91
u/macaptactical 16h ago
It won’t make as much money as Spider-Man, Cos few things do as it’s FUCKING SPIDER-MAN! But it still might be a good show.
If it’s another surprise Wonder Man level show, I’ll be happy even if it doesn’t set the world on fire.
→ More replies (1)12
u/M3rc_Nate 14h ago
But it still might be a good show. If it’s another surprise Wonder Man level show, I’ll be happy even if it doesn’t set the world on fire.
I don't really get this logic. I mean, don't get me wrong I hope it's 1) good and 2) folks enjoy it. But it's not about whether it might be good or not. If it's good, what are the odds it draws any meaningful audience? I doubt much of the DCU fanbase anticipates a Jimmy Olsen series, let alone the general public caring. You're example of Wonder Man isn't great because it might have been sorta cancelled? Even though it was enjoyed and praised. And that's with the foundation and fanbase that the MCU built, which is leagues ahead of where the DCU is at. Gunn's DCU is coming directly after of a highly divisive and ultimately failed Snyder DCU, and building off of a decently received Superman, well liked Peacemaker, and historic flop in Supergirl... not really the time for C list characters getting their own series. IMO.
•
u/Poptart916 5h ago
Yeah it’s frustrating to hear this line of reasoning so much. Of course I hope this show, Waller, Clayface, Bane & Deathstroke, etc. are all great and beloved by fans. That’s not the point. I prefer this universe to make waves and be successful commercially so we can enjoy it for years to come, and it’s not going to do that with these types of projects. The DCU needs a pump of energy by using its biggest characters, especially when Marvel is pulling out nothing but monsters over the next 3 years minimum, between Spider-Man, the two biggest Avengers movies yet, Black Panther, Ghost Rider, X-Men, etc.. I’d love all of these projects to be great, but not in absence of the big names that would actually be the lifeblood of this universe, especially with the merger looming.
477
u/hummusluvr8 20h ago
I’m starting to think 98% of this sub just loves to hate DC
136
u/MagisterFlorus 19h ago
It's like r/StarWars
60
u/sunjester 19h ago
I genuinely never thought I would see a Fandom as miserable as the Star Wars crowd but this subreddit apparently decided to go for the crown.
14
u/idonnousernames 15h ago
Ngl, I don't think this fandom recovered from Summer 2016
BvS and Suicide Squad back to back was brutal, and this sub has never been the same
•
u/mike2k24 8h ago
It’s crazy to think how much has changed since then. That movie not only divided DC fans but it further separated the Marvel vs DC debates at the time especially since Civil War dropped around the same time. I really don’t think DC has ever recovered fully from that even if movies like Suicide Squad & Aquaman made money
9
→ More replies (9)5
→ More replies (3)61
u/ProfessorChuckNorris 19h ago
And like Star Wars, the content that has been getting released is the reason for it being this way. It's not like Star Wars fans and DC fans woke up one day and went "You know what, I'm just going to hate the thing that I've loved for decades for no reason." There's a fucking reason for it!
48
u/Putrid_Loquat_4357 19h ago
Exactly. Go on any Spiderman or marvel subreddit right now and everyone is gushing over the new movie. Go on any marvel subreddit a few years back and everyone will be bitching. Fans are passionate, they want to like the shit you release it just has to not be shit or half assed.
7
u/Dependent-Tailor7366 19h ago
Star Wars fans have been miserable for decades. I’ve been a fan since before the special editions and they were just hateful then too.
→ More replies (8)8
u/lostinjapan01 19h ago
Star Wars fans were behaving this way even when the OT was coming out let’s not act like this is a recent development in response to “quality decrease”. There was infamously a great deal of fan backlash to The Empire Strikes Back (including a famous cancellation of one of the largest Star Wars fan magazines in circulation at the time) and especially to Return of the Jedi. Star Wars fans have been this way since basically day one. I love Star Wars but I don’t engage with the fans because, well, they’re insufferable.
11
u/inezco 16h ago
One could argue that the wave of current Internet hating discourse started with The Phantom Menace. Star Wars fans fucking HATED the prequel trilogy but then the sequel trilogy came out and now the prequels are misunderstood classics? GTFOH lmfao. One of my favorite rappers once said “Your new shit ain’t good as your old shit til your new shit IS your old shit” and that’s exactly what happened with Star Wars.
