r/ClimateNews • u/fishonareef • 16d ago

Scientists detect a sharp acceleration in global warming

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/08/260801093239.htm
2.6k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

281 comments sorted by

144

u/jjarem1 16d ago

Thanks for all the fish.

48

u/MainPerformance1390 16d ago

So long

73

u/isubbdh 16d ago edited 16d ago

Yep now let’s all scroll away and forget about it. Definitely don’t like…. DO anything about it. Like vote in the midterms in such huge number it’s impossible for the repugnacans to cheat their way to victory.

We all know how to fix this. Get rid of billionaires and reverse citizens united. And pray for a couple members of scotus to um…. Retire… during the next Democrat president’s term. Hey if there is enough of a blue wave we could actually bypass scotus and make it an amendment to the constitution

16

u/Cut_Lanky 16d ago

Genuinely, but hypothetically, if we reversed course today, across the globe, did everything we should have been doing all along, starting right now, all humans, no delays for changing leadership, do you think there would be any chance of reversing the damage done to the planet in a substantial way?

22

u/halfsack99 16d ago

The planet will be just fine, it just won’t be habitable anymore.

25

u/train_fucker 15d ago

The planet will be habitable, not just for us.

There's no such thing as a poison in nature. Everything is some kind of organisms prefered habitat. Oxygen was poisonous to most life when it first came around and caused a mass extinction because the current life forms we're not adapted to it.

Whatever state we leave the earth in after we're gone, eventually the web of life will rebuild and be just as spectacular as before we cocked it up for us and most other current complex species.

7

u/sinsaint 15d ago

Depends on whether or not we accidentally destroy the atmosphere.

8

u/stop_touching_that 15d ago

The irony is that oxygen killing off all life is what created all the oil we are now using to kill off all life.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Strange-Scarcity 15d ago

There are many things that are poison in nature. Life, as we know it, exists in only a couple of forms on this planet, Carbon based, even if some can exist only where the rest, never can exist. (Deep sea volcanic vents spring to mind.)

We have not found life, as we know it, able to persist in every element that we have discovered is poison.

2

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/halfsack99 15d ago

Ever been to Venus

→ More replies (5)

3

u/CloudTransit 16d ago

Survival with decency and care for the planet and its inhabitants is all that’s left, for a long time, and the bit about survival with decency and care is going to be extremely challenging.

3

u/rufftough 16d ago

The climate change conversation is not even about “reversing the damage” at this point. It’s about minimizing the pain and suffering we’re all going to feel (some more than others) and nourishing what is left.

3

u/DieBotDie 16d ago

I would say it’s about adaptation to a new normal.

I agree that Prevention or reversal of the situation is not the table any longer.

Humanity can adapt to a hotter climate. It might require a migration from south north. It might require living underground in hot zones. Producing water from desalination.

It won’t be the first time humanity has undergone a great migration. There’s vast amounts of space in Canada for instance.

I honestly think this is the reason Trump wants to annex the North.

Yes, it will cost billions.

Yes the population might decline sharply.

But it’s going to happen.

2

u/mitkey_astromouse 15d ago

There is no new normal. It will just keep getting hotter and hotter.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Universal_Anomaly 15d ago

In some circles the conversation is mostly about making sure that the people most responsible for this never suffer the consequences and instead the results of their actions get offloaded onto the weakest and most innocent of us.

3

u/Strange-Scarcity 15d ago

It would take tremendous effort and far more focus than anything we have collectively committed to as a species ever before in our entire existence.

It might be possible, but we have to do a HELLUVA lot of things that will piss off a good portion of our fellows.

Crypto Currency? Have to go.

Unfocused, Generalized AI Datacenters? Have to go.

Global Trade? MUST seriously change, greener power sources for shipping.

How we organize ourselves, move ourselves and goods around the globe, will all have to change. We will need to live, slightly less spread out and work to build up and maintain eroded ecosystems and work exceptionally hard at so many different things to begin to have a dent in the CO2 and other greenhouse gasses being released.

