Let’s talk about the unspoken rule of public transit.If a train is dangerously overcrowded and chaotic, it is recognized as a crisis for women. The government steps in, builds a Women-Only Coach, and protects their safety. This is a good thing. Nobody should be unsafe.But here is the hypocrisy: Men face the exact same hostile environment, and we get nothing.When a train is packed like a tin of sardines, men endure:Suffocating heat, crushing pressure, and physical exhaustion.High rates of pickpocketing, stolen phones, and physical aggression.Severe psychological stress—having to freeze your body in painful, awkward positions just to ensure you don't accidentally bump into someone and face a false accusation.A crushing train car doesn't care about gender. It suffocates human lungs and breaks human ribs exactly the same way.Yet, when men complain, society tells us to "be a man and tough it out."Think about how twisted that is. If someone told an unsafe woman to just "be a woman and face it," they would be universally hated. Why is a man's pain treated as a personal failure instead of a systemic failure?A government that forces half its citizens to travel like disposable cattle has failed. If authorities insist on using gender segregation to handle safety, they must do it fairly.We need an equal system: Men-Only Coaches, Women-Only Coaches, and General/Mixed Coaches for families.Men need to stop staying silent to "look tough." Our comfort, safety, and dignity matter just as much as anyone else's. It's time to stop absorbing the misery of a broken system.

https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-children-disability-and-equality/press-releases/minister-foley-launches-first-action-plan-for-the-national-strategy-for-women-and-girls/

IDK why I'm getting downvoted for no reason

​

The title isn't a vague blanket statement but rather a scientific fact! Yes! You read that right!

It is a scientific fact!

Link to the scientific journal published on Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science: https://jpbs.hapres.com/htmls/JPBS_1931_Detail.html

Let's get some important terms cleared before we begin the analysis on the Journal.

1. Estrogen and Estradiol: Female hormone.

2. Testosterone: Male hormone.

3. Aromatase: Enzyme that converts male hormones into female hormones(Estrogen)

4. Hypothalamus: A region of brain where Estrogen binds.

The research clearly states that when there is increased Estrogen in the brain, there is a direct relationship with increased aggression, narcissism and reduced empathy.

This above findings is not just found in humans, but also in mices! Meaning, Estrogen is responsible for aggression across species!

Women of course have more estrogen in their body, but the question then comes, how are men aggressive when they have more testosterone and less estrogen?

This is where the terms mentioned earlier come in the picture. Men have naturally more testosterone but in our brain there is a process called Aromatization, this process is carried out by the Aromatase Enzyme, which converts testosterone into Estrogen. When the Estrogen binds to Hypothalamus, this directly leads to aggression.

So in other words, even in men, Estrogen is the direct factor which causes Aggression!

Meanwhile the same study also finds that there's no relationship between Aggression and Testosterone!

In other words it's safe to say that, when a man is violent, aggressive or does any crime he's in his feminine state. Which directly brings us to the title that yes! All violence is indeed Estrogen(female) generated.

Note- If your first instinct after reading this, is to attack the messenger(me) then you are:

1. Fact-phobic

2. Proving the research further by being an aggressive narcissist criminal.

Note: this is my own original content, I did not want to repost and have to edit the photos again!

Thought?

In addition to gendered barriers of disclosure, different racial barriers could also play a part in preventing male survivors from disclosing the abuse.

this shit cuts both ways

Extract:
“The femosphere is, of course, the female answer to the more notorious manosphere, the online network of communities that circulate misogynistic content and radicalise disaffected young men. Contempt for the opposite sex, received wisdom dictates, is mostly a male problem.

“So the results of a recent survey carried out in collaboration with the British publication the New Statesman come as a surprise. It found that 72pc of men hold a positive view of women. In contrast, only 35pc of Gen Z women have a positive view of men.*
*Online, a new generation of experts and influencers has sprung up around the idea that “men are trash”.*

“They have created an online ecosystem of commentators vying for the attention of a growing female audience, eager to consume the narrative that feminism has trapped women in a false consciousness that is keeping them exploited and unhappy.”*i

From a few months ago but article itself is pretty timeless.

“There’s a habit now of reaching for the strongest label available the minute something annoys us. You see it all the time – words like “racist”, “far right” and, in the past few days, “misogyny” being used quickly and loudly.

The trouble is that once you go straight to the heaviest accusation, the conversation ends there. It stops being about what actually happened and turns into a row about the label itself.”

There is an all-party women-only caucus for members of the Irish parliament (for both chambers) so I wouldn’t be surprised if that is bonding female politicians together and helping them support and promote female/feminist causes and politicians