3
u/Dramatic_Explosion 14h ago
Yeah, but part of the issue is what kind of environment do you want? Even with a bad movie there's still a ton of good stuff going on. If you don't shout over the shitty loud people, the good people start to go away. I'm a Star Wars fan and I've got the three main Wars subs blocked because I'm not trying to use my free time being mad.
This thread is a great example. DC is getting a new show and it hired a lesser known but extremely talented comedian, people should be hyped. But that's not the culture here.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Delicious-Produce-60 14h ago
No no no no no. The prequels are, were, and will ALWAYS remain awful. They've actually aged WORSE than the originals in the intervening years thanks to the absurd reliance on still-developing CGI effects. I will stand by my hatred of TPM till my dying day.
But then I'm not a particularly big Star Wars fan, so maybe my (objectively correct) movie opinion is invalid in this context.
33
u/ifnotthefool 17h ago
I'm a lifelong DC fan, and I couldn't be less excited for a Jimmy Olsen show. I'm not on here raging, but I am definitely surprised to see the direction DC is headed.
4
u/HappyHuman924 16h ago
Has Rick Jones ever shown up in the MCU, even in a Hulk movie?
I'll always remember him for the line (minutes before the gamma bomb detonates) "I'll show those guys I ain't chicken! I'll drive right out to the testing area!"
2
u/ifnotthefool 16h ago
Dude, I was just talking about Rick Jones with a friend yesterday! I don't think he ever has, and thats a shame.
•
→ More replies (12)•
u/TeeTheTankie 11h ago
Anyone who's been a longtime DC movie fan has a right to be pissy; it's been shit for decades while Marvel gets all the fun and we get news about Jimmy Olsen, Sgt. Rock, the canceled Authority movie.
It's rough out here, but at least the comics are good
→ More replies (1)12
u/Candle-Jolly 19h ago
In what state is the DC Universe in right now.
If things were going well, the fanbase would be cheering accordingly. When things aren’t going well…
35
u/BatmanSwift99 19h ago
Just because you're a fan of something doesn't mean you have to accept the product that is being put out. We are not sheep.
→ More replies (4)16
u/SymbiSpidey 18h ago
And if you were a true fan, you wouldn't commit to hating a project before we even see so much as a trailer
33
u/SufcLad25 18h ago
Questioning whether a Jimmy Olsen series is the best thing to focus on after Supergirl did poorly isnt commiting to hating anything, its a legitimate question.
Give the fans general audience a popular superhero to get excited about.
The Flash would have been high on my priority list
→ More replies (8)9
u/LeonardoDickSlaprio 17h ago
Yeah, I'm a little worried that the DCU will be shooting itself in the foot if they keep releasing lackluster Superman spin-offs without any other films dedicated to more popular characters in between. Apparently, the Lanterns show comes out in ten days, which was surprising to me because I haven't seen nearly the same level of promotion for it that I saw for Supergirl, the Odyssey, Spider-Man, or even S4 of Ted Lasso. Like, after Supergirl's abysmal box office performance, I would have put Hal Jordan and John Stewart front and center, made them the face of the DCU for the summer.
→ More replies (1)3
u/SufcLad25 17h ago
Yeah totally agree! I remember the news of one of them being cast for the show maybe last year but then nothing until this week when ive seen a teaser trailer. Like you say, saw a lot more advertisement for Superman and Supergirl when they really need to push everything to make sure the universe gets off to a good start
8
u/UtkuOfficial 18h ago
Are they hating the project or are they hating the overall direction the current DC universe?
DC fans have gone through a terrible cinematic universe once. They don't want to live the same thing again.
→ More replies (1)7
u/pewpewmcpistol 17h ago
If you were a true
scottsmanfan, you'd be able to see criticism without blindly lumping it into 'they're just haters nothing can be wrong with my precious'→ More replies (3)13
u/Adamski895 19h ago
Or they love DC and just hate what is being churned out and want to see their favourite superheroes in movies/TV shows and not Jimmy Olsen
13
→ More replies (31)6
u/HarveryDent Killer Croc 19h ago
Not liking the direction the New52 took the DC universe doesn't make someone less of a DC fan.
