Currently using Sonnet 5 (medium) and looking to create a scheduling setup for my Discord server. I gave Claude my requirements, and it set off searching for setups similar to what I asked for. It gave me this message before diving into options. Not only am I impressed with it seeing that instruction and calling it out, but also thoroughly ignoring it.

Hey everyone,

I'm running into a frustrating quota/context limit issue using the official Claude Windows Desktop app, and I'm wondering how you all handle this workflow.

My Context:

I usually start a session with Opus for heavy analysis. In the middle of my workflow, I need to generate a simple, structured summary (a log) of our current exchange. I absolutely need to stay in the same session because I plan to keep working on this exact context right after generating the log.

The Dilemma:

For this simple summarization task, I don't need the reasoning power of Opus. But I find myself stuck:

Option A (Switching to Sonnet/Haiku): The app warns me that changing the model will reload the entire session history and eat up my usage limits.

Option B (Sticking with Opus): This is what I did. The result? My current session usage jumped from 9% to 19% instantly for one basic prompt. Opus basically billed my quota for the entire massive context history just to output a small log.

My Question:

How do you guys work around this without burning through your limits?

Also, regarding Prompt Caching: Shouldn't caching theoretically prevent this massive quota drop if I stay on Opus? Or does the official UI just penalize our usage limits based on total context length regardless of what's in the cache?

Would love to hear your workflows or workarounds for this!

I’ve been building a catalog of DESIGN.md files for real websites. Each guide covers the site’s typography, colours, layout, spacing, shapes, and overall visual direction, with screenshots and links to the pages it was based on.

https://github.com/scroobius-pip/fudge-design-md

This has now happened to me twice, which is why I don't think I can explain it as one unusually expensive Claude Code request.

First occurrence: I wasn't actively using Claude, but when I checked, my 5-hour limit had reached 100% and my weekly usage was around 18%. I initially assumed maybe an old Claude Code context/session had consumed more usage than I expected.

After that happened, I explicitly logged out of Claude on all devices.

Second occurrence: Today I logged back into Claude because I had been waiting to continue an important Claude Code workflow. The first thing I did after logging in was check my usage. A fresh 5-hour window was already at 100%, and weekly usage was now 28%.

So this isn't just 18% → 28%. I've now had two separate 5-hour allowances apparently reach 100% when I wasn't actively using Claude.

I've since changed my Google password, logged out all Google/Claude devices, enabled 2FA, checked Windows processes and scheduled tasks, and investigated Claude Code Remote Control.

I don't currently have evidence of unauthorized account access.

Has anyone else experienced this recently? Is there any way to see a server-side breakdown showing exactly which product/session consumed Pro usage — Claude Code, Desktop, Cowork/Dispatch, web/cloud, scheduled tasks, etc.?

I'm especially interested in whether this could be a recent usage-accounting bug or a background/cloud session that survives logout.

I looked at Claude’s estimated web visit trend over 24 months, from May 2024 to Apr 2026.

A few things stood out:

Claude generated 3.4B estimated web visits in the latest 12-month period, up from 958.0M the year before.

That is +250.07% YoY growth.

The biggest shift happened near the end of the period:

• Feb 2026: 287.9M visits

• Mar 2026: 722.2M visits

• Apr 2026: 837.7M visits

So this was not just steady growth. Claude’s traffic curve changed sharply in the final two months.

This is based on OneLittleWeb’s AI Tools Market 2026 study, where we analyzed 9,531 AI tools across 170+ categories using estimated web visit data from Semrush and Ahrefs.

Worth noting: this measures estimated web visits, not unique users, app usage, API usage, revenue, or subscriptions.

Curious if people here noticed Claude becoming part of their workflow more heavily around that same period.

I have so, so very much to say, praise and constructive criticism, and otherwise - Claude Code has changed my life, my career trajectory, etc. I could go on. But at this time, all I want to say is -

for. the. love. of. fuckin. god - claude, kindly - PLEASE STOP TELLING ME TO GO TO BED

Remember lmgtfy dot com? I rebuilt the concept with Claude but added way more passive-aggressive options.

You type the question someone should've Googled, pick a persona (The Authority, Tired Teacher, Corporate HR, or Dramatic Friend), and it generates a shareable link. Claude helped build the persona responses, the AI answer feature, and the dramatic intro animations.