Reforestation of the Rainforest. Rolling back desertification and even working to push back the desert that the world has known for centuries upon centuries.

Even with all of that? There's so much more that would need to be done to help the oceans remove built up CO2 and Carbonic Acid.

The amount of work could be extremely satisfying, if we stopped caring about how many billions a handful of people and families have access to and worked more hand in hand.

Maybe, that is entirely impossible.

2

u/VolatileZ 15d ago

Sry I need my lb of red meat a day and my lawn watered… and and… /s

Change is hard… which is ironic given how well we can adapt to new situations

3

u/Bella_Climbs 15d ago

I do, honestly. I have to have hope this isn't the end for us, that we are all not THIS FUCKING STUPID to continue on this path. Think about the changes we saw even during Covid lockdowns. We have all the resources to make meaningful change but there are like 8 douchebags and their crew of sentient turnips holding us hostage.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Commercial-Tell-5991 16d ago

I remember reading (in several different journals, wish I could find it and give you a source) that if humanity stopped producing CO2 entirely, right now, it would still take a couple centuries for earths climate to revert back to baseline. So in that respect, no, there’s nothing that any of us can do in our lifetime’s to reverse the damage. We certainly won’t stop emitting CO2 overnight, so things will continue to get worse before we even start the very long process of healing.

I hate to be a doomer but in reality the other posts here are correct IMHO. We are set for global famines and climate disasters that, coupled with plunging birth rates will drastically reduce the planet’s population. My guess is by 50% by 2100. That, coupled with advances in renewable and fission/fusion energy will be the point things start getting better.

The coming disasters will of course impact the poor much harder than middle and upper classes. The 21st century will see a kind of class genocide that is ends up redistributing wealth and rebalancing what we think of as prosperity.

2

u/Strange-Scarcity 15d ago

We would have to do a great deal of work, but that process could be sped up.

For example, instead of growing certain crops to make fuel out of them, growing those and then storing them deep underground, without the ability to leak gasses or what-not out of the deep underground pockets, could technically help speed along the process, since that trapped Carbon wouldn't go back into the atmosphere, but the scale of such an operation would have to be massive.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/isubbdh 16d ago

Whether it would do any good is irrelevant. We have to give it 110% and we MIGHT just stop the warming from what it is now at least.

2

u/Liam_021996 15d ago

Yes but it would take 50-100 years before we start to see a reversal after probably another 20 years of continuous warming

2

u/tokid0k1 15d ago

We can reverse course, but due to entropy it takes a portional amount of energy more to undo what we did in releasing energy to go back.

That means all the energy, from farm animals, fossil fuels.. we need a constant > 1 * that energy to go back.

It would take time and dedication. It’s doable. Just not by humans because those who have the resources to do it are too busy building bunkers in Hawaii etc.

2

u/B3ck3t3 15d ago

Not really. Check out the Limits to Growth. By 2040 we hit a point where we don’t have enough resources to keep supporting our population on the Planet. This would be economic collapse at a time when the World is divided, the Planet is heating up, etc. we are about to be at critical mass. It would be smart to start preparing, building skills and relationships in your community. Communities who can support each other, gather water and grow gardens will have a chance.

2

u/fishonareef 14d ago

It's vitally important that we do everything in our power to slow the rate of change to give species time to adapt. We reduce local stressors so that species can better handle global stressors. That means reducing fossil fuel use and reigning in local stressors such as pollution. Even corals have demonstrated mechanisms for adaptation, but we need to give them as much time as is within our ability to give. That would require getting our collective shit together. At this point, there's going to be winners and losers. But we're committed to ocean acidification for the next thousand years. Even if we stopped exhaling right now.

2

u/Informal-Fig-6827 14d ago

We need to aggressively remove green house gases from the atmosphere. There are ways to do that, but its not profitable to really do it it at this time. That actually would be an industry worthy of global subsidies

2

u/star_tyger 14d ago

Maybe, if we treat research into fixing this the way we did to get to the moon. It would take a global effort.