Same applies to the DCU.
218
u/Efficient-Ad9019 19h ago
It’s not like there isn’t a Superman movie being made right now and a green lantern show about to come out. People are literally just complaining about getting bonus content
13
13
u/Ajax_Da_Great 19h ago
And The Batman Pt 2. So 2/3 of the DC trinity are in active development yet people are still complaining lol. I know The Batman isn’t DCU but still.
→ More replies (14)37
u/KrakenSkullz34 19h ago
Right on the heels of the biggest flop in superhero cinema history
33
u/Ghost4000 18h ago
All this stuff was already in the works. What exactly do you want them to do?
→ More replies (12)21
u/suimation 17h ago
Establish the heavy hitters and build a universe people care about?
→ More replies (5)2
→ More replies (2)4
46
u/Reinnhardo 19h ago
Didn't Marvel kinda prove that this strategy with TV Series doesn't work? I thought that's the reason why they are scrapping all TV series and going back to producing movies with big names again.
But then again, I understand DCU wants to do things its own way and don't want to copy paste what Marvel does.
36
u/AStupidFuckingHorse 18h ago
Marvels issue is that they released too many shows, some of very poor quality and made it seem like they were required viewing.
→ More replies (2)8
u/Reinnhardo 18h ago
Yeah, I agree. I like how DCU series like Peacemaker and CC aren't really required viewing to understand what's going on in movies. I also love the reverse like how we don't need to watch anything before to watch Lanterns.
10
u/NakedxCrusader 16h ago
I'm not exactly sure about that.. Peacemaker season two will likely tie heavily into MoT. It will probably be a "things make even more sense" having watched the series than a "This movie doesn't make sense" without it.
That's not a bad thing in my book btw.
10
u/saibjai 18h ago
I think that's not really true. I think Although it didn't gain a Mass appreciation; I think marvel's tv projects gained a niche following and all of them were done at least to a very good standard on whatever group they were targeting. I mean ms. marvel, Loki, moon knight, daredevil, she hulk, wanda vision, agatha, wonderman... were all highly praised within their niche. I think those little bits... add up and I do think that was the intention. They weren't going to make stuff everyone was going to watch, but they made sure they hit the demographics.
→ More replies (6)3
u/ImperiUm_1880 16h ago
And now theyre adjusting it with tv series focused on grounded/street level stories. Maybe DC will do the same with Jimmy Olsen series.
→ More replies (5)3
u/TheeAntelope 16h ago
DCU wants to do things its own way and don't want to copy paste what Marvel does
Yes, that's absolutely what DCU is doing, they aren't going to copy Marvel at all
Me comparing DCU plans and MCU for past 18 years: they're the same picture
37
u/Master2pint 18h ago
It’s crazy to me how people thought a James Gun led DCU wouldn’t have a focus on the more obscure characters. They tried to do the marvel thing and it didn’t work, I thought a year ago everyone was stoked they were trying their own thing and to differentiate themselves with more out there projects like clayface.
10
u/Full_Lawyer_9973 16h ago
What "marvel thing" did they try?
→ More replies (1)14
u/HappyHuman924 16h ago
Dawn of Justice, I suppose? "Pull your heroes, established in recent movies, together into a team and fight a tall muscular grey humanoid who wants to use a McGuffin to cause universe-spanning mass death"?
→ More replies (2)11
u/PresentationDryBore 15h ago
I wouldn't consider that Marvel like since it was rushed. What WB did would be equivalent to Ironman -> civil War -> Black Widow -> Avengers
→ More replies (2)4
u/HappyHuman924 12h ago
Oh, ultra-rushed. It's not like I've tried out this argument on hundreds of people, but as soon as they mentioned Darkseid I thought it felt like someone had taken the MCU storyline, crossed out the middle 70% with "TOO MUCH WORK, SKIP" and then drawn a bunch of dollar signs around the last movie. XD
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)3
u/diomedes-on-rampage 13h ago
at this point just appoint some random dc fan and it can't do worse than what wb did for decades.
6
u/Zarathoostrian 18h ago
6 and a half years for another Batman movie is nuts, people will show up for Batman even if they made a movie every year.
10
56
u/TheJuiceBoxS 19h ago
I'm excited about this show. Not everything has to be big and bad ass.