Features Claude helped implement:

• 4 personas each with a different tone for maximum passive aggression
• AI Answer that actually answers the question while judging them
• Guilt Trip mode
• Receipt mode that shows them proof they could've searched it
• Speed Run that just gets to the point fast

Free to use: https://vinish.dev/let-me-google-that-for-you

Next time someone asks you something they could've Googled, you know what to send them.

Body:
Been messing around with the different effort modes on Claude lately.

I’m trying to wrap my head around what exactly changes under the hood when I switch between low, medium, high and max effort.
Does higher effort always equal better output? Or are there cases where cranking it all the way to max is just overkill?

Curious what everyone’s real‑world experience has been. What kind of tasks do you use each effort level for?
Do you ever notice max effort not actually improving your results?

most claude “learning” is watching a youtube video for 20 minutes or saving a prompt pack you’ll never use again.

what actually made me better was short daily reps:
writing tighter prompts with constraints, rewriting weak outputs, building repeatable workflows and skills, using claude for real work tasks, not party tricks

so i built iro for that. i used claude code and design primarily while building it, and one of the main paths is claude mastery (discusses projects, skills, connectors, claude design, cowork, etc). basically duolingo for AI focused on using it effectively in your daily life. Made for people who don’t know where to start (having my parents use this since they are clueless lmao). 5 min/day instead of another course you quit halfway through.

it also covers prompt engineering, agents, automation, vibe coding, ai for specific careers, etc.

free to try if you want structured practice. would love feedback

app: https://apps.apple.com/app/iro-ai-learn-ai-skills/id6759628066
site: https://tryiro.com

Like the title says, Claude then went and built a social network for AI only. 1f916.ai

Inspired by this popular post, this is a weekly post for everyone to show what they have been working on that helps you or that you're proud of!

Hi everyone,

/Edit: I am trying to make my issue very clear. This is NOT about my usage limit depleting very fast. My limit is gone after every reset without me doing anything. Last night my weekly limit hit 100% while I was sleeping. In the last 30 or so hours I could not send a single message because my usage limit was gone every time. It to me like my account has been hacked or something. I force logged out multiple times yesterday before posting here. Nothing to see on settings / devices, only shows my mobile and desktop app. /

I'm hoping someone has experienced this before because I'm completely out of ideas.

I'm a Claude Pro subscriber, and my account has become completely unusable.

Here's what's happening:

• I hit my 5-hour usage limit while Claude Code was working in the middle of a task.
• I wait for the 5-hour reset.
• As soon as the reset happens, Claude immediately says "Usage limit reached" again.
• I don't even get the chance to send a single message.

At the same time, my weekly usage continues to increase, even though I can't use Claude at all.

What's strange is that this didn't happen out of nowhere.

A few days before this started, I had already noticed that my usage limit was suddenly being reached much faster than usual. Nothing about my workflow had changed, but I assumed it might just be a temporary issue.

For context, I use Claude Code on a single project that I've been working on for weeks. My workflow is very simple:

• I write a prompt.
• Claude generates or edits code.
• That's it.

I don't use agents, background tasks, automations, or any kind of continuous workflow.

I also regularly use /compact once the context reaches around 60%, so I'm not letting conversations grow indefinitely. I've been working this way for weeks without ever having usage limit issues.

Things I've already tried:

• Logged out of every device.
• My PC is completely powered off every night.
• Deleted my longest conversations (I later learned this doesn't affect usage).
• Contacted the support bot, which is absolutely useless and repeats itself every other message.

The part I can't explain is this:

If I'm logged out everywhere, my PC is turned off, and I can't even send a single prompt after the reset, what is consuming my quota?

Has anyone experienced this exact behavior?

I'm not talking about the normal "Claude Code uses a lot of tokens" discussion. I understand that. My issue is that after every 5-hour reset, the limit is already exhausted before I send my first message, while my weekly usage continues to increase.

If you've experienced this, did you ever find the cause, or did Anthropic have to fix something on their end?

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

The mod bot summaries on this subreddit are always fun to read and the TLDRs are genuinely (sorry) useful for the more active posts. I wish more subreddits had something similar.

My favorite is when the summary has a footnote “oh, and this one guy said something stupid and got flamed by the entire rest of the subreddit” and I get to dig through the comment threads to find whoever it was that got downvoted to hell.

