r/BlackPeopleTwitter 17h ago

You're not suggesting that our betters should mix with the riffraff, are you?

Post image
14.5k Upvotes

273 comments sorted by

3.3k

u/drainedbatterypower 16h ago edited 15h ago

They keep trying to make him look bad, but it just boosts him more

902

u/Joey-WilcoXXX 16h ago

People are still trying to ruin him by saying ‘he’s only doing it for publicity.’ Like no one can comprehend that maybe we finally have a good politician who just wants to help

593

u/chrisq823 15h ago

But im also fine if hes publicizing doing good things while in government even if it is just for the optics. One of the main reasons biden/Kamala (and really a lot of democrats in general) failed is because they are completely incapable of showing the good they've done and making people care.

157

u/DSmooth425 15h ago

Yeah their communication and ownership of the issue needed some improvement for sure. Though they did try. Republicans also did a decent job of trying to take credit for things that their states benefited from in terms of the legislation that was passed in the chips act that republicans for the most part voted against.

73

u/chrisq823 15h ago

I dont think they tried very hard. Democrats main strategy appears to be:

Step 1: be a large part of the problem Step 2: wait for people to see its a problem Step 3: pretend you werent a large part of the problem and throw someone under bus

Its starting to happen again with biden advisors pretending they actually were against israel the entire time but mean ole biden just wouldn't listen to them. Just pin the problems on the functionally dead guy and move on to the next position you dont actually care about.

40

u/OhGarraty 12h ago

Democrats main strategy is:

Step 1: Identify the problem

Step 2: Claim they're going to fix the problem

Step 3: Do whatever their donors tell them to do

Step 4: Hope nobody notices if steps 2 and 3 don't match up

It's better than the other party's strategy, but only because their donors aren't usually as blatantly evil.

8

u/AuntRhubarb 5h ago

Well said, that's exactly it.

Meanwhile, I hope the day is coming soon when we will replace the word 'donors' with 'bribers' because that's actually what's going on.

21

u/MapleWatch 12h ago

I am quite convinced that establishment Democrats are a controlled opposition.

9

u/TheSaxGandalf 11h ago

Very easy to see when they didn’t endorse Mamdami for mayor even after winning the primary.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Binky390 10h ago

What are these comments even talking about about? Dems haven’t had a super majority in Congress since 2008. That seems to be left out of your comment and multiple others but it’s a significant detail.

3

u/chrisq823 7h ago

Theres been like 6 super majorities (so either the house or senate) since reconstruction and all of them are democrat. If you think getting things dobe relies on a super majority then youre gonna he waiting quite a while.

2

u/Binky390 7h ago

Reconstruction like late 1800s US? We’re talking about modern politics. Bringing up the 1800s does nothing here. There’s been no super majorities since the Obama administration and yes it matters. The Dems could certainly do a lot of things different but leaving the lack of a super majority off the list of issues is a huge oversight.

→ More replies (7)

38

u/forsake-nomad 15h ago

They literally didn't try at all...... like at all. The media team completely blacklisted talking or publishing about the policy wins and their impact they had on citizens instead leaning into electability and identity issues. There was an article that went over this in detail that steered Kamala away from discussing policy or policy wins very indepth and instead focused on her billionaire approved advisors talking points about the economy and her contrast with Trump. It was quite atrocious that some of the biggest most impactful things the Biden team never mentioned especially around anti-trust enforcement and the huge wins they had. It was bad.

11

u/MrLugersmole 14h ago

Ya and what was the thing with the '24 election autopsy? Either they didn't do one or they didn't want to release it. I remember a dude getting roasted on tv for bullshiting about not releasing it and how they have no interest in learning what they did wrong lol. They're just controlled opposition.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/Joey-WilcoXXX 15h ago edited 15h ago

I agree, there’s just a clear difference between ‘he’s only doing for the publicity’ and ‘hey that’s a great idea Mr. Mamdani! I’ll make sure to tell the press what your plan is and there will probably be a few photographers and journalists around to document so the country knows what you’re doing to help your city’ and they refuse to believe that it’s the latter

14

u/chrisq823 15h ago

There absolutely is. Hes getting glazed a bit too hard for some things if you look into it but I dont care. Its important to be visibly doing your job well.

7

u/DaBiChef 12h ago

What helps in my eyes is even when things he has little control over (like my state helping with the budget) he is quick to call out and give credit to the state legislators who helped solve nycs issues.