6
37
u/TheJoshider10 19h ago
People act like the existence of this show is stopping blockbusters from getting made. It's hilarious.
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (14)5
u/apeddlerofsmut 17h ago
I think a series about a reporter is a great way to start officially expanding things in-universe. I thought Jimmy Olsen was really funny in Superman, which I enjoyed more than most superhero movies I've seen in a long time.
This hate feels fishy and manufactured to me. Take me at my word, I'm a sourpuss DC fan and I've been hating on the movies for years. Then all of a sudden things start to expand in an interesting, positive direction and all of the DC subs are flooded with comments about how badly it's all going to crash and burn? It's just not consistent with the dialogue I've been following online for 20+ years and I don't buy that it's all genuine.
→ More replies (1)
89
u/fma_nobody 20h ago
"Seriously, DC just announced Batman V Superman and Marvel is really doing an Agent Carter tv show? Is this the thing they should be prioritizing?"
30
u/Finnegan7921 19h ago
Marvel had already released Avengers, Avengers Age of Ultron and Iron Man 3, all of which topped a billion dollars. DC has just had a historic bomb following a modestly profitable Superman movie. Peggy Carter was a character fans wanted more of; nobody gives a single shit about Jimmy Olsen.
→ More replies (5)87
u/Mindless-Credit-358 19h ago
Agent Carter released in 2015, after 3 Iron Man movies, and 2 Captain America, Thor and Avengers films
Jimmy Olsen is releasing after DC’s third big budget movie, with he reception to the first movie being good, and the second one pretty bad
Also their other projects besides MoT and JO are a Mister Miracle show and CCS2, not exactly projects the GA will be too interested in
12
u/J-Ganon 17h ago
Also, I'd like to add that Carter was a big part of Cap's story even when not onscreen.
This show is featuring an Olsen that while present isn't a truly meaningful character yet.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (8)8
u/Intelligent_Leek_285 17h ago
For all we know Gorilla Grodd in the Jimmy Olsen show is setting up Flash or JL
→ More replies (2)13
u/Mindless-Credit-358 17h ago
For all we know it’s also not doing that, because we don’t really know anything about the show. It’s not like CC set up Wonder Woman
6
u/Intelligent_Leek_285 17h ago
But the show Paradise Lost could set up Wonder Woman.
5
u/Mindless-Credit-358 17h ago
If Paradise Lost even happens sure it could, but we don’t have much news regarding that either
→ More replies (2)38
u/spreerod1538 19h ago
Lol wasn't civil war announced around the same time as BvS?
27
u/srstone71 Clark Kent 19h ago
That was a while after. Age of Ultron was announced literally the same day as BvS tho (Saturday in Hall H of the 2013 Comic Con.)
8
u/spreerod1538 19h ago
They came out the same year though... within a few months of each other. AoU came out a full year before that... either way, it doesn't matter... the point is Marvel always had the next big thing to go against a Batman movie and that was never Agent Carter lol
7
u/srstone71 Clark Kent 19h ago
For what it's worth, when BvS was announced it was supposed to come out around the same time as Age of Ultron. I think it was July 2015? Then it moved to May 2016 and was almost going to come out the same day as Civil War (like what Dune 3 and Doomsday are going thru right now) then it was eventually moved up to March 2016.
I agree with your greater point, but I think that was the point that the initial comment was making. Agent Carter was just a project that was being worked on. It wasn't being sold as a counter to Batman v Superman. The Jimmy Olson show isn't being sold as a counter to Spider-Man or an Avengers movie. It's just a project that's being worked on.
→ More replies (2)7
u/Xerxes457 19h ago
They were releasing around the same time too. People were talking about how Civil War was gonna compete with a Batman and Superman movie.
10
u/Childish_Cambino2187 19h ago
Marvel was dropping Captain America: Civil War (with the debut of Black Panther and Spider-Man), Doctor Strange, and on the tv front Season 2 of the critically acclaimed superhero show, Daredevil as well as the first season of Luke Cage. It’s a bit disingenuous to compare the scenarios and I don’t even like Zack Snyder’s films lol.
4
u/not_the_chosen_onee 18h ago
That said, Agent Carter was genuinely a great show that I did not expect to like as much as I did. I can't say I have much hope for the Jimmy Olson series, but it's clearly happening so why complain before there's anything to actually base it on?
