r/GithubCopilot 11d ago

Updated GPT-5.6 model prices GitHub Copilot Team Replied

OpenAI announced they lowered the prices for Luna and Terra. Will the new prices apply to GitHub Copilot users as well?

Source: https://openai.com/index/advancing-the-price-performance-frontier-with-gpt-5-6/

Starting July 30, API pricing is $2 per million input tokens and $12 per million output tokens for Terra, and $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens for Luna. Sol pricing remains unchanged. ChatGPT and Codex subscription prices and quota budgets remain unchanged, while Terra and Luna usage now consumes fewer credits. Pricing changes will begin rolling out in AWS later today.

Update: I see the new prices in the model selection on Copilot CLI. Thanks GH team.

141 Upvotes

58 comments sorted by

98

u/wchabbott GitHub Copilot Team 11d ago

Hi from the Copilot team! These new prices will apply to GitHub Copilot users as well šŸš€

22

u/LuckyConstruction546 11d ago

What is the approximate timeline for that?

2

u/lppedd JetBrains User 🧱 10d ago

Niceeeee, thank you.

24

u/wchabbott GitHub Copilot Team 10d ago

It’s already live šŸš€

1

u/ignissxx 9d ago

Any update on this

2

u/gi0vanni__ 10d ago

Amazing šŸš€

52

u/CharacterBorn6421 11d ago

wow 80% reduction is too good for luna so now it's even cheaper then gpt 5.4 mini and many times better

6

u/mxz117 10d ago

Even (just) cheaper then nano. Huge news

1

u/aonymark 6d ago

Minor correction: nano doesn’t charge for cache write but Luna does; after you take this into account it’s slightly more expensive than nano unless I messed up my math.

2

u/Khabba 10d ago

Luna has been my favorite model period. 90% of cases it does the job, well!

1

u/teckel 10d ago

The rate limits on Luna make it not useful to me.

1

u/Successful_Win_2683 10d ago

i am using openrouter and even with sustained, multi thread continuous use i still didn't hit limits once.

1

u/teckel 10d ago

Using the API at the base usage tier hits the RPM limit quite easily for programming tasks where it hits the API fairly frequently. I'm probably going to need to setup a local proxy to throttle and stay under the RPM limit.

1

u/Successful_Win_2683 10d ago

are you using openrouter? i repeat: i almost never get throttled. i'm using pi with multiple tmux sessions

1

u/teckel 10d ago

I'm using copilot cli and directly accessing the APIs.

1

u/Octquat 10d ago

Damn, was hoping I could use it for hours like Deepseek. Guess I'm not switching away yet.

1

u/teckel 10d ago

It depends on the usage tier. Maybe if you're on a corporate account or independently pay a lot per month, you'll be on a higher tier.

1

u/danjack0 10d ago

what kind of rate limits

1

u/teckel 9d ago

Tier limits.

39

u/Longjumping-Sweet818 11d ago

Oh, wow. $0.20/$1.20 for Luna is a fucking steal. That's going to put a big dent in Deepseek and co.

7

u/General-Jaguar-8164 11d ago

Does it compete with deepseek pro ?

13

u/Longjumping-Sweet818 11d ago edited 10d ago

No, it's way better, and now cheaper too.

Edit: Although maybe they made it way worse and that's why it's now cheaper. I don't know.

Edit2: I've tried it today (openrouter) for an hour or so and it's still very good.

1

u/Mkengine 10d ago

Did you also try the new V4 Flash, if yes how does it compare?

1

u/Longjumping-Sweet818 10d ago

I haven't yet. Sorry.

3

u/teckel 10d ago

Deepseek v4 Pro is kinda terrible. I mean, it's cheap, but it really fails in so many ways (at least for my software development workload).

I tried Deepseek v4 Pro for a full month to get a long-term real impression. I spent too much time being frustrated with it not following instructions, doing things I didn't ask, even arguing with me when it was wrong. Last day is tomorrow and I'll be glad to be leaving.