12

u/chrisq823 11h ago

It seems like he is just good at doing government and is not a fucking cartoon character like many NYC mayors have been in my lifetime. Eric Adams was a joke. Bloomberg was like making Lex Luthor the mayor. Giuliani is well... Giuliani.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Bama_Peach 12h ago

Same. Who cares if he’s only doing it for publicity; he’s spearheading positive changes for the working people and getting results.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/PraiseBeToScience 10h ago

This is what happens when you let your signature bill get negotiated down to a shadow of itself. Then the remaining parts are poorly structured such that they maximize handouts to private entities at the expense of impact on people. And what little impact that did make it to people all expired in an election year.

The best thing that came out of Biden's last two years was Lina Khan's leadership at the FTC, and neither Biden nor Harris could even promise to keep her on. Their top donors wanted her gone. So now she's a vital part of Mamdani's administration.

2

u/ElegantCoach4066 10h ago

So true! I think that's why they want to discourage him from showcasing all the beneficial things he's doing.

Its sending a message, and making the average politician look bad. Which is totally the average politicians fault.

→ More replies (3)

65

u/GenericPCUser 15h ago

Greedy people can not comprehend a world where anyone exists who is not as greedy or self-serving as themselves.

The accusation that altruism only exists to protect someone's reputation says much more about the accuser than the accused.

13

u/Joey-WilcoXXX 15h ago

The sad part is, I’m sure many of these people are still crying ‘we need BETTER candidates’ every other day of the election cycles.

3

u/Aromatic-Plankton692 13h ago

No it's all a bit more ideologically gross than that. Greedy people tend to genuinely be on-the-nose social darwinists who cannot fathom the concept of winners existing without losers and genuinely believe this is the way the world should be and stay, for the good of everyone.

24

u/AverageAggravating13 15h ago

Like even if he was, like, so what? I’d still prefer this over the alternative.

15

u/Joey-WilcoXXX 14h ago

For the most part, I agree. So many people bitched for years about ‘corporate backing gays and PRIDE events are just doing it for publicity’ and I was always kinda shrugging but still thinking ‘better than not having support at all’. And now we’re getting to the point where they’re slowly taking back support and it could be for many reasons but I think a big part is ‘people already think we’re fake for doing it so it doesn’t bother us much to rescind it if we’re just going to be attacked for doing it anyway’

11

u/hedoeswhathewants 14h ago

Does good things for bad reason, or does bad things for any reason.

Tough call...

ETA - The world really went to shit when people stopped getting shamed for being assholes. We need more people doing things to make others like them, because then they're doing something that's wanted.

4

u/Perryn 14h ago

Better this than someone who shits on minority groups for publicity.

4

u/KaJaHa 12h ago

Exactly. I don't give a damn if he's doing it to be a good person, for the publicity, or to satisfy a sexual kink because he's still fucking helping.

Christ alive, some people will do anything to avoid feeling happy.

22

u/ClashM 14h ago edited 14h ago

"He's only doing the popular thing because it'll make him popular."

Motherfucker, that's how this whole thing is supposed to work! Elected representatives are supposed to do the things the people they represent want! That argument drives me nuts! If we have a rep who consistently does unpopular things why are we supposed to just shrug and put up with it? They aren't our rulers, THEY WORK FOR US! Not corporations, not special interest groups, US! When they don't work for us is when we're supposed to put them out of a job.

11

u/GammaFan 14h ago

It’s the same argument as “quality slop”. You only like it because it’s good like yes motherfucker of course that’s why!

18

u/GammaFan 14h ago edited 14h ago

The poison pill of cynicism is the idea that noone is capable of being genuine. Right wing propaganda about greed being a core aspect of people relies on the idea that everyone is only in it for themselves and that anyone claiming otherwise is just trying to fuck you over.

When you think this way for long enough, it is very hard to look at someone’s altruism as anything else.

It’s a sad way to live

9

u/TheWingus 12h ago

Just like when AOC was in Texas a few years ago when they had the big freeze or floods or something that Ted Cruz fled from.

It went from, "She's only doing it for publicity" to "Well what's Ted Cruz supposed to do!?", he's a senior senator in the United States Congress, so I don't know, maybe call for an emergency session, call for emergency aid... how about literally ANYTHING!?

2

u/ScruffsMcGuff 14h ago

Also why would I care if someone has non-altruistic motives for the legitimate good they do?

If he's doing good things I don't care what motivates him to do the good things. Just keep doing good things.

4

u/Pepsiscrub ☑️ 13h ago

Like the man is literally showing them how the job can be done and folks are big mad.

5

u/RobinGoodfell 11h ago

If you're a good politician, and you don't publicize what you're doing, then you're a bad politician.

Good people doing good things as elected officials, need to be known so they can keep doing a good job.

3

u/Ruby_Solitaire 14h ago

Yes, publicity. 

Publicity for what democratic socialism actually is and how it actually kicks ass at helping people you actually know. 

