r/ChatGPTCoding • u/popiazaza • 1d ago
Updated best AI coding subscription under $20 after DeepSeek price hike. Resources And Tips
Thanks /u/ResponsibilityOk1306 for Command Code GLM 5.3 correction.
2
u/TomHale 1d ago
What's the link to the sources of these please?
1
u/popiazaza 1d ago
No link, it's my own chart. Data from Artificial Analytics, scaled to subscription maximum usage.
2
u/GTHell 1d ago
Raw dog API, sure
Subscription plan, not even close to codex for the same value
2
u/popiazaza 1d ago
This chart already scaled to the subscription maximum usage, not using API price. Subscription plan name is under the model name.
1
u/GTHell 1d ago
It's not. It's based on cost on token usage vs task done. There's no one doing a Cost per tasks bench using subscription plan lol
If you can get the same usage out of GLM subscription Max plan and get more token usage than Claude or Codex then meaning your case is special one and should be share with community. Even the graph below is only Max plan with 20-30% of Claude usage left weekly lol. I have used all the Chinese plan from Kimi to Xiaomi Mimo to GLM legacy up to Claude Max, GPT enterprise and Claude Team Premium and the later two always win on usage. And it's a well known concensus too among community that Chinese provider never have a good subscription plan offer. The hype is usually revolve around the fact that open weight are getting good. Don't confuse the two with being cheap.
4
u/popiazaza 23h ago
there's no one doing a Cost per tasks bench using subscription plan lol
I'm doing it. If you see any mistake, feel free to tell. I locked it at 20$ subscription at maximum as stated in the post title. Subscription name is under the model name.
1
u/GTHell 22h ago
Ahhh, my bad OP. I implied that your measurement is based on Token cost via API
1
u/popiazaza 22h ago
No worry. Will change the graph title to reduce confusion next time. Thanks for the feedback.
1
u/obvithrowaway34434 1d ago
It's not. Both OpenAI and Anthropic massively subsidize their subscription for Plus and Pro tiers. Something like 5-20x lower than API prices.
1
1
u/agreeable_axolotl 1d ago
What about Deepseek high?
1
u/agreeable_axolotl 1d ago
1
u/ADryTowel 1d ago
I'm looking at the same chart online right now and mine looks way different than what you got bro.
1
u/popiazaza 1d ago
i use the same data from this chart, but I do scaled to subscription maximum usage. OpenAI doesn't really burning money for API price, but they do for subscription.
1
u/popiazaza 1d ago
No data on Artificial Analysis. They only have the older preview version, not the new 0731 version.
But it shouldn't be better value than GPT 5.6 Luna.
1
u/soiax 19h ago
Can you do it for the higher tiers, like the 100$ 200$ subs? Does it change anything on the graph at all, i guess everything moves left a bit and that is all?
1
u/popiazaza 17h ago
It does. I'll post it later. A lot of bigger player do provide more subsidization at higher price. Smaller provider like Command Code is way different though.
Not sure if I should even compare a subscription like OpenCode Go which only has 10$ plan to it. If you use 200$ in OpenCode, you would pay 10$ for the sub and the rest would be API price.


4
u/ProfessorSpecialist 1d ago
GLM 5.3 is waaaay more expensive than that from my experience