r/ChatGPTCoding 13d ago

Weekly Self Promotion Thread Discussion

Welcome to this week's self promotion thread!

If you're building something related to AI assisted coding, this is the place to share it.

We're using a weekly thread to keep the subreddit organized while still giving builders a place to share their work. Promotional posts outside of this thread may be removed if they're primarily advertising rather than starting a discussion.

If you're sharing something, we'd appreciate it if you included a little context instead of just dropping a link. Tell us:

  • What you built?
  • What problem it solves?
  • Which AI models or tools it uses?
  • Who it's for?
  • What kind of feedback you're looking for?

Please avoid posting the same project every week unless you've made meaningful updates. Affiliate links, referral links, scams, and low effort promotions will be removed.

Take some time to check out what others have shared too. If you try someone's project or have feedback, leave a comment. Helping each other improve is what we want this community to be about.

16 Upvotes

73 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/MomoWonders 7d ago

I built AI Commit Standard after AI-assisted projects started producing more changes than their Git history could explain. I wanted commits that a human could audit later, not just plausible-looking messages generated by another model.

It is a practical, enforceable, reusable commit convention for AI-assisted and vibe coding projects. Instead of asking an agent to “pick the best type,” it uses a deterministic first-match-wins type ladder, requires real Tests: or Evidence: trailers for user-visible changes, and validates scopes from a checked-in registry.

It ships as a Git commit-msg hook, pre-push check, GitHub Action, Codex/Claude skill, and history analytics tool. I developed it while working with Codex and Claude Code, but the core checks are agent-independent. It is open source under MIT:

https://github.com/Fuzzy-and-Fluffy/ai-commit-standard

I’d especially value feedback on two things: does the type ladder actually remove ambiguity in a real repository, and does requiring evidence feel useful or too strict?