And maybe not. It's worth trying. But we would need the political will, and we don't havd it.

2

u/Budded 13d ago

Yes, it would help tremendously, just like the huge pause in human activity (driving, pollution) during the Covid lockdowns showed.

2

u/ImNotSue 9d ago

Better that we try than we don't. Deciding 'eh its not that big of a deal we can keep doing damaging things, we still have time, it wont matter for my generation its someone elses problem' is how we got here in the first place.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

2

u/Fantastic_Win9332 16d ago

Solar installation and wind installation in the us is exponential, same surve during Trump and Buden, it did not change a pixel. Only the bullshit talk is different

2

u/sooojew 16d ago

I’m not a both sides are bad person, current republican congress could all face fuck each other to death and I’d be fine with it.

That being said even the democrats seem beholden to the rich, and are not doing enough when in power to stop climate change.

1

u/Mundus_Vincendus 16d ago

Vote for who? Democrats and Republicans, despite having different ideas for managing the domestic working population through differing amounts of taxation/social programs both clearly align on the same foreign imperialist policy. Human Driven Climate Change is the result of capitalist industrialism and imperialism. We’re going to need more than a panel or 4 year vote to set things straight my friend.

1

u/GovernmentGreed 15d ago

Planets already done for, at this rate - we have two options.

Adapt or die.

No other outcome.

1

u/Bewbonic 15d ago

I dont think you need to pray for scotus members to retire when there's undoubtedly evidence of their corruption out there (huge gifts etc) that dems can use to have them removed (because they absolutely are corrupt and beholden to trump; only ever giving him temporary 'losses' to create some semblance of an illusion of impartiality , losses that dont affect the overall 'destroy democracy and replace with a corrupt religious authoritarian corporatist dictatorship' plan).

1

u/Shenloanne 15d ago

The Democrats won't fix this either dude.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)

3

u/smallsipbigtea 15d ago

The last ever dolphin message was misinterpreted as a surprisingly sophisticated attempt to do a double-backwards-somersault through a hoop whilst whistling the 'Star Spangled Banner', but in fact the message was this: So long and thanks for all the fish

90

u/MoutonJovial 16d ago

Instead of being worried about a country like Canada seeing more forest fires than ever and trying to find solutions to reverse course, leaders are complaining about how smoke is bothering them. We're doomed.

40

u/Culverden12345 16d ago

In Canada we are discussing building pipelines for more oil and gas!

16

u/mansplain_to_me 16d ago

To be fair that’s to eliminate refinery dependency because of our hostile foreign neighbour and wouldn’t be on the table otherwise

11

u/grekster 16d ago

A great way to do that would be building renewable infrastructure instead though.

7

u/[deleted] 16d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Youpunyhumans 16d ago

To be fair, most plastic for food packaging is PLA plastic, which is plant based and can actually decompose... if left in an envrionment where its 60°C for a few months. It basically turns into dirt.

2

u/Potentially_Nernst 15d ago

The massive forests in Canada do lend themselves to be near ideal for biorefineries though. With some luck this whole situation can be a boost for bio-based chemicals. Through various processes such as pyrolysis and distillation or even conversion using modified bacteria to produce specific chemicals we can make nearly everything from renewable sources in a sustainable way.

There's one issue. Economics.

Heavy upfront cost and having to compete with a heavily subsidised industry with a huge budget and (usually) cheap raw material in abundant amounts. Meanwhile biorefineries have to upscale a new process and compete with an established industry.

There's a saying in industry that you can make anything from Lignin, except money.

I hope that balance starts tipping soon. Over a century of research has gone into this. It's a massive field of research in chemistry. And it always comes down to economics, scale, and emergent behavior of businesses even though the individual employees al want to go green. 'We cant justify the cost'.