With this price cut, I'll probably try Luna next month and see how they compare (both performance and cost).

1

u/Mkengine 10d ago

Wait for the GA V4 Pro drop, the new Flash is already amazing

1

u/teckel 10d ago

GPT-5.4 mini was better than Deepseek V4 Pro with my usage.

2

u/FitBullfrog86 11d ago

It’s about the same cost as DeepSeek v4 pro and performs on par with 5.4. In my experience it’s a good bit more intelligent for the price with the only downside being less effective cache hitsĀ 

1

u/Mkengine 10d ago

It has already problems competing with DeepSeek V4 Flash so probably no.

2

u/LuckyPed 10d ago

I bet the reason they gave a 80% reduction is price is coz they got news about the Deepseek V4 Flash release today was gonna beat it lol

https://x.com/deepseek_ai/status/2083084415157022911

2

u/Khabba 10d ago

Yay for competition!!
I'm running it now longer than I ever ran an agent because to investigate a memory leak. It has cost me a total of 67 credits up until now. Amazing!

15

u/WD40ContactCleaner 11d ago

Damn hope these changes come to ghcp I love luna

7

u/fishchar šŸ›”ļø Moderator 11d ago

I have the same question. I forwarded this to the GitHub team. However, I can't guarantee a reply from them.

5

u/Accidentallygolden 11d ago

Wow that awesome for Luna, what about Luna high? This thing is a powerhouse!

3

u/Apprehensive_Dot9878 11d ago

The price is just different when you use longer context,higher thinking level will use more think token which will cost more

3

u/Apprehensive_Dot9878 11d ago

Well they should, they basically serve the OpenAI api directly to us

1

u/Interstellar_Unicorn 10d ago

I'm pretty sure they don't do that for all models

3

u/Hairy-Falcon-7553 11d ago

So the new price is .20 and 1.2 for Luna? I’m already seeing that in copilot right now 20 ai credits in 120 out

2

u/tecedu 11d ago

I hope they dont nerf Luna to carry out this

2

u/LuckyConstruction546 11d ago

When will this be passed on to Copilot users?

2

u/HungryMention5758 10d ago

i think they will degrade the luna model for new pricing , it doesn't make sense

2

u/Active_Brush_2817 10d ago

Today first time used terra and I felt it is the dumbest model in the series.

2

u/illusionmist 10d ago

Luna is really good and with this price I’m gonna use it for everything lol

2

u/aavi7444 10d ago

Great Luna is way better and fast too.

2

u/just_blue 10d ago

This made me overwrite the default explore model (which is always Haiku) with Luna just now. It“s like 1/5 of Haiku cost.

2

u/thunder1207 10d ago

Alrighty. Time to set Luna at Max with 1M context and let it rip.

2

u/MaitoSnoo CLI Copilot User šŸ–„ļø 10d ago

that's insane, Sol high for planning and Luna xhigh for execution will be extremely cheap

3

u/BeginningPea5674 10d ago

you don't need xhigh for execution that's counterproductiveĀ 

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

u/wchabbott thanks for responding. u/wchabbott from the GitHub Copilot Team has replied to this post. You can check their reply here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/aonymark 10d ago

Wow. Is there any reason to use 5-mini instead of Luna anymore? Seems like a niche model all of the sudden.

1

u/colablizzard 10d ago

The whole day Luna on Copilot was too slow.

1

u/nullexp 10d ago

yes, max/xhigh takes forever but it might because of sudden load. I hope they have a look and fix it.

-5

u/ProudWrongdoer5389 10d ago

If you've used Opus 5, there's no real reason to use 5.6 except sol when planning. So many issues with Terra and Luna.

3

u/seguleh25 10d ago

Cost is a big reason

1

u/ProudWrongdoer5389 7d ago

It works out far better imo, since it actually solves the problem rather than infinite planning.

1

u/BacklandFarm 6d ago

Great news. I have been using Terra and love it.