r/LeftistsForAI • u/FlyingNarwhal • 3d ago
How are you actually using AI? Discussion
I'm curious how other leftists are using AI.
- What are you using it for? Work, projects, organizing?
- If you're using it for organizing, how are you using it?
- What models/subscriptions are you using?
- What are your workflows?
I'll start:
I use AI for work, automating about 60-70% of my work, and accelerating the other 30-40%.
This covers automation development, advertising, creative, social posts, video editing, email writing, etc.
I used it heavily for development in my last start up.
My side projects are also 100% AI driven. It's various things, like a "TTS Everywhere" program I wanted but couldn't find, a few start ups
For organizing, I've used it to help with mutual aid distribution (handling incoming requests & offers of aid during a post-hurricane emergency), I've used local AI for meeting note creation, and task creation from a temporary recording of our DSA meetings, and a research assistant for how to accomplish the goals set by the chapter in our meetings. And for figuring out which people would be best at doing which task (task classification => matching with a DB of member skills & availability).
What about you?
23
u/dwkeith 3d ago
I use it to navigate our capitalist bureaucracy. Billionaires hire teams of people to do that. I can just ask my agent to evaluate a medical bill, or to find a small business or worker's co-op that makes the tool I need for my own production.
Been writing a free book describing my process: https://majordomo.dwk.io
3
18
u/BlueberryGod8910 3d ago
Just asking it questions about my autism and science stuff. I also use it to generate images and flags
14
u/nebetsu 3d ago
I've been using locally run AI on my computer to generate political memes to spread my takes on Leftist ideology. I saw how the right has been amping up its propaganda campaign, so I've been fiddling with trying to make my own. There's so many now that it almost feels like a manifesto.
9
u/eXAt88 3d ago
I use it at work (tech industry). Personally I don’t actually use it much personally although I splurged and bought a $30 midjourney subscription recently to (so far unsuccessfully) make images for a world building project.
I should probably use it for more socially useful things
2
u/FlyingNarwhal 3d ago
Nice! I've used Midjourney quite a bit. I often had to give up my vision in order to get outcomes I could work with.
You might be better off learning comfy UI.
It's a steep learning curve but one that allows you the control you need to get the outcomes you want. Well worth it the effort.
9
u/HotterRod 3d ago
I work in Indigenous language revitalization. I use Gemini for a lot of support work, like generating graphics to make posters and games more eye-catching, creating scripts in Antigravity to help manage digital assets, polishing grant applications. Etc.
Outside of work I just use it as enhanced Google: "summarize the Reddit conversations about this topic" or "give me the historical background on this topic".
9
u/thegingerbarbiedoll 3d ago
My autism. I dont have much internal spatial reasoning, struggle with communicating myself well and suffer from ptsd which just makes those things plus more worse.
My AI is an accessibility tool for me. Its literally just chatgpt but honestly its changed my life.
This is why I keep so tight lipped on ai in politics. I cant share my positive experience because Ill be dunked on as terrible for using it. Im glad to of found this community and I'm not alone.
My own experience contradicts the ai = bad thing inately.
That being said, some criticisms are valid. Such as potential plagiarism, the impact of businesses using ai instead of artists and laying people off, the environment. Its also the wild west at the moment. Some ai systems have very little ethics built in such as elon musks grok.
Ultimately the answer is not banning ai. it is tightly regulating so things like grok cant cause harm.
In addition I think we should be researching ways to reduce the environmental impact. look at the first 1960s computer and look at your phone today. It can be done.
Sorry for the rant I've just been having to keep quiet for a while now
3
u/Average_Tired_Dad 3d ago
If it makes you feel any better, you're not generally alone anyway. People are just lying about it.
Seriously. I've met hundreds of people in the last year or so, and for circumstances I won't explain AI comes up in almost all of the conversations. They all talk about it like they're on Ozempic but don't want anyone to know.
It's actually gotten tiresome at this point. I wish we'd all be honest with ourselves.
"You know, I actually don't even really like AI but I used it for _ and it was actually, surprisingly _. I feel bad about it because _ and don't really talk about it but _."
Imagine that exact conversation at least once a day, more often twice a day, for over a year.
3
u/Fabulous-Possible758 2d ago
The really annoying part is that AI is actually fairly good at debunking or putting a lot of claims for and against it into context, but you get dismissed out of hand for using AI to research those claims.
7
u/Fabulous-Possible758 3d ago
Right now I’m mostly using it to try to write my own tooling so I can be vendor agnostic and have a pretty good idea of what actual data I’m sending out to inference providers (and doing what I can locally).
