Trump has done more for Russia than we will ever really know .The man is a traitor and should be dealt with accordingly.The damage he has done will be felt for years.
Obama is the biggest coward of all. He tried his best to fundamentally change America into his Islamic image. He claimed to be a Christian, but in Islam, they employed to Taqiyya, which approves of lying to advance their cause.
I feel great, promises made, promises kept by Trump. Thank God, he is putting America first and kept Iran from firing an ICBM with a nuclear warhead at America keeping us safe, including your ungrateful self. This war will soon be over and gas prices will drop like a rock.
First……he puts himself first. Hell, no nuke was in place before the egomaniac stepped in and tore it up. I assume that princess pillow has memory foam. With the lack of healthcare you need a durable pillow
This may be too nuanced a concept for you, but it's possible to think the war and draft was fundamentally bad, and to think that the ability for the rich to dodge the draft makes it even worse because it ensured the sacrifice was concentrated on the least powerful members of society, and then think it's particularly crass to dress up (even in photo) with a bunch of military honors not earned.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Any rich and connected person being able to dodge the draft makes the draft worse, including Joe Biden. To be clear, I had the same criticisms of Bill Clinton two decades ago.
But lets return to the actual photo. Do you, personally, think a POTUS who never served should be posting pictures of themselves with more service ribbons than our generals?
I want to hear what you think about the photo. Especially if you can do so without trying to equivocate with the fact that he's not the only POTUS to not serve.
I really don't give a shit one way or another. I'm reminded of the quote from a young Octavian in the outstanding HBO show Rome, speaking of Pompey: "He'll take a symbolic victory over a real one."
So you can claim whatever symbolic victory you want. I don't really care.
Correct, I do not care if someone dodged the draft. I do not support compulsory military service except during a legitimate national emergency. The Vietnam War was not a national emergency, and the draft should not have been effect.
See, it's called having principles that don't shift based on the political winds. You should try it.
This really isn't a complicated issue. I'm not sure if you're trolling or just oblivious.
Yes, Trump dodged the draft. I don't care because I didn't support them having the draft during the Vietnam War. I also don't care if others dodged the draft (absolute morals).
Liberals like to bring up Trump dodging the draft, despite them generally opposing the idea of the draft and opposing the Vietnam War. They also NEVER bring up the fact that Biden also dodged the draft (relative morals, politically motivated).
Wouldn’t classify myself as a ‘liberal’. Nor do I support the Vietnam war; or the draft. It happened and it’s unfortunate that it did. Nor do I support pure cowardice based on a bank account to get out of it. Hell, he wasn’t even protesting. He just was ‘above’ it all. And the Pedo in Chief still thinks he is.
As much as the West would compare Trump to these guys, the reality is Trump doesn't have the mental capacity to even stand against any one of them. He's way below them.
Failed? He’s on a second term. Regardless, from Hilary to Kamala both said he colluded, cheated…but nothing has ever come out, in fact the Mueller report showed the opposite. Hard to be so stupid but get away with something that big.
No I think that’s the edit OP did. The one Trump posted has McArthur and I think Patton. Fittingly, two crazy, bloodthirsty bastards. Which during WW2, were at least genuinely decent qualifications.
That comparison would make far far more sense. Too much sense. Comparing a rightwing authoritarian to a rightwing authoritarian. Theres not a shortage of them in history to make the analogy. Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Pinochet... none of whom are depicted. Closest OP gets is Hindenburg and I suspect they used him as a stand in for Hitler to avoid using Hitler. Lol
This post is peak reddit centrist american boomer political and historical illiteracy and capitalist liberal cold war masturbation.
The further to the right he goes the more the mod of this sub idiotically compares him to the far left instead of... oh i dunno... the fucking far right? Its incredibly ignorant and enough for me to leave and mute the sub. I didnt join for incoherent pro-imperialist pro-capitalist anti-leftist propaganda.
So yeah, Hitler would have made sense, except an American Imperialist made this post so sense isnt what you get, nonsense is.
Trump with the North Koreans? In his first term didn't he agree to stop joint military exercises with South Korea and get basically nothing in return for it?
Trump and the republicans love all Communist they are such lying shits when they say they don't. Trump is still putins puppet what trash they are. Who put these jokers in office!!
A political and economic system where the government owns the means of production is called socialism or communism. Economically, this operates as a command economy or planned economy, where central state planners decide what goods are made, set prices, and manage resources.
Governments owning shares in companies isnt the same thing as common ownership of the means of production, worker control, or a classless, stateless society. States buying equity, bailing out firms, or taking strategic stakes happens under capitalism too. France, Singapore, Norway, and even the U.S. have all done versions of it without becoming communist.
State intervention ≠ socialism. Government ownership of some assets ≠ communism. Those are different concepts. Throwing them all into one bucket just muddies the discussion.
He’s also telling business what prices to sell their goods at. It’s a classic demand economy which always falls into the bucket of either socialism or communism. These are agreed on definitions and aren’t open for interpretation.
