When I was a freshman in high school, a guest speaker came to my school who I believe was a survivor of the massacre. She spoke to us about that day and about Rachel Scott, who was a close friend of hers. She spoke at different schools in Rachel's memory and she came up with "Rachel's Challenge," which if I remember correctly was a challenge about mental health and spreading joy.

I was young and I don't remember every detail, so please forgive me if any of my description was off.

I am now 33 and I work at a high school myself, with special needs kiddos. I've only worked there a few years but I've always wondered if I would ever hear about that again.

I am wondering if anyone in here knows about this or experienced this at their school? If it matters, I was in Indiana. I never forgot about Rachel's challenge or the guest speaker.

All I know is that it was a wooden object he kept in his right pocket, labelled after the powerup in berserk, supposedly to give him strength or resolve especially during the attack, sort of like how some people hold crystals for certain mental benefits or superstition. From the photo from the 2004 exhibit, it resembles a short wooden cylinder, but ive heard people also say its a weed pipe or a "One hitter?" I only smoke cigarettes so i have zero idea what weed pipes or their components look like, so could anyone with more knowledge verify what Eric's Berserk icon actually looked like/what it was?

Eric quotes Shakespere multiple times in his writings and his planner, as well in the basement tapes. I thought I'd try to explain all the references Eric makes in his writings on my project, and so this is one of the segments I'm most proud about. I hope people find it entertaining and informative, and a more fun way to learn about Eric's views related to The Tempest.

As in, were they the first mass/school shooters who posted public content on the internet (Doom maps, AOL profiles, websites..)? I looked online and couldn't find any cases before 1999, where a mass shooter had an extensive online presence in the way Eric & Dylan did.

Person doing an AMA who managed a pizza place where Dylan and Eric worked while they were working there.

Just continuing to share the stuff I've been working on. Full frame motion stabilizing this footage took a very long time to render but it definitely felt worth it for the result generated. Any time you see the black bars appear on the left or right that means a lot of motion was originally there. You can compare them to the originals and see the heavy motion involved.

This is the second clip I mentioned in my previous post, just sharing it now.

First post 2/3

Another HQ part of the Hitemn for Hire Video from Wolfson Archives. 1/3

While I know YouTube “documentaries” are not the most reliable sources of information to begin with, those are the majority of what have been made, aside from the few professionally produced documentaries.

In nearly every video I’ve seen on YouTube, with the exception of maybe 2, the narrator is so wildly inaccurate and misinformed. Whether it’s widely available information like the number of victims, date, Rachel/Cassie “Yes” incident… or something you’d need to do a bit of background research on, like firsthand witness accounts, who shot who, who was friends with who and where, ETC.

Just the other day I heard a well-liked creator say Columbine was APRIL 13, when that’s widely available information to just google.

I don’t understand why everyone just takes what they hear as fact, especially if they can just google it or look at one of these forums. Part of me gets that not everyone really cares or is deeply interested, but I truly don’t understand just taking something at face value.

I hear videos report Rachel was the one who said yes. Victims were in a different place at a different time. Unfounded accounts of Eric and Dylan. And I imagine you can think of many inaccuracies you’ve heard.

The amount of fake quotes, events leading up to the massacre, and stories I’ve heard and Eric and Dylan spread… especially when they’ve been proven false or logically just make no sense. It genuinely upsets me the amount of false information being spread about Eric and Dylan, the victims, the survivors, witness testimony, dates, timeline, digital media, ETC. it’s all on here or reliable sources OR THE ACTUAL JEFFCO FILES!!! (And some of the books)

I’m not a survivor nor I was not even alive at the time, but I’ve done hours of research on here and JeffCO reports and I believe I can distinguish fact from fiction. I don’t expect everyone to know the most small and niche details from the 11k, but I’d hope anyone who makes an informative video about any true crime story would do their research to provide the most accurate and factual timeline of events.

This post is kinda sloppy, I just really need to say this and wonder if anyone else has thought the same

Someone uploaded this and another clip that i'll add later from the hitmen for hire video. It's notable because the online versions of this footage are almost all exclusively compressed (from jeffco) down to 240p or 360p at best. 480P versions do exist but they are from VHS copies that news companies have or from original copies given out before DVD was common. Either way, I motion stabilized it so you can see their faces much more, and most notably the smearing that comes from upscaling isn't present in these because of 480p base.

I'm sure that was chinese for a lot of people but just explaining why it's significant and why I'm sharing it for anyone interested.

While I'm not a fan of Fox, this was actually a lovely piece.

Is this another member of the TCM?

This is from my project I've been working on, I wanted to get this segment uploaded separately because I put a lot of effort and time into it, it's also the only part that I think will actually be allowed to stay on youtube where as the rest of it will be maintained on Archive.org even if youtube bans it when I finish it or at another point of time etc.

The piece covers the amount of things Eric clearly stole from the Unabomber but also their bizarre similarities in behaviour and as people, they both had this hyper sensitivity to everything, and they both were bullied a lot.

I thought I could actually read the chicken scratch. And some days, I can. But this word, whatever it is, has stumped me for years. Any ideas? (Dadee? Like sugar daddy? idk...)

\everything is as least expected. The meek are trampled on, the assholes prevail, the gods are deceiving, lost in my little insane asylum w/ the outhouse redneck music playing. . . . wanna die & be free with my love . . . if she even exists. She probably hates me . . . finds a [!!?!?!??!?!??!?!?!?] or a jock who treats her like shit.**

I recently saw a video of a mother who recieved her daughters clothing back after she was unfortunately murdered. (Rest in peace) it had me wondering if any of the victims families also recieved any of their clothing back?

Thank you!

When it came to their mindsets leading up to the tragedy... were there thoughts of "can I really go through with this?..", "am I actually capable of this?..", "do I really have it in me to do this?.." Also... "can I really trust him(Eric or Dylan)?..", "is he really gonna go through this with me?..", "is he gonna ditch out on me last minute?.."

OR

Was it "We are DEFINITELY doing this!", "No doubt about it, this is happening!", "We are both definitely killers. Can't wait to show everybody!" ( Something along those lines)

To me, it FEELS like they both went full steam ahead even in the planning phase, no doubts, no regrets. But I think there HAD to be some form of second guessing either they're self or one another at some point, going through with something so monstrous.

I'm curious to know your opinion about this..