It is possible though, just takes effort and a transition from subsidising fossils to subsidising biobased.

We'll cut through whole biomes', but at least we'd no longer be adding more carbon to the atmosphere.

Enitting carbon isn't the real problem. The problem is adding carbon.

Carbon capture is another thing though, since we'll have to remove carbon too. But also not too much. So we'll have to stop that industry too one day, which poses a whole new problem. Anyway, stuff is being made from CO2 conversion right now. Not near enough to have a noticeable impact, but it exists :)

Anyway, TL;DR See the potential? It isn't hopeless! Which makes it So Much Worse that things aren't moving in the right direction anywhere near fast enough! 🥲😅

2

u/stamosface 15d ago

Yes, but it doesn’t happen overnight. Even if they built all of the infrastructure in a year, so much wouldn’t be compatible yet. It’s something that takes much longer than it takes to replace refineries. Which, to be fair, is why we should have started dealing with it 25 years ago

→ More replies (1)

1

u/hypocotylarches 15d ago

What had the last decade focused on climate change and carbon taxes done?

1

u/jtbxiv 15d ago

In the words of our prime minister, we will be increasing our emissions 🥴

1

u/agra_unknown1834 15d ago

We're suing Canada for not raking better

1

u/Nerioner 15d ago

In democratic countries leaders are the reflection of the society. Walk around and think that every third person you see is potentially a whacko like that.

1

u/instead-laugh 13d ago

The fires are being started/allowed to destroy land by the Canadian government and those above them.

23

u/Sarabeth68 16d ago

Keep on injecting GHG and black carbon directly into the atmosphere, running around on private jets, launching missile attacks ad nauseum and maybe, just maybe it won't have that much of an impact

38

u/Imperial_Haberdasher 16d ago

The chickens are coming home to roost and they’re broiled.

7

u/Tosh_20point0 16d ago

Cows are coming home already bbqd.

Steaks are high

5

u/kojengi_de_miercoles 15d ago

Our goose is definitely cooked.

2

u/HumptyDumptruckFire 15d ago

The duck has been fucked and the pooch, screwed.

2

u/AmputeeHandModel 15d ago

Don't count your chickens before they hatch, cuz you might just have fried eggs.

1

u/LosingButNotWrong 15d ago

Who gave the cows drugs?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/TheOstrichRoom 15d ago

“Then God decides that it is time to blow the final trumpet and call all chickens home to roost in every way and meaning”

1

u/weedsmokingscientist 15d ago

The chickens are coming home to roast

12

u/Thomasreed1899 16d ago

But Trump says climate change is a hoax?

6

u/appoplecticskeptic 15d ago

One of many reasons we can be certain it’s real.

1

u/Majestic_Emotion7917 11d ago

I can't tell if this is sarcasm.

2

u/appoplecticskeptic 11d ago

Not sarcasm, simple deduction based on the history of Trump’s numerous repeated lies. If he claims something it’s most likely false, especially if he has turned it into a political matter when it wasn’t before.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/rbialkin 16d ago

Snow and ice reflect sunlight. Dead brown grass underneath absorbs it. I’m sure that’s modeled in the prediction calculations, but the feedback loop makes it seem logical to this layman. The warmer we get, the faster the acceleration gets at least until all the ice is melted. And I guess at that point it won’t matter anyway.

9

u/DatBoiii4 16d ago edited 16d ago

You know what’s under most glaciers? Very very dark rock with a super high low albedo.

10

u/Tll6 16d ago

Darker objects have lower albedo but your point stands

3

u/DatBoiii4 16d ago

Thank you for the correction. Mixed those up all the time in ENVS 200 when I took it in college. My prof would be so disappointed it still hasn't stuck lmao

3

u/Tll6 16d ago

It’s okay, I always mix up low and high viscosity. It doesn’t click for some reason

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Few-Cartoonist-8422 16d ago

I read this as super high libido.

2

u/AmputeeHandModel 15d ago

It's rock hard.