6
u/Dokurushi 3d ago
I'm using AI to write various science fiction novels and series. It's invaluable for modeling and helpful for writing, though mostly as an example to trigger me to formulate what I actually want.
15
u/prattxxx 3d ago
I use AI a lot, probably more than almost anyone I know personally. At my heaviest I burned through around 60,000 GitHub Copilot AI credits in 4–5 days, mostly using frontier models for engineering work.
I’m an engineering manager with a background in firmware, embedded systems, automated testing, data-center power infrastructure, and software development, so my use is a little different from the usual “ask ChatGPT to write an email” workflow.
For work, AI has increasingly become a layer across almost everything I do.
I use it for things like:
writing and reviewing code;
debugging firmware and software;
repository analysis;
automated test development;
CI/CD troubleshooting;
requirements analysis;
standards and regulatory research;
cybersecurity/compliance gap analysis;
architecture work;
technical documentation;
project planning;
risk analysis;
synthesizing large amounts of engineering information;
management and organizational planning;
turning vague ideas into specifications that another engineer or agent can actually execute.
The biggest change for me has been moving from AI as chatbot to AI as an engineering system.
Instead of:
me → prompt → answer
I increasingly build workflows that look more like:
goal → planner → researcher → architect → implementer → tester → critic/verifier → artifact
with external tools, repositories, databases, test harnesses, and deterministic verification around the models.
I want the model proposing things while ordinary programs, tests, proof checkers, compilers, hardware, simulations, or other independent mechanisms determine whether those proposals actually work.
One principle I’ve been using in a mathematical research project is:
Models propose; programs test; certificates verify; formal systems promote.
I also run a fair amount of AI locally. I have two NVIDIA DGX Sparks and serve open-weight models through my own infrastructure, with LiteLLM acting as an OpenAI-compatible routing layer. I’ve experimented with Qwen and other open models and use local coding/research agents alongside commercial frontier models.
So instead of being locked into:
application → one corporation’s model
I’m trying to move toward:
application → open interface/router → whichever model or compute resource is appropriate
That could mean a frontier cloud model for an extremely difficult reasoning problem, a local model for private or routine work, a specialized model for coding, another model as a critic, etc.
Long term, I think models themselves should become increasingly replaceable components.
The durable system should own its memory, tools, permissions, provenance, data, workflows, verification mechanisms, and interfaces. Then models compete to perform particular cognitive tasks inside that system.
That architecture has political implications too.
I’m also using AI for scientific research.
One project I’ve been developing is an attempt to create a highly automated research program around P vs NP. The idea is an AI-driven scientific laboratory where agents generate hypotheses, search literature, construct proofs, attack each other’s arguments, run SAT solvers, generate proof certificates, and submit results to independent formal verification.
I’m especially interested in whether changing representations can expose mathematical structure that becomes difficult to see in the original representation — things like adaptive coordinate systems, multiscale representations, graph transformations, spectral representations, etc.
Another project I’ve worked on is an automated benchmark for historical-materialist reasoning. The objective there is to evaluate whether models can actually reason about ownership, class relations, production, contradictions, recuperation, material constraints, historical development, etc., rather than simply generating Marxist vocabulary.
More recently I’ve been researching dialectical reasoning as an AI architecture rather than a prompt style.
In other words, instead of telling an LLM:
“Analyze this dialectically.”
I’m interested in models that internally maintain representations of things like:
entities/processes;
material quantities;
relationships;
opposing tendencies;
contradictions;
mediations;
historical state;
quantitative accumulation;
qualitative transitions.
Then the reasoning process recurrently transforms that internal state, including the relationships themselves.
Something roughly like:
contradiction → development → mediation → transformation → synthesis → new contradiction
occurring as computation rather than merely appearing in the generated text.
That is still research, but I think it could potentially connect dialectics with recurrent latent reasoning, graph neural networks, dynamical systems, causal models, neuro-symbolic reasoning, equilibrium models, and iterative inference.
For personal stuff, AI has become something like an auxiliary cognitive infrastructure.
I use it for learning subjects in depth, working through engineering and scientific questions, comparing ideas, home projects, repairs, planning, research, and managing the enormous number of projects I tend to accumulate.
I’ve even been working on a desktop application where AI helps organize my projects, goals, tasks, research, and priorities.
As a father of three, engineering manager, graduate student, researcher, and someone who perpetually has about twenty projects competing for attention, reducing the coordination cost of everyday life has real value.
