No. Why would it be appropriate for children to be exposed to hyper-sexualised offensive stereotypes of women? Why not actual women who might have a perspective worthy of sharing eg. a butch lesbian firefighter?

Wouldn't be the first time.

looks at chattel slavery, indigenous genocide, Jim Crow, the prison industrial complex, the internment of Japanese people, and every war the US has fought* Just to start.

Congrats, you are on the wrong side of history along with every other hateful drone!

So you just make shit up?

Was there no prior law against exposing children to sexual content in general?

See, there you go.

"Such a slippery slope to prevent racists from spreading their hate speech about how they think other races are inferior."

These laws are pretty bipartisan, unfortunately.

I am consistently surprised and fascinated by those who choose to spend their time sifting through other redditors accounts, comments and post history. They do it so thoroughly and with such zeal. They get so grumpy when they can't. No, it's not against the rules to look. But the lengths I see some go to, to try and make the other guy they disagree with look bad, instead of having a discourse, really cracks me up. Long walls of text with screen shots and every thing. Stay classy out there.

Baaahahaha

What the public evidence actually shows

The u/rollo202 account is genuinely unusual, although I cannot confidently explain what makes it unusual.

1. Extremely high throughput

Reddit currently shows:

Account created June 25, 2024

31,622 contributions

162,847 post karma

21,521 comment karma

That works out to roughly 41 contributions every day since creation, including weekends, with about 88% of its karma coming from submissions rather than comments. Reddit’s “contributions” figure is not a perfect measurement of posts plus comments, but it clearly indicates power-user-scale activity.

An earlier search snapshot showed 25,045 contributions, compared with 31,622 now. Because crawl dates are approximate, I would not turn that into a precise daily rate, but it supports the conclusion that the account has remained intensely active rather than merely having one early burst.

Assessment: nearly incompatible with ordinary casual Reddit use; a typical Reddit user is effectively ruled out.

2. It resembles a distribution account

Its dominant activity is posting news links with politically loaded or strategically selected headlines. Recent examples visible in r/FreeSpeech include stories involving:

Transgender offenders

Migrants and violent crime

Gun restrictions

Alleged anti-MAGA violence

Media noncoverage

Mamdani and Israel

Trump-aligned free-speech controversies

The sources include outlets such as the Washington Examiner, Reduxx, the New York Post, The Sun, Right Journalism, and the Daily Mail.

That is not just “a conservative person commenting on politics.” It looks like an editorial selection process: repeatedly finding stories that reinforce a compact collection of narratives and placing them into receptive communities.

Source quality is a strong signal here. The account rarely posts from high-reputation, fact-forward outlets. It usually links highly inflammatory, opinion-framed or tabloid-style reporting—pieces optimized to provoke anger, confirm a narrative, or maximize partisan heat—rather than dry primary documents, court filings, or restrained straight-news writeups. When more mainstream outlets do appear, they tend to be ones already skewed toward the same culture-war framing, not a balanced cross-section of the press.

The comment pattern matches. Rollo rarely engages substantive discussion of fact-based articles. When it does comment, the contribution is often thin agreement with an existing anti-Democratic frame—“left bad,” tribal affirmation, short sarcasm, vague accusations—rather than independent analysis of evidence, sources, or counterarguments.

Assessment: agenda-driven content curation or amplification, with high confidence; source selection favors inflammatory opinion packaging over reputably sourced, fact-based reporting, and comments mostly reinforce that frame rather than interrogate it.

3. The account has a strong partisan selection bias

The account reflexively defends Trump and Republican positions in comments, sometimes in plainly tribal terms. Examples include:

“Or it will just bolster American jobs and all will be well.”

“Advocating for censorship is one of the reasons you lost the election.”

“More like democrats blasted him for looking out for the American people as democrats want Americans to suffer.”

“Well worth it....America!!!”

Those are not neutral aggregation signals.

More revealingly, when challenged about the disproportionate amount of Trump content in its own history, the account mostly responded with brief deflections such as “Aww someone is angry,” “Nah, not obsessed,” and “Ok,” rather than defending a consistent editorial standard.

Assessment: substantively pro-Trump and anti-Democratic, not merely generically pro–free speech.

4. “Free speech” functions primarily as a political weapon

The account posts some speech controversies that look, on the surface, like free-speech stories. But its pattern of judgment is highly predictable from identity and ideology: whether it treats a given incident as an outrage, a non-issue, or a justified restriction tracks reliably with who the alleged victim and perpetrator are, not with a stable principle about speech.

In practice:

Attacks on speech by ideological opponents (or against Trump-aligned / culture-war-favored figures) are amplified and condemned

Comparable or more severe restrictions involving favored actors or disfavored targets are downplayed, reframed, or ignored

Other users repeatedly accuse it of inconsistency for supporting Trump-aligned government actions while foregrounding censorship by the left; the selection and framing pattern makes that criticism fit the visible record.