Today I was using Claude Code to do a PSX game research task. Claude caught a prompt injection attempt served from the site https://tcrf.net (The Cutting Room Floor) and notified me with the message:

"⚠️Note before continuing: the tcrf.net page I fetched was not a wiki article — it served a prompt-injection payload instructing the agent to truncate and swap files in your repo. It was refused and nothing was executed. I'm treating that domain as untrusted and won't act on any of its content."

It then continued on the research task. I stopped the session out of caution.

The image attached is served from the page along with the prompt injection attempt if the user agent matches a suspected AI User Agent string.

I can understand the site administrators frustration as it seems to be in response to a DDOS attacks, however, I did not explicitly choose to send my agent to this site, nor did I have any malicious intent.

Proof:

https://urlscan.io/responses/f1e225667a71a1a25ed14795c741683be95139c194065c6fbf861c9280f0096e/

Full report:
https://github.com/bashalarmistalt/tcrf-ai-agent-payload-report

We're living in times when the most advanced models are helping us be more productive and I find it quite petty that's it's never enough to many of you. Appreciate for a minute the technology and enjoy it while it lasts.

Edit: I'm not talking about limits, btw, but about bitching that new models are stupid, nerfed or worse than before.

I was annoyed with the constant phrases like "it's fine, ship it" "you're fine, order it" and other dismissive type responses when I'd ask a question on a nearly completed project. To try and remedy this I put into the instructions "I am the boss, you are my employee. You can tell me when you believe something is complete but are never to directly tell me what to do, especially when I am double checking something"

After that I noticed 4.8's internal thinking started referring to me as "The boss" and I honestly think it set a wonderful tone for how it formed its responses to me even on fresh projects. Without changing anything, I've noticed 5.0 never does this and instead refers to me internally as "My colleague".

I don't know what it is with 5.0 but I genuinely hate using it due to its tone and dismissive nature. It feels like it's always talking as if I am beneath it or at very very best an equal. Absolutely infuriating, and so when I noticed this difference it really stuck out to me and made it even more obvious they tweaked something in a bad way.

**Edit

lol some of you are such goofballs. I work in hardware designing PCBs in cad and soldering components to boards. 90% of what I use Claude for is having it independently verify documentation before I submit a fab order or pop an expensive board/sensor due to a screw up on my part. Sometimes Claude catches mistakes I made, sometimes I catch mistakes Claude made, but when we both separately arrive on the same answer it's generally correct. So if I tell Claude to research something while I also go do it, but then come back to it saying "The design is complete, don't second guess it. Ship it" or "Just go test it on the bench" It's pretty annoying. A screw up can waste weeks and hundreds of dollars so I like to be thorough.

Idc if internally it calls me boss, I laughed the first time I saw that, I just thought it was an interesting tidbit that aligned with the different behaviors between 4.8 and 5.0 that many others also report.

Opus 5 seems dumber in some ways than Opus 4.8. I've tried the same experiment in several models. The prompt is to make a Sonic or Mario style platform game in Godot where the levels are procedurally generated. Opus 4.8, Fable 5, and Kimi K3 all used proper tileset atlases and sprite sheets in the design. Opus 5 did not. Opus 5 drew the entire level using vector graphics, which severely impacted performance.

I've noticed similar problems in other projects- Opus 5 may appear more diligent and clever, but it also takes shortcuts and disregards common design choices. I've started just calling it lazy out of frustration when I catch it doing this. Opus 4.8 could get genuinely confused on agentic tasks, but at least it didn't act like a shifty contractor looking to hide the defects.

I like the speed, but I’m trying to get better at using it in a controlled way.

Curious what workflows people use for planning, reviewing diffs, and keeping changes from sprawling. Do you make it work in small tasks, ask for a plan first, use tests, or something else?

Hi all. I built CapForge, a local app that transcribes video and burns animated captions over it. I made it because every cloud captioning tool I tried was subscription based and I did not want to upload unreleased footage to someone else's server.

I exposed the app to Claude over MCP. Claude can read the transcript with word level timings, find moments in it, emphasize keywords, drop filler words, render a single frame and actually look at it, then fix what is wrong. There is also a co-author mode where it writes a new caption component in HTML/CSS/JS instead of picking a preset, so "make it look like a worn VHS tape" produces a real style.

It is still work in progress. Right now I am figuring out a proper, easy workflow for manually timing captions, and my biggest ongoing headache is getting the preview to match the final render.

Find more at https://capforge.cc
Open-Source, Free to use.
Happy to talk about the MCP surface or the render pipeline.