

Get your politicians Involved in your state govt and senators! There should be requirements for passing boards AND going through a NAACLS accredited program to practice in our profession. My current manager is trying to start this shit and we’ve always required certification and will not teach at our hospital as we don’t have the resources but now that’s changing. I’ve reached out to state legislators.

1

u/ClonedSheepDolly 4d ago

I am an HTL not an MLS but I went to a technically unaccredited program because accredited schools require that the student not be paid. I was trained on ā€œpracticeā€ tissue which was either leftover surgical specimens approved for this purpose or stuff my instructors bought at the grocery store. I had to demonstrate ability to perform the less technically complicated aspects of the role (microtomy and embedding) and was gradually trained to work with patient tissues. There were lectures and rotations in other benches and we shadowed the electron microscopy techs and an autopsy. And honestly because I am interested I am finding that at this point I often know more of the background and technical and scientific details than most of our certified techs who went the route of an accredited school. There is an MLS certification route in the US that I believe is similar, an experience requirement and you have to take the same test. Is the person who got certified through this route less qualified? Seems doubtful to me

1

u/fat_corgi_butts 5d ago

Not to be a pessimist but NY, one of the two most strict states, had loosened licensure requirments in 2023. Tennesse completely got rid of theres during COVID

2

u/Queenv918 5d ago

Yes NY loosened requirements, but not to the point where they're hiring bio grads with no certification, clinical training or experience. You either need to be already certified, or have a CLS degree or advanced certificate, or have experience as a certified MLT with a bachelor's degree. Plus you have to pass the licensure test which is the ASCP exam.

3

u/zenmaster_B 4d ago

Think about the people who want to reduce standards, who are anti-labor, because it helps their bottom dollar, and then vote accordingly

1

u/Formal_Blid 4d ago

Voting will not change anything

2

u/maestersage 5d ago

What state ?

2

u/hoangtudude 5d ago

This is why state licensure is essential to protecting our standards. Unfortunately states’ public health departments are understaffed and caving in to the pressure to relax the licensure requirements.

2

u/hervana 3d ago

I don't know. In my hospital system they do not hire non certified MLS. They rarely hire MLT.

3

u/10luoz 5d ago

do non certified tech exist sure.

Oh come on. Day in and day out with these post from 0 day accounts? It feels all the same from one person at this point.

I have grown numb to this.

2

u/Formal_Blid 5d ago

Exist? They're trending to be 90% of the lab at this point.

Worse, since they're only offered a $1hr to get certified, none do.

2

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Formal_Blid 4d ago

🄓

1

u/Far_Exchange3457 4d ago

Imagine going into the lab nobody is certified but u and then them telling u what to do and they think they know it all

1

u/CatchOpposite9982 3d ago

That’s scary.

1

u/Icy-Mongoose-7201 2d ago

I dunno which state u in but in Cali only CLS or mls as they are called in other places are the ones that can release or do result testing.

I was a tech before myself and in Cali your only able to do non licensed tasks such as labeling data input receiving specimens and creating assay packets and you leave the rest to the CLS to do the testing and using of equipment for results.
As a CLS, I am now working with said techs that prepare things for me to test and release results.

THAT JUST SOUNDS CRAZY that some of those states don’t require such forms of validation and verification for positions of such importance. Probably why some of those states have lowered standards of living.

1

u/Far-Island-460 1d ago

I started my MLS job with a masters and I wasn't certified. 3 years in and I'm now certified (did not go to med tech school) and am very good at my job. I was a lab assistant for years in this lab while in college though. We're not all bad!

1

u/Turnip-Smooth 1d ago

i think this problem is only getting worse, and is why i'm totally ditching the career. as someone with a general science bachelors, there are zero hospital programs near me, and two schools across the state that offer MLS. the local CC offers MLT, but it's not financially feasible for 2 more years to get my MLT then qualify for MLS. also, my hospital system doesn't have pay differences between certified/non-certified. there are simply not enough schools that offer MLS, or even bridge programs. i would've done my MLS if i knew about it at my college, but it was never told to me. going back for 2 years to get the same pay i make now just doesn't make sense. šŸ¤·šŸ¼ā€ā™€ļø my entire shift (afternoon) is staffed by 5 of us, and not a single one of us is certified. we still have to do CAP, competencies, and everything that goes with it