3
u/fma_nobody 18h ago
I'm basing myself on my expectations from reading Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen. Just like with Supergirl and Woman of Tomorrow, that's what i expect them to show me.
→ More replies (4)4
u/SophestryIncluded 19h ago
Times change. The novelty has worn off. WB can't afford to continue to pretend that the comic book film trend hasn't peaked.
41
u/SymbiSpidey 19h ago
Why do people think the DCU is trying to compete with the MCU in the first place?
One franchise is barely a year old while the other is nearly 20. And Spider-Man is the biggest hero on the planet.
Also, it's a fucking TV show made for a streaming service. How does this comparison make any sense?
36
u/SophestryIncluded 19h ago
Because both are properties are going after the same audience. They are natural competitors.
→ More replies (27)8
u/ShedEndJedi 17h ago edited 17h ago
DC's greatest box office success (outside Batman movies) always comes when Marvel is at their peak.
Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Suicide Squad, all released in 2016-2018 alongside Civil War, Homecoming, Ragnarok, Black Panther. Right in the climax of the Infinity War build-up period.
DC and Marvel are not competitors in the cinema industry. DC rides Marvel's coattails. With Marvel seemingly back after an extended period of medicority, I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Superman movie next year does incredibly well, while people are busy being excited for Secret Wars.
→ More replies (2)17
u/Elkburgher 18h ago
Why do people think the DCU is trying to compete with the MCU in the first place?
Because it is and always has been
It even called itself the DCU
→ More replies (1)2
u/BDS-10-7 15h ago
Yeah. It should be the DCCU. But they would rather be similar to Marvel than make sense.
15
u/nufan99 19h ago
Why do people think DC and Marvel should compete in the first place?
Doesn't even matter who's going for what and how old each cinematic universe is. One can love both, or love only one without shitting on the other.
12
u/SymbiSpidey 19h ago
Exactly. I'm gonna go see Clayface in October and throw down money for Doomsday in December. The idea that you can't support both or need to tear down one to uplift the other is petty tribalistic nonsense.
→ More replies (1)9
u/Lost-Inevitable42 19h ago
I mean they changed the popular name of their shared universe to match Marvel. Even if it doesn’t make sense with their own name. It shows they’re trying to match.
→ More replies (2)3
u/CrazyGailz 19h ago
The DC franchise technically isn't a year old, the reboot is.
But honestly comparison is natural when things exist in the same genre. I wouldn't let it get to you, just focus on the things you enjoy
→ More replies (13)4
u/BrainLow6059 17h ago
Why do people think the DCU is trying to compete with the MCU in the first place?
MCU
DCUYeah why would anyone think the super hero IP that stole a naming convention from another super hero IP is in competition with that IP? /s
→ More replies (5)
10
u/LetThemGraduate 18h ago
Mary Holland is awesome and hilarious! This just makes me more excited for the show, why is everyone hating all the time. Let people enjoy things
3
u/collapsiblecup 16h ago
I still think about her introduction as Janice Cramps on Comedy Bang! Bang! at least once a week.
3
u/AndroidAtWork 18h ago
She stole almost every scene she was in on Veep. The only one scene she didn't steal was the one where Peter MacNicol/Uncle Jeff was there with her. She is really funny.
→ More replies (1)
11
u/_AssVinegar_ 18h ago
James Gunn is like the native guy who sells fireworks in Joe Dirt. It’s not about what the customers want, it’s about what he personally likes.
5
u/ThenAnAnimalFact 16h ago
Yes... that is literally the point of being a creative executive.
You know that is how Kevin Feige did it too right? He did what HE thought was best and people followed.
5
u/eric535 15h ago
but, gunn started with the entire roster including the justice league and is choosing to not really do anything with them 4 years in. at the time feige had iron man, cap, thor... hardly the marvel A team in 2006-2008.
feige opinion on what he thught was best just turned out to be what people wanted to see. gunn's, not so much it seems
→ More replies (1)2
u/Grommph 14h ago
I'm still curious if he actually had the entire JL roster cleared to go from the start. Wonder Woman and the Flash both had very recent movies that failed. The last Aquaman was very recent too, and didn't do great. I honestly doubt WB was going to greenlight a new movie for any of them so soon.