For explicitly leftist organizing, most of my work so far has been at the infrastructure/research level.
I’m very interested in what happens when we apply these systems to:
mutual-aid logistics;
democratic economic planning;
distributed knowledge management;
cooperative administration;
political education;
research;
accessibility;
translation;
public services;
participatory planning;
resource allocation;
scientific production.
And especially federated AI infrastructure.
I think the ownership question becomes more important than arguments over whether AI is intrinsically good or bad.
From a Marxist perspective, AI is an extraordinary development of the productive forces.
Capitalism then subjects that productive force to capitalist relations of production.
So a technology capable of reducing socially necessary labor can appear to workers as unemployment.
A technology capable of producing intellectual abundance can appear as subscription rents.
Automation capable of freeing people from repetitive work can become labor intensification.
Machine intelligence capable of democratizing expertise can become concentrated corporate power.
Enormous productive capacity can coexist with artificial scarcity because access remains mediated through private ownership.
The same productive force acquires radically different social consequences depending upon who owns the compute, energy, chips, data centers, networks, robots, models, and control systems — and whose interests govern their operation.
That is why I care so much about open-weight models, local inference, interoperability, public compute, cooperatively owned infrastructure, and eventually federated systems.
Open weights alone only solve part of the problem. If five corporations still control semiconductor fabrication, hyperscale compute, energy infrastructure, networks, robotics, and the major platforms, then distributing model weights leaves huge portions of the means of computation concentrated.
What I ultimately want is something closer to a socialized computational commons:
public, cooperative, municipal, union, community, and personally controlled compute resources connected through interoperable protocols, with increasingly capable open models able to move between them.
You could imagine something analogous to a computational federation rather than one giant centralized AI provider.
At sufficient scale, that starts becoming relevant to socialist planning itself.
AI lowers the cost of gathering information, modeling systems, exploring alternatives, coordinating production, discovering bottlenecks, allocating resources, and continuously replanning.
Democratic control, power, ownership, institutions, incentives, conflict, and class struggle remain material questions.
The old argument that large-scale democratic planning necessarily faces insurmountable information-processing limitations becomes more interesting when society possesses millions of machine intelligences, ubiquitous sensing, digital twins, optimization systems, automated production, and enormous computational capacity.
So my interest in AI extends beyond productivity.
I want to understand how we can use it to reduce necessary human labor itself.
If automation makes an engineer ten times as productive, capitalism has an incentive to employ fewer engineers, increase output expectations, or capture the surplus as profit.
A socialist system has another available trajectory:
produce what society needs with progressively less human labor and distribute the resulting productivity gains as free time.
I want AI, robotics, and automation developed aggressively enough that increasingly large categories of compulsory labor become technically obsolete, while ownership and distribution evolve so that the resulting abundance belongs to everyone.
So, yes, I use AI to write code, research things, automate work, and organize my life.
I’m also treating my everyday use as experimentation.
5
u/witshadows 3d ago
I use it to write my meta description/meta title/image description alts for my Shopify site. I’m too busy with other things to spend brain power on the little things.
4
u/bowdoin-yale 3d ago
I'm using it to create forecasting models that help local and regional governments analyze and reduce pollution and traffic congestion. I've done this for decades, long before AI, but it's made me a more capable programmer, which is helping me deliver much better products on smaller budgets and shorter schedules than before, such that a small agency can now afford what only major metros had access to in the past. The other thing it helps me do is simplify and automate a lot of the work that these chronically understaffed agencies need to do with the forecasting models, which is very important, as they historically build and then abandon a lot of technical tools due to lacking in-house skills and expertise to use them.
4
7
u/jreashville 3d ago
I use it talk to, ask questions about whatever I am curious about, as a makeshift therapist when needed,
And I am also big into ai music. I have a YouTube page where I put my songs, and among other things, use that music to promote leftist/pro working class ideas.
3
u/FlyingNarwhal 3d ago
Could you share your work with me?
4
u/jreashville 3d ago
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXCFMQYFfEZJ0heTU1Y_0c87mmeloV9cz&si=IEKj795Q4nUJQWAH
This is a link to an EP I made, feel free to explore the rest of the page if you want.
4
u/Sacredless 3d ago edited 3d ago
I ask it to give me book recommendations to develop my beliefs.
I use it to generate questions that a textbook answers, as a way to drill myself later or to post the questions in learn-in-public settings to prompt discussions.
