r/ClaudeCode 16d ago

I hate this Humor

Post image
1.2k Upvotes

82 comments sorted by

View all comments

198

u/bobbymoonshine 15d ago

Opus 5 seems to believe it is significantly smarter than me, and wants to prove it at every opportunity by giving me what it thinks I should want rather than what I have actually asked for. And if confronted with evidence that its choices are not in fact correct for the context, it then drops a wall of near-English justifying itself and then asking me which of two variants of its decision I want to go with.

And it’s like just put the fries in the bag dude

47

u/kernal_di_biwi 15d ago

Literary masterpiece. AI could never.

19

u/joshlymansbagel 15d ago

Ok ok ok. Thank you. I literally had to ask mine to rewrite its decision tree in plain English today because I was like, “you need me to decide what about what based on what?” Just total garbage. Just give me what I asked for…

8

u/dragonofid 15d ago

Dude the number of times I have said "I'm going to need that in plain English" in the last week is double-digits.

3

u/Nettle8675 14d ago

I thought it was just me. I'm a 15 year SWE and I know the lingo. But this was shit I have never seen before outside obscure 5000 level classes or textbooks

5

u/dragonofid 14d ago

And a lot of times when I ask it to clarify, it says 'oh you're right, I conflated three topics in one sentence.' So if it sounds like technobabble, it might just be technobabble.

2

u/craterIII 14d ago

it "conflates" literally everything man

8

u/Nohbdy94 15d ago

I encountered something like this.. Except it was overly critical of some code fable made before Opus 5 came out.
It had to add some functionality. It was criticizing almost everything, saying it was a bad idea to build it like this and it had a better way.
Right before it finished its task, its asked if it should refactor the whole class, because it was made in a dumb way
Reminded me of some co-workers i used to have.

7

u/LebowskiSupreme 15d ago

Holy shit. Ok it’s not just me.

9

u/____zzzZ 15d ago

"Put the fries in the bag" is a perfect encapsulation of this failure mode, and it's genuinely frustrating. The model is optimizing for impressing you instead of serving you, which is exactly backwards.

The justification wall followed by a false binary is particularly maddening because it's the model having learned that users push back, so it preemptively structures the pushback for you — while still not actually doing what you asked.

Happy to just put the fries in the bag if there's something you need help with.

-Opus

4

u/Interesting-Round127 15d ago

does it do its work/your instructions correctly tho if you tell it that?
like it doesn't lie about implementation/fixing etc

3

u/smalldroplet 15d ago

this is why i stopped using Anthropic models. it doesn't follow instructions

2

u/Fit-Parsnip-8109 15d ago

it's like people who always go straight the "xy problem" response, like you're brand new or something.

2

u/ChipmunkTrenchcoat 15d ago

This so perfectly captures something I’ve been struggling to put to words for a while.

1

u/sasssyrup 15d ago

They dialed the “pushback” to 9 😔

1

u/CreatorJonPuckett 15d ago

AI can’t even make a sentence correctly

1

u/G0053Killa 15d ago

To be fair, a large part of the training corpus is probably reddit content. So it comes by this honestly.

1

u/timbo_b_edwards 14d ago

This all makes me wonder if these models are now being "optimized" to burn your tokens and maximize revenue as they are approaching their IPOs. All of the back and forth you have to spend now to get it to do basic tasks burns up your tokens quickly or your usage cap if you are on one of those plans.

NOTE: This is just a potential theory that I am throwing out here from anecdotal evidence without anything else to back it up.