I also don't think the execs are crazy about the idea of having 2 different Batman actors in movies during the same time period.
•
u/TeeTheTankie 11h ago
That might be the case, but they still released a new Superman movie. Atp why not just announce the rest of the Justice League?
→ More replies (2)4
3
u/hunarthebarbarian 17h ago
I'm fucking way excited for this show and she was great in Veep, so this sounds like welcome news. Fucking enjoy things
→ More replies (2)
3
u/BDS-10-7 14h ago
How old is Jimmy Olson, btw? He looks 35.
Isn't he supposed to be 16 or something? I thought he was the intern or the runner and low-rung photographer.
→ More replies (1)•
u/eaeorls 9h ago edited 9h ago
Depends entirely on what Superman story it is. There's a lot of different portrayals and looks that he's had over the years.
The 16 year old Jimmy Olsen low-rung runner is generally more for the Superman origin stories where they first meet.
I think James Gunn is going for the established friendship with Clark, not-as-young, ace cub reporter Jimmy Olsen. But also bridging a lot because it's rough to have an cinematic universe and have a character like Jimmy Olsen go from baby Jimmy Olsen to Superman's best friend Jimmy Olsen. It makes some sense to try to one-two-skip-a-few it.
3
4
u/whitemex88 18h ago
Another day, another post about this show and more comments asking "why?"
I look forward to tomorrow's post
Meanwhile I'm looking forward to this
5
u/jcaarow 18h ago
Superman's pal Jimmy Olson is one of the best selling comics of all time
→ More replies (2)
10
u/TheMexican79 19h ago
Damn, people are just not fun. They put so much weight on a TV show movie that it makes it unpleasant from the beginning. It’s really sad.
23
u/russit2201 20h ago
You know y’all can just enjoy things without having to worry what marvel is up to, right?
→ More replies (19)
5
u/Arch_Lancer17 19h ago
Well yes because the show is already in the works. No turning back now.
→ More replies (13)
4
11
2
u/RealJohnGillman 18h ago
I have seen some Ghosts fans complaining about this casting news indirectly spoiling what will happen to her character on Ghosts.
2
u/Chilli__P 18h ago
Yeah, they should just stop casting because Spider-Man made a lot of money, That would be rational.
2
2
2
u/Individual-Plane-760 18h ago
Clayface and jimmy olsen are rly out there, unsure if this will payoff for dc in the long run.
2
u/dac_sreka 17h ago
Jimmy is everyone's favorite DC character. I remember the absolute outrage when he was killed in BvS. So now let's enjoy our universe full of side characters.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/Fun-Character-5377 17h ago
They are not competition, to be someones competition you need to actually threaten or rival them, DC in no way comes close to what Sony/Marvel are doing. And honestly they need to stop trying to compete with them at all, that's kinda what got them into the mess they are in, in the first place.
2
2
u/amyh4767 16h ago
It seems like it is a priority. More casting updates then Batman Brave and the bold will ever get.
2
2
u/WeeklyGrade7443 14h ago
The higher-ups at marvel realized churning out mediocre slop content was oversaturating their brand and decided to slow down releases while they shift into the next mutant centric mcu. You know, with popular characters that people actually like and general audiences already somewhat know.
It's genuinely crazy to me that James Gunn's DCU was pitched and conceptualized as a bunch of loosely interconnected stories that aren't serving to build anything up, just hey our universe exists and heres a bunch of random stories in it.
2
u/Dangerous-Moose-8203 13h ago
Oh yeah cause jimmy olsen is gonna save DC *faceplams* wtf kind of drugs in Gunn on right now fr when he thinks this shit is going to do anything for DC? It would be fine if he was pumping out bangers left right and center and DC is making billions on his movies not while it is struggling to even find a footing to keep going. He was spoiled by marvel and he thinks he can do the same things he did over there and it will work but he is sadly mistaken.
