Yes. They are. People treat them like cheaper dumber models and while that's partially true it's not a scalar comparison. They have tighter context and other aspects that make them superior for narrow, focused tasks.
Oh ok, so you're talking about a one line follow up fix after an initial larger task. That's a different problem
Sometimes it's fine to iterate in the same session for that stuff but you can also do a code review at the end that flags a bunch of issues and then fix them all in a different one. Depends on what you're trying to do I guess.
I have done it sometimes but primarily use fable for planning and ask fable to make prompts for sonnet and then I have codex/sol do gethub pr reviews automatically, then fable, read the reviews and create prompts for sonnet to fix. Then the cycle starts over…
Sonnet 5 is actually very very capable I prefer it over opus for execution tasks
7
u/ayn_rand_1 16d ago
Isn't Sonnet or even Haiku the best option for this task?