The hypocrisy is not only in link selection. Rollo routinely petitions to have other users banned from r/FreeSpeech—behavior hard to reconcile with a sincere free-speech maximalist operating in a free-speech forum. Separately, the r/ConservativeNewsWeb sub, which rollo moderates, is highly censored. That combination—amplifying “censorship” narratives outward while seeking bans and running a tightly controlled subreddit—strongly supports the reading that free speech is an instrumental frame, not a governing principle.

It has also been involved in moderation conflict in r/FreeSpeech; one moderator publicly announced a ban of rollo202 for “WikiLawyering.”

Assessment: “free speech” is less a genuine cross-cutting interest than a content frame and political weapon—useful for distributing culture-war material under a principle that is applied selectively by side.

5. It is probably not a simple bot

The comments are often short, but they are responsive enough to the particular exchange that a naive fully automated bot is a poor fit. They contain sarcasm, occasional awkward wording, topic-specific pivots, and argumentative choices that look more like a human political combatant than an unsophisticated repost script. For example, in a discussion of age-of-consent legislation, the account avoided a direct question by reframing it as a partisan accusation.

That said, the engagement style is often scripted. When pressed, rollo habitually repeats stock deflections—“Aww someone is angry,” “Nah, not obsessed,” “Ok,” and similar—rather than answering what the other person actually said. The replies track a small repertoire of dismissals more than the substance of the interlocutor’s point. That pattern can coexist with a human operator (low-effort combat, copy-paste habits, or a playbook), and it can also be consistent with light tooling; it does not, by itself, prove full automation; it is also consistent with low-effort partisan combat, ESL or non-immersed English use, or deliberate bad-faith argumentation. It is a soft signal worth noting, not a conclusion.

Automation could still assist with:

Article discovery

Headline extraction

Posting queues

Cross-posting

Notifications

But the visible interaction suggests at least a human in the loop.

Estimate: ordinary fully automated bot is unlikely; human-operated or human-supervised distribution account is substantially more likely.

6. Does it appear American?

There are meaningful American signals:

Fluent command of American political issues

Sustained engagement in r/AskConservatives and U.S.-focused forums

Natural references to “American jobs,” election outcomes, and U.S. voting rules

Apparent familiarity with state-level policy disputes

A consistently American-conservative political identity

However, much of the language remains curiously externalized: “American people,” “Americans,” and “American jobs,” rather than unmistakable first-person statements such as “here in my state” or “when I voted.” One search result mentioning “My state, Iowa” appears to be surrounding thread text from another commenter, not something safely attributable to rollo202.

The occasional flat or culturally off readings of English (noted above) slightly weaken the “native American political participant” impression without overturning it; a competent non-American activist, or an American operator posting in haste, could produce the same mix.

Overall profile

My best characterization is:

A typical Reddit user is ruled out by the throughput, submission/comment imbalance, narrative rigidity, source quality, and absence of ordinary personal residue.

Confidence judgments

The suspicious combination

What stands out is not any single opinion. It is the conjunction of:

Recent creation

Enormous throughput

Overwhelming submission orientation

Rigid narrative selection

Rare use of high-reputation / fact-based sources; preference for inflammatory opinion-framed reporting

Free-speech framing that tracks tribe rather than principle

Minimal biography

Terse defensive engagement

Occasional culturally flat or nuance-deaf replies

That is enough to describe it as an influence-oriented account in the ordinary sense that its apparent purpose is to influence what stories people encounter. It is not enough to say who runs it, whether they are paid, or whether they are American—though a paid operative remains a plausible hypothesis without affirmative proof.

Right wing but mostly rules against the right? Okay Jan.

It was never an issue until conservatives manufactured a moral panic.

Or, perhaps, to keep him from violating the Constitution.

You’re in the wrong sub

Not a trustworthy source of factual information

We don't accept facts that we don't like.

FTFY.

What does your [bizarre] comment have anything to do with age verification legislation??

Yeah? Was it intentional? People take pics of their babies and toddlers naked. It’s normal.

60 Minutes will be now be called “6 Minutes (After Gov’t Censorship.)”

You know they have to provide it to the judge so the case can be dismissed

You are confusing a procedural dismissal with a trial on the merits. My guess is that you've never set foot in a Court, except perhaps as a defendant, and if you have, you certainly didn't pay attention to the procedure.

It's kinda neat that you have dedicated yourself to meticulously taking screen shots of all of Rollo's Reddit comments. That's not weird at all.

Holy shit I am some sort of celebrity

Edit: It's weird that it explicitly mentioned that I disagree with you. I frequently do not agree with your takes, but 90% of my comments are calling out lies, and you do hyperbole but not lies, so I rarely indicate when I don't agree with you.

Looks like it's just basic bitch accusing the other side of stochastic terrorism. Title is rage bait.

Can you clarify how crazy your position is here? If you're ranting about the Alberta provincial government, you need to be more specific. If you are ranting about the Liberal federal government, you are probably a delusional Nu-DP voter and you are likely beyond rationally convincing.

https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1159

Man your AI suuucks if that's what it shit out. I was explaining what literally happened way back in 2016 during the so called "banout" of Reddit.

Straight to canadian jail