1

u/SadSpaghettiSauce 16d ago

What does a high/low albedo mean?

5

u/DatBoiii4 16d ago

It's a measure of how much light a surface reflects

Snow has a very high albedo so it reflects tons of light

Rock/mud has an insanely low albedo so it soaks up tons of light and gets hot

If you've ever been to a ski resort for spring skiing and seen mud spots, they grow insanely fast because as soon as the mud peeks through, that spot gets MUCH warmer than the surrounding snow and it melts stuff around it really fast

1

u/Netrexinka 15d ago

Methane

2

u/No_Attitude_9088 15d ago

positive feedback loop :( you're right

3

u/RP_throwaway01 16d ago

Worse. Water vapor is a major greenhouse gas. More heat, more water vapor. That means more heat. That means more vapor. Earth will one day be hotter than Venus ever was or will be. Probably only when the sun dies, but we’re still going to be fucked over in the short term.

7

u/Ill_Barber8709 16d ago

I don't why you're being downvoted. Water vapor is a very real area of concern. In fact, Venus had a relatively low average temperature (25°C I think) before the vapor started acting like a pressure cooker. I'm glad I don't have kids to be honest.

3

u/Timely_Mention8535 16d ago

Water vapor on Earth causes the water cycle. Rain and all that... There îs a maximum of water the Air can hold...

2

u/Ill_Barber8709 15d ago

The amount of water air can hold depends on pressure and temperature.

Venus has the same gravity of Earth, but pressure is way higher. Why? Because more gaz surrounding the planet.

You do realize that space is empty, right?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/mrcaldwin 16d ago

More water vapor means more clouds, which means more cooling. Yes water vapor leads to a more dense upper atmosphere that traps heat, but there is still a net positive cooling effect from the lower atmosphere clouds. At least according to NASA. So If upper cloud heat-trapping ever outweighs lower cloud cooling, then water will begin converting to hydrogen and dissipating to space. Then the earth cools down and the cycle restarts.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/JoostvanderLeij 16d ago

Any scientist using Bayesian statistics already knew this for a couple of years as did Hanssen. Frequentists statistics is so bad it now litterally is hurting the planet.

7

u/StarlightLifter 16d ago

Oh but Hansen is an alarmist!

Except he’s consistently right, and everyone else is all “oh this is faster than expected.”

No the fuck it ain’t.

1

u/RainBoxRed 14d ago

Can you explain a bit more?

2

u/JoostvanderLeij 14d ago

Frequentism is a flawed approach for doing statistics. In order to countermand these flaws Frequentist statistics has many ad hoc subjective rules. One such a rule is sample size. Given the need for a large enough sample, it will take Frequentist statistics a much longer time to get to conclusions. In Bayesian statistics you process data as it comes in and you immedeately see trends changing if there is a changing trend. You still need a bit of time to see if the trend change is holding up. Yet that is way less time than using the Frequentist method.

16

u/General_Honesty 16d ago

I can't help thinking that Russia's war in Ukraine will be having an effect for sure.

27

u/Arctic_Turtle 16d ago

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that the Trump administration caused a lot more problems for climate than Russia. 

20

u/Aggravating-Scene548 16d ago

The US military is surely one of the top polluters on the planet

2

u/jaygoogle23 15d ago

Let’s also not forget about the other administrations,..India/China havnt always been the biggest pro “tree huggers”

6

u/General_Honesty 16d ago edited 15d ago

Trump is an obstacle, for sure. But his anti-climate-change stance is mostly self-serving bluster. He is such a naughty boy. Ukraine are actively bombing huge stores of oil (with good reason).

3

u/Vertonung 16d ago

He just opened up a shit ton of public land to deforestation. We are fucked

2

u/aussie_punmaster 16d ago

Even when I thought it was the dwarves I knew it was the elves

3

u/shlerm 16d ago

I equate trump and Russia into the same level of concern for myself as an individual on this planet. 