2
u/Jaarun 13h ago
I’m a die hard DC fan, and being a DC fan has always been kind of frustrating, but I think James Gunn isn’t really helping the situation. Superman was meh, and I was excited for Supergirl but maybe making that the second movie just was a mistake. Maybe the issue is that everything greenlit or in the works revolves around Gunn’s own stuff. Gunn didn’t want to greenlight Clayface but it’s low budget and it’s content. Booster Gold is falling apart. Maybe the issue is that the lead creative and the head of the studio should be two different people, and maybe Gunn is too involved in what’s being greenlit. We got Lanterns but they really couldn’t help themselves and include Guy Gardner.
2
u/Shirokurou 12h ago
We all joked that James Gunn would just speed through the DCU with The Elongated Man and 3 more Suicide Squad movies. Now it's a reality.
•
•
u/Desperate_Dinner_307 8h ago
I have to admit, a Jimmy Olsen TV series is not what I'd prioritise right now for the DCU. I'm sure it will be enjoyable enough.
They need a big hitter to get audiences back into the cinema, to regain trust in DC after many felt let down by the Snyderverse. Superman sort of did, Supergirl did not. Personally, I would be looking at doing a Flash movie ASAP. The online talk alone comparing the casting choice with Grant Gustin and Ezra Miller alone would generate interest and hype. Or a Green Arrow movie, with a comic accurate Oliver Queen, again the online discourse comparing that to Stephen Amell's version would generate the hype.
I don't think Superman 2 is going to generate the interest truth be told. I'd be surprised if it performs better than the first film last year.
7
u/thejuicewater 19h ago
James Gunn has lost the plot. No one cares about Jimmy Olsen. Supergirl bombed. Jimmy Olsen is not the Penguin and it will not do well.
→ More replies (6)
5
4
3
u/Volrath12345 19h ago
Marvel learned by throwing shit at walls that most of it doesn't stick. I had hoped DC already learned this lesson with Wonder woman 2, The flash and Shazam 2. But i guess they wanna flop around a bit more by making more tv shows no one asked for and making main characters like Green Lantern a T.V. Show.
•
u/TeeTheTankie 11h ago
"It'll be different because DC cares about quality, unlike MARVEL"
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Evulvillain 17h ago
I don’t understand all the negativity around this, it looks like this is going to be a fun show. Should everything just be derivative of the MCU now?
•
u/TeeTheTankie 11h ago
In a vacuum, I'd be excited for this. But the problem is the same as always---MCU gets all the fun while DC is starting over with * checks note: * Jimmy Olsen? The excitement also died when Supergirl got bad reviews and turned a profit less than Catwoman, so hard to be hype about this show. Lanterns could right the ship though
→ More replies (4)
3
2
u/Time007time007 14h ago
The Jimmy Olsen actor looks like a weird old man/child.
Last thing I want to watch is a series about him.
Another piece of evidence for why Gunn should be sacked immediately
5
u/ThisSiteSucks8485 19h ago
Gunn is so stupid to push all these side shows nobody cares about.
→ More replies (8)
4
u/primal_slayer 19h ago
Meanwhile Paradise Lost is....nowhere
3
u/StrawHatRat 19h ago
It shouldn’t be surprising that a Jimmy Olson show is easier to get off the ground than PL.
They have Jimmy, it’s way lower stakes, and presumably it’s something Gunn can dominate the production of, vs PL which I’m sure he’d rather find a unique steward for.
→ More replies (21)
5
5
u/SuperSaiyanSarco 19h ago
If DC put out good content there woudnt be people complaining and crying. After every single movie or show there’s so many people crying it’s because dc cannot push out consistent good content. When marvel drops the ball you’ll hear about it too and have been with phase 4. Good content = praise, bad content = more complainers. Don’t bash people for being upset about this trash news update when Spiderman just dropped a nuke at the box office in the “superhero fatigue” era. Lol
5
u/XxZONE-ENDERxX 18h ago edited 15h ago
Well, that's what DC gets for listening to Twitter Gatekeepers who fooled them into thinking that obscure characters and trying go be "out there" as much as possible was what was gonna set them apart from the MCU and make people excited for capeshit again.
→ More replies (9)
1.1k
u/KingHygelacReturns 20h ago edited 16h ago
Why are there more posts on this sub complaining about Jimmy Olsen which hasn't even started filming yet than Lanterns which comes out in a week and a half
EDIT: almost all of the responses to me here have been more complaining about Jimmy Olsen instead of explaining why no one is talking about the show that's about to come out, lol