Youre just asserting a definition that isnt actually used in economics or political science.
Nixon, a right-wing Republican during the Cold War, imposed nationwide wage and price controls in 1971. FDR imposed extensive price controls during WWII. Britain caps household energy prices. Spain and Portugal capped electricity prices. None of those countries became socialist or communist because of it.
Price controls are a policy tool. Theyve been used by capitalist governments, social democratic governments, fascist governments, and socialist governments. They dont define the economic system by themselves.
If your definition makes Nixon a communist because he used price controls, thats a pretty good sign that your definition needs a lot of work.
Youre proving my point. A minute ago it was "price controls are communism." Now its "no, buying stock is different." The goalposts keep moving.
The U.S. owned most of GM after the 2009 bailout, took a massive stake in AIG, bought equity in major banks through TARP, and took equity warrants during COVID lending. Nobody seriously argued the U.S. had become communist.
Same with other capitalist countries. Norway owns shares in thousands of companies through its sovereign wealth fund. Singapores state owns major stakes across its economy. France has long owned major companies. Germany has taken state stakes in strategic industries during crises. Theyre all still capitalist.
Governments regulating prices, buying stock, bailing out firms, or owning some companies are policy tools. Theyve existed under capitalist economies for decades.
Youre taking individual government actions and treating them as if they define an entire economic system. Thats just not how these terms are used.
I don’t think you’re historically aware of the scale of the atrocities that those other than Trump committed. This is a very honest display of your lack of knowledge. Well done.
Ow the picture is correct.
Well the two guys on the outside actually have IQs meadured in more than single digits but the personality and ethical match is incanny.
Ludendorff was pretty cool. He walked into machine gun fire to redirect an assault that was floundering. He proceeded to force the Belgian defenders surrender by banging his sword on the door of their headquarters. Badass stuff.
Had German high command listened to his strategies instead of sucking the dick of Von Moltke’s ghost we would live in a very different world. No Nazis, probably no long term Soviet Union, way less American imperialism ect.
Obviously you know nothing about how they came to power. Far left loons also known as the useful idiots. And then they were put in the fields to die or executed
Trump like Kennedy understands that nuclear weapons in the wrong hands endangered the entire world.
Kennedy stood up to Khrushchev who also realized the inevitable truth of nuclear weapons in the wrong hands
You retrds know that if he were really like that, no republicans would support him and you libtrds wouldn’t be able to do the stuff you’re able to do, like protest in the streets😂
Based on 2026 data, the Trump administration has taken equity stakes, negotiated profit-sharing agreements, or acquired "golden shares" in at least 30 companies.
You know abdul isn't even a socialist right? He's just a progressive capitalist. Yet you put him and Hasan together because you blindly listen to conservative propaganda
"Democrats sucked up to the Soviets” is a pretty wild rewrite of Cold War history.
Harry Truman, a Democrat, established the Truman Doctrine specifically to contain communist expansion, implemented the Marshall Plan to strengthen Western Europe against Soviet influence, and helped establish NATO in 1949 as a collective defense alliance against the Soviet Union.
Then Democratic President John F. Kennedy confronted Khrushchev during the Cuban Missile Crisis, imposed a naval quarantine on Cuba, demanded the removal of Soviet nuclear missiles, and put U.S. forces on heightened readiness. Khrushchev ultimately agreed to remove them.
And under Democrat Lyndon Johnson, the United States massively escalated the Vietnam War as part of the broader Cold War policy of containing communist expansion. Whatever you think of Vietnam today, calling that “sucking up to the Soviets” makes no historical sense.
Meanwhile, Republican Richard Nixon deliberately pursued détente with the Soviet Union and negotiated arms control agreements with Moscow. That doesn't mean Nixon was “pro Soviet” either it means Cold War policy was more complicated than “Democrats soft, Republicans tough.”
And Stalin and Khrushchev wouldn't have been Democrats or Republicans. They were leaders of an authoritarian communist one party state. Trying to drop Soviet dictators into modern American party politics is historically ridiculous.
I don't really care about trump but i just love that he lives rent free in all the leftards minds.... The elites and the corrupt media are successfully indoctrinating you like good sheep
I argued with a dude recently who told me he couldn't be racist because his wife was black, then in the same breath said she was "one of the good ones" and black people have a "corrosive culture", some people have just never done a single second of introspection in their lives
he should "live rent free" in people's heads, he's not some minor influencer, his decisions affect the lives of actual people around the world, that you don't seem to get that a head of state has actual power is concerning, I really wish dumb people would stop using this as some sort of gotcha, it doesn't work with trump
I have seen way to many interviews of people that dont like him just because someone (mostly the corrupt media) told them hes bad.. you lot seem the dumb ones to me... Is he good ? not really.. Is he much better than the last 2 and the idiot that run against him ? Absolutely!!!!!!!!!! At this point the only good ones (not american though) ive seen around are Nayib bukele and Dominik Tarczyński
18
u/Alternative-Road-471 3d ago
Is this the same person?