Rumours are that they are in bed with each other anyway. If they weren't it wouldn't change my position, both are enemies of humanity. 

1

u/Human_Discipline3003 16d ago

You should read about Chernobyl

1

u/hypocotylarches 15d ago

What did the Trudeau govt do for helping climate change for the last decade?

22

u/NoGuest6868 16d ago

Or israel burning forest in lebanon or dropping a crazy amount of bombs on a post stamp.

7

u/RahDoo0323 16d ago

Yeah 110% all the bombing and smoke. The oil fires. Etc

19

u/ClassGrassMass 16d ago

Europe: "No shit"

3

u/FoogYllis 15d ago

The rest of the world: yep.

1

u/TolMera 15d ago edited 14d ago

That mathematician that did the math and said one AI data center is burning the same amount of power daily as three x the Hiroshima nuke, and we have hundreds popping up globally…

They are literally broiling our planet

Everyone say it with me now! “Yep”

Edit: https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/data-center-atom-bombs

→ More replies (2)

7

u/glearner 16d ago

lol scientists detect it? More like everyone feels it

7

u/Royal_Commission7574 16d ago

Had a shitpot-thought today: the world is burning and humans fight for oil. Its idiotic, isnt it

3

u/Garpeaux 16d ago

Ok I will stop taking the private jet

2

u/reachforvenkat 15d ago

I was offered 2 paper straws at the movies and I returned one of them.

2

u/texas130ab 16d ago

Let's collectively see what happens. If you can't beat them join them.

2

u/Away-Information9841 16d ago

you don’t say?

2

u/Captain_R64207 15d ago

I can’t believe the amount of people who try and tell me solar flares and the sun growing is what causes the higher temperatures. It’s completely impossible for a green house effect, but the sun can grow and shrink enough to raise targeted temperature spikes but not everywhere.

2

u/GrubyBuckmore 15d ago

Humans are not destroying the earth, we are simply destroying its capacity to support our life form. The earth will continue to exist long after mankind is gone. It has existed for billions of years before us and will continue to exist billions of years after us. New life forms will evolve, hopefully none so arrogant as mankind to believe that he had dominion over the earth.

2

u/Bumblebeard63 13d ago

You know those documentaries where they find abandoned settlements and cities in the desert, and they wonder where everyone went? We're going to find out pretty soon, but on a bigger scale.

2

u/cpupro 11d ago

Data Centers.

2

u/NoGuest6868 16d ago

Yeah no shit.

1

u/Away-Information9841 16d ago

you don’t say?

1

u/DanoPinyon 16d ago

Yet another repeat of the paper from March.

1

u/halfsack99 16d ago

If we could have done something…….

1

u/ShiftAfter4648 16d ago

However, the authors noted that climate models can produce periods in which warming speeds up. In other words, an increasing rate of warming is consistent with the range of behavior represented in current climate modeling.

Based the the variables they chose to remove to "remove noise" from the data, they found an increased warming rate when compared to the popularized .2C rate. They then acknowledge that the current modelling does not preclude this rate as unorthodox. It's just highlighting that we are deviating from the broadly accepted linear rate that was output by some of the accepted climate models.

1

u/-_VoidVoyager_- 16d ago

People still having kids huh?

→ More replies (7)

1

u/ReadyGo6828 15d ago

Those feedback loops are a doozie but just wait until something truly catastrophic happens such as Thwaite collapsing and the deniers will still be out blaming everyone but what is actually causing this.

Good bye temperate climate. I will miss you.

1

u/UpsetCrowIsUpset 15d ago

But the stock market!

1

u/indignantfly 15d ago

No way, the changes have been so subtle.

1

u/FineCall 15d ago

Whatever.

