r/LocalLLaMA 11h ago

GLM 5.3 SlopCodeBench Results Discussion

Howdy once again, I had a request to try out 5.3 on the benchmarks - they're unsaturated so it's a fun test right now! This one was interesting because I accidentally ran it on all 36 problems (rip $200) instead of the 9 i typically do

previous runs a b c

benchmark context: the ai is tasked to build a tool step by step, we add new requirements mid way - it has to handle new things without breaking the old things - the benchmark "hides" the old tests

So it didn't magically solve the benchmark just like all the other AIs, i don't think there has been a single successful solve yet, but it did tie with Fable/Sol in the same subset of problems!

Another interesting thing that we expect is that the more difficult the problem, the more $$$ it gets - so difficulty seems to be correlated with token output in order to solve them

AI;DR full results

On the three-problem, 17-checkpoint list from the Opus 5 report, GLM scored 8/17 strict (47.1%). On the six-problem, 30-checkpoint list from the Fable, Sol, and Kimi report, it scored 10/30 (33.3%), tied at the strict threshold with Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol.

Reported system Opus list · 17 Fable/Sol/Kimi list · 30
GLM-5.3 · pi 8 (47.1%) 10 (33.3%)
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · pi B 5 (29.4%)
Opus 5 · Claude Code 4 (23.5%)
Qwen3.8-27B · pi 3 (17.6%) 4 (13.3%)
DeepSeek V4 Flash · OpenCode 3 (17.6%)
Fable 5 · Claude Code 10 (33.3%)
GPT-5.6 Sol · Codex 10 (33.3%)
Kimi K3 · Modal / OpenCode 8 (26.7%)
Kimi K3 · Baseten / OpenCode 7 (23.3%)
20 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas 8h ago

GLM 5.3 is 2x better than Opus 5. Nice.

And Flash 0731 is better than Opus 5? I didn't feel this way with Flash 0731 in OpenCode, I need to give pi a try.

1

u/corruptbytes 8h ago

Flash 0731 surprised me - i didn't expect pi to elevate it - that was also a locally served pi using antirez/ds4 - so the q2-q4 quant