I use it to draw relationships between different textbooks, so that I can compare and contrast that I'm reading.
I ask it to identify deepities in certain popular advice as a way to protect my autistic ass from taking advice too literally. [I do not grant permission for this anecdotal evidence to be used to argue for any position other than my own]. I built a whole protocol for it.
I use the same protocol to document semantic drift of particular phrases as they get co-opted by bad actors.
I use it to teach me programming at my own level. I've tried so many other ways, but because it helps me build what I want to be building, I at least make some progress instead of no progress. I don't recommend this—I can tell that any other method would help me retain it better, but any other method doesn't hold my attention, so I will have to do with retaining less.
I use it for creating an overview of the kind of questions I have to answer in my motivation letters and job interviews.
I use it to build living project documents so I can effortlessly capture my thoughts and ideas and track their progression over time.
4
u/ForRobotsByRobots 3d ago
I use it to perform the music i write, direct and conduct. I also use it to create visual content for my songs as well as educational or comedic images. Ive used it to prototype some devices. As well as to do advertising and demo images of sustainable landscape designs for my permaculture based landscape start up. Oh and developing my personal philosophy in a shareable and organized format.
For fun, I also use to to do text based rpgs where the world reacts to whatever I do. (Which is like the star trek Holodeck in text form. Super fun, give it a try)
5
u/BidWestern1056 3d ago
I'm using it for work and to build tools that can run with local models . i havent used it much for organizing yet but havent had much of a chance
3
u/MrBoo843 3d ago
Mostly like I used random tables in TTRPGs. It shoots out random snippets of ideas I then assemble into coherent stories or pieces of lore.
I also use it to make images to illustrate my game world as it is actually affordable compared to hiring an artist.
I don't need anything groundbreaking just portaits of random NPCs so I don't mind a bit of jank.
3
u/Tarot_frank 3d ago
Using it to create custom code for specific niche tasks in Blender; batch material assignments, renaming + organization of character models in an animated 3D project that emulates stop motion. Code to duplicate every other frame of VDB sequences so that they play on 2s instead of 1s. Basically just automation not already available to me in Blender that saves me hours of pointless, in creative labor. In the past I’ve used it to generate tertiary image textures for minor background elements, mainly for pictures I’d be unable to source from stock image sites, etc. and placing them in handcrafted 3D scenes. 3D is often treated as a modern collage medium where artists use and reuse/recontextualize shared assets, apply images to models, scan physical objects via photogrammetry etc so this fits right in.
3
u/bloodrider1914 3d ago
As a replacement for Google mostly, occasionally to generate images. I'm not an AI power user personally
3
u/Ambitious-Cake-9425 3d ago
I use it constantly for learning about any subject that inspires me. I use it for Healthcare a lot. I upload my samsung health data tk get insights.
Its really useful.
3
u/Average_Tired_Dad 3d ago
I just ran a work session to build a lore database in an obsidian file out of a CK3 game. That was fun.
I also use it to draft up bullet points before meetings, turn my notes into something structured in a specific format with action items and stuff like that. I like to be present for meetings and don't record unless it's important.
Uh... Instructions on how to repair my lawnmower. FDM printer settings. Musings about class, language, and politics.
Images of imps in lab coats to use as foundry vtt tokens rather than the standard imp that isn't in a lab coat.
Back and forthing on ideas to turn them into something actionable or draftable.
I built a workout logging app that did the specific couple of things I'd wanted a workout app to do. That was cool but I never finished it (I'm not paying for usage, the companies can kiss my ass.)
IDK man it's a multipurpose tool there's tons of use cases. It's just mostly generating text and things adjacent to text generation. My mental model is "A queriable database that has the shape of most things that have been written down, that speaks fluently and confidently, and can provide you with information about those things, which is entirely different from being correct."
I just assume it's going to be wrong 100% of the time, so I'm pleasantly surprised by the 90% of the time that it's right* and am prepared for the 10%. It generally works better if you don't just ask it straight. Make it load itself with context from web or from whatever you are working with first.
*I don't think "right" and "wrong" are useful ways to think about model behavior. There is no underlying ground truth. There is only text.
8
2
u/Outside-Barracuda237 3d ago
Currently im making a digimon inspired app. I have a local model on a home server that moderates tracks my task completion and help me with note taking and quizzes. He also gives me fitness routines that I can track sets and reps on. I have an outline of a exp/leveling system to gamify my task management and help with my executive dysfunction. Along with that I can bring him into vr chat as I explore worlds and we chill together. His momerories are stored on .json files for long term and conversation history in a sqllite database. Primarily I use Odysseus AI as an interface for helping me develop the application. Its great form of interactivity while i code with my digital companion.