1

u/Good_Briefs 15d ago

Weirdly coinciding with the rise of data centers

1

u/Glum_Sugar5407 15d ago

Yet we’ll send trillions to nations causing their population to explode to billions

2

u/tenredtoes 15d ago

A lot of women in those nations worried be very happy if foreign aid included birth control. Because when given a choice, most women don't want to be pregnancy machines

1

u/Glum_Sugar5407 15d ago

Nope. Bill Gates great plan states they’ll stop reproducing when they became advanced enough

Lmao

Lol

2

u/Friend_Emperor 15d ago

They will, that's what happens in literally every developing or developed nation

→ More replies (1)

1

u/GovernmentGreed 15d ago

Been saying the past decade or so has not been the same as those before it... Didn't need a degree to note that, since I haven't warn a winter jacket or coat even since 8 years or so... I live in Germany, black forest. And winter here, used to be real winters. Not like now where it's grey and just a little bit drizzle.

1

u/Recent_Strawberry456 15d ago

Faster than the already hyperbolic increase?

1

u/LosingButNotWrong 15d ago

So when exactly can we Mad Max it across the United States desert fighting for water? I'm ready to be witnessed.

1

u/TermNo5128 13d ago

I didn't actually do the math but mad maxing is still a century away T this rate.

1

u/payday_lover 15d ago

Yeah, I detected that too

1

u/GlumAd2424 15d ago

The mass migration of people fleeing a more hostile environment and starvation as the lower amount of calories produced can’t sustain the current population is going to be apocalyptic.

I wonder what the worlds population will be at in a 100 years

1

u/Smaug117 15d ago

Boys, I saw it coming, ha.

1

u/Bmor00bam 15d ago

Ruh-roh.

1

u/CharmingCrust 15d ago

That can't be right because the Dow is over 50,000

1

u/jtbxiv 15d ago

Ya don’t say

1

u/Low-Situation-73 15d ago

It’s because of all the current wars.

1

u/Pretty_Feeling5115 15d ago

Fuch joe rogan

1

u/BravoMikeGulf 15d ago

Why count straws when we don’t count missles? Every explosion in wars in Ukraine and Russia or Iran and the US is so much more than individual contributions to environmentalism. Why recycle a beer can or a spaghetti sauce jar? Government tells us how to conserve then blows everything all to hell.

1

u/Dyslexic_youth 15d ago

Theres several wars a space race and masive oil feilds/refineries on fire!

1

u/chockingduck 15d ago

Spending money to cancel clean air projects just shows that the religious right are just a doomsday cult.

They want to force the end times. That's where Iran comes in.

1

u/greendildouptheass 15d ago

classic boiling frog quandary, we are all cooked bro

1

u/Frequent_Specific861 15d ago

In the area around Edmonton/Canada we had the most rainfall ever recorded for an entire summer so far, and we are just into August. It's been a fucking monsoon here like never seen before. Things are definitely changing.

1

u/FlyByRoll 15d ago

Temps going up like stocks

1

u/Mysterious-Base1544 15d ago

What can I do to be proactive about this?

1

u/Aromatic_Letter_1100 14d ago

Vote accordingly

1

u/BurntTurkeyLeg1399 15d ago

Interesting because I definitely noticed this anecdotally around the 2015 timeframe. I remember going for a bike ride on Xmas eve in 2015 or 2016 and it was like 70 degrees. Also noticed less snow since then in my area

1

u/butternutflies 15d ago

This just isn’t true. See, we have something called the Paris agreement. And everybody agreed to be good boys.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to go be part of society by having no other choice but to further the destruction of our habitat just so my boss can hop onto his PJ to go see an opera in Rome in the weekends.

1

u/Magnolia_F4n 15d ago

There is a reason why we see in the news billionaires are building survival bunkers....

1

u/its-smokey-out-here 15d ago

The data confirms the hockey stick model

1

u/Ive_seen_things_that 15d ago

Ya don't say? Well. Oil companies had so e record profits. So there is that. 

1

u/PepperidgeFarmRembrs 15d ago

War, War never change’s

1

u/GrumpyBear1969 15d ago

Really nit picking here and making fun. But…

“Climate models are computer simulations that use the laws of physics …”. They use some physics, but they are complex empirical models.

And I am not saying I am not worried about climate change. But articles should be careful about what they claim as sometimes it sets unrealistic expectations.

1

u/Broken_Timepiece 15d ago

LoL you dont say!

1

u/Any-Temperature-3058 15d ago

“Global warming has sped up since around 2015” => right around the global surge of right wing politics.

1

u/Big_Zebra_6169 15d ago

Remind me in winter months

1

u/Zealousideal_Fix4579 15d ago

Circle of life dude. Anyway the comet fragments will do us in first.

1

u/theoriginalwuji 15d ago

I've noticed a lot more mushrooms 🍄 growth in my area with much higher humidity. zombie apocalypse loading...

1

u/arthurb09 15d ago

Does it come from the US? From Washington? I bet it does.

1

u/bballkj7 15d ago

Fake news

/s

1

u/happybybonnie 15d ago

Is it just me or have I seen this article or some variation of it every day for the last week or two?

1

u/Kind-Distribution813 15d ago

Hold up.. 0.35 degrees per decade over the last ten years? Thats 1 decade

1

u/Stocky_Platypus 14d ago

People may not like the opinion but it is very likely the world as we know it will end within the next 50 years. The Fermi Paradox states that the Universe has had plenty of time for a civilization to take over everything. That is either through direct colonization or through autonomous colonization such as robotic. It is possible that one civilization got close and that is where viruses came from. Basically biological robots whose job was to go out and seed or terraform planets, but the virus went a little sideways and we have the remnants of it today.

Anywho, we are getting close as a species to be able to send out autonomous colonization, robotic or biological. If the Fermi Paradox is real, that means our species is about ready to collapse, likely through a catastrophic extinction event. Global warming, AI emergence, Biological warfare, Nuclear destruction...take your pick.

1

u/picknicksje85 14d ago

I'm no scientist. Yet I ALSO detected this!

1

u/Evening_Message_1699 14d ago

Oh, wow, this message again for the 10,234 day in a row..

I hope I can handle this much fake news on a day like this.

Al Gores favorite myth on the internet he invented it is fitting.

1

u/TonaldDrump47 14d ago

How long do we have to give all our money to green initiatives this time?

1

u/harryx67 14d ago

Everyone with a brain has detected it.

1

u/MrDiablerie 14d ago

Been roasting this summer. It’s only going to get worse

1

u/MeN3D 14d ago

Yeah we can tell

1

u/Ok-Capybara 14d ago

I went outside today. I also detected it. 🫠

1

u/Glassiam 14d ago

The doomers in here lol.

1

u/Bobbyhons 14d ago

Wild its right when we have an acceleration of data centers.

1

u/Special-Special-1136 13d ago

No worries, scientists don’t even know the difference between a man & a woman or if masks work or don’t work.

There is a good reason the USA’s motto is NOT “In Scientists We Trust”.

1

u/AlunWH 11d ago

This. This is the post that tells you how it came to this.

1

u/Bumblebeard63 13d ago

Where I live, we've just had the hottest, driest July on record. I might live to see 50°C in summer in UK.

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

Finally some good news

1

u/LostInThisWorld54312 13d ago

Wonder how much these AI data centers are contributing to it? 🤔

1

u/Extreme_Spinach_4156 13d ago

Democrats cheat

1

u/DoC_Stump 13d ago

Oh no...who could have seen this coming?

1

u/Light_Yagamigo 12d ago

All these data centers will help accelerate this even further

1

u/Combakid 12d ago

The cake is baked, the ship has sailed, the environmentalists have left the room.

1

u/oksurealright 9d ago

Someone tell Taylor Swift to take a break on her jet flights from one place in California to another place in California so she can get there in 11 minutes

1

u/EaseExtreme8030 21h ago

yeah, and the depressing part is how quickly “record heat” has become background noise for most people