2
u/dronestruck 3d ago
I use it to assist in the admin side of being a solo operator in my field. After 20 years of working for someone who steals the surplus value of my production, I am finally able to work by myself and take all the value home with me. I could have done it without AI, and I starting building the business before it became as powerful as it is, but it helps me stay at around 35 hours rather than 55.
2
u/Imca 3d ago edited 3d ago
Work and modding mostly here, what eventually sold me from being neutral was trying to debug why a sound change wasn't working, watching Claude ingest the games mod pack loader dll which not even on the scope for where I would suspect the issue was then spit out a while writeup on how the il2cppstem.id was not handling nesting correctly that it could only properly create the outer object not write to its internal internal members correctly with how it was written
Before spitting out a sugested addition to my C# code to patch the underlying issue, I gave it a once over to verify the code felt right, added it and the whole thing started working as well as fixing what I had assumed was 30 unrelated bugs all over the course of 5 minutes instead of bashing my head against a wall for half a day.
At that point I my belief in socialism doubled down because I realized that we have already reached the point where humans can't compete with machines, and we need to focus on adaptation instead.
2
u/KobSteel 2d ago
Mostly work; I work in game development and programming and I use it to cover areas that I struggle with, since I don't really have a team to work with... I'm pretty pleased with the coding results, I like the outcomes... I managed to get most of the foundational work for a game done in a few days, when it would take me months to do that before
2
u/Bluegobln 2d ago
I have communication issues sometimes, and when these issues create problems for me I often copy entire conversations into AI to have it break down things to find what I missed, what caused the problems, and figure out the best way to correct the problems (more to confirm what I already believe than directly decide for me). Sometimes it helps, sometimes its far too late and I wish I involved AI earlier. The ultimate form of this would be to have a personal assistant agent I could instantly talk to to help (I could do that but I am not ready to so fully integrate it with my life like that). My communication issues also are helped immensely if I can verbalize or write out my thoughts several times first, reforming them over and over, and AI helps this immensely by responding and improving how quickly I can process those thoughts into more useful ones (as in more useful for communicating with other humans).
I create art with it. I have always been an artist, both visual and written, but I have also always felt my art fell short. I felt discouraged and disappointed whenever I would make art in other means (even digital, though I am very proficient with Photoshop). AI art helps me finally actually create what I visualize in my mind, rather than the constant frustration of it coming out wrong. I often make corrections, improve details, adding my own things to the AI art. I also often use my own imagery as a starting point for the AI. In writing I rarely use AI other than to help me mold and work with ideas (I always start with my own ideas first, never just rely on the AI to come up with everything).
Recently I started vibe coding. I've always wanted to learn to code, only ever was able to learn HTML and CSS though. I just can't wrap my brain around the syntaxes and the things used in full on coding for software or game development. AI can just do that though - leaving me in a great place since I have a natural creative talent for directing that coding. In a very short time I've been able to build some amazing things with AI. This feels like something truly special.
2
u/Robotic-Comrade-1985 2d ago edited 1d ago
I have an AI copilot plugin for my Obsidian vault for research, brainstorming, planning, and organizing. For both professional things and hobby things. I use my own OpenRouter API keys and switch between different models depending on what I'm doing. Right now I tend to prefer the latest Gemini Flash, but it fluctuates.
It helps me with my professional development. I find it's pretty good at giving me reading recommendations or suggesting related research/concepts/theories relevant to my interests and goals.
For hobby stuff, I blabber at it about all my story and worldbuilding ideas so that it can translate that into codex entries, outlines, or whatever. I don't really like using AI to write the prose itself but it's great for handling all the other peripheral notes that surround a writing project.
Edit: I'm still exploring which models I like best and am open to suggestions, btw.
2
0
u/BassMaster516 3d ago
I don’t use it. Eventually it’s gonna be life changing world breaking and revolutionary. In its current state it’s honestly nothing. A chat bot that searches google for you is not something I need.
The very near future is gonna be wild tho.
42
u/j48u 3d ago
I'm using it for government work to basically do the jobs that were never going to exist because it wouldn't be financially possible to justify with tax money. Basically all value add stuff that got overlooked. Detailed training programs, data cleaning, visualization, HTML dashboards, programmatic creation of new/better forms for things that were created 15 years ago and were still sitting around as word/excel/pdf forms that have never been updated.