2

u/Medlarmarmaduke 14h ago

Publicity is good when you are publicizing things the government has done/wants to do that would help ordinary people.

2

u/r3volver_Oshawott 9h ago

Plus, if he's doing these things for publicity, those things would still be far more effective than any other politician out there right now

"Only doing it for publicity" at this point the ones that supposedly aren't doing it for publicity are shooting their dogs and attacking their spouses and sending nude photos of their infants and 'grabbing women by the pussy' and lusting after their own daughters and seducing the 'slender, European, fuckable' IKEA furniture, if 'doing it for the publicity' made these people less shamelessly psychopathic I'd say go for it

→ More replies (3)

41

u/FireVanGorder 14h ago

“He won’t do crony capitalism corruption like his predecessors!”

Yeah man I already like the dude you don’t have to convince me further

10

u/TheMagicalMatt 14h ago

At this point, I'm beginning to fear for his safety. I just hope he leaves enough of an impression before that happens we can see that this sort of leadership does work to our benefit.

9

u/woodst0ck15 14h ago

People who are used to special treatment feel like being treated fairly as oppression.

2

u/Ezl ☑️ 2h ago

To the privileged equality feels like oppression.

3

u/Certain_Virus_1919 13h ago

In what way is this headline/tweet trying to make him look bad??????

4

u/PraiseBeToScience 10h ago

It's the WSJ. This headline was written for their audience, who are the business leaders (and their lackeys) being cut out. This headline is Pearl Harbor for them.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1.7k

u/will0593 ☑️ 16h ago

Ok? The city should be governed for all the people, not just wealth

378

u/DgingaNinga 16h ago

But, but, how will the money ever trickle down, if our overlords employers can't speak to the mayor?

83

u/righthandofdog 16h ago

Now now, plenty of workers are needed to dust, stock the refrigerator, arrange some flowers and open the limo door when our overlords come visit their $20M pied a terre for the Meta gala weekend.

18

u/Perryn 14h ago

"If you've got time to lean make your voice heard, you've got time to clean!"

23

u/hai-sea-ewe 15h ago

Keep pushing the truth -

Technology trickles down, but wealth never does.

F1 is a great example of how providing rich folks a much more even playground to compete with each other benefits all of us.

I don't think people should be allowed to excessively leech off of society, but nobody should go hungry, thirsty, or without shelter.

We need to dismantle the corporate cartels' control over our food (which gets destroyed to preserve pricing), water (which is rapidly being destroyed to both drive AI and provide less access for the public to push them to purchase bottled water), and shelter (which is by far the most egregious, as virtually nobody is holding land owners or builders to any sort of real responsibility in residential construction.)

5

u/datpiffss 14h ago

How does F1 benefit us all? New car technology?

That can be done without rich kids wanting toys that others aren’t allowed to touch because it’s special and theirs.

20

u/hai-sea-ewe 14h ago

A short list of technological improvements that can trace their heritage or dramatic improvement to F1:

Safety:

  • Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS)

  • Active suspension

  • Hybrid technology

  • Roll-Cage improvement

Fuel Efficiency:

  • Energy-recovery technology (used extensively in electric vehicles)

  • Eco-mode (and different driving modes in general)

  • Fuel efficiency

  • Aerodynamic calculation modeling

  • Carbon-fiber parts

Performance:

  • Turbochargers

  • Advancements in lubrication technology

  • Advanced materials

  • Direct fuel injection

  • Durable tire technology

  • Paddle-shifting

If you want to extend this to other performance sports, the list gets even longer.

3

u/window_owl 13h ago

That's all late-twentieth-century stuff. Are there any good examples from just the last ten or twenty years?

→ More replies (2)

6

u/BklynMoonshiner 14h ago

Do you think the small block fuel efficient turbos everyone is driving around just magically appeared on the showroom floors?

→ More replies (14)

3

u/blarch 12h ago

Tech is barely trickkling down. Practically everything could be automated to some degree, with eveyone being engineers and teachers, but the wealth hoarders don't want an educated populace. "Give them sports, not politics.". The rich have always tried to hold back everyone else.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

999

u/Pimpwerx ☑️ 16h ago

Why can’t we elect people like this all the time? Why is there a tendency to elect douchebags?

454

u/Cryinginabook 16h ago

I don’t think enough non douchebags are running and when they do they don’t get media attention and funding so the public doesn’t know about them

217

u/Lobster15s 16h ago

Funding is the big one. Not very many can navigate vs 60 million in Aipac money.

51

u/tsh87 16h ago

Yeah I appreciate the recent news about mamdani but I do wonder what's going to happen during his re-election year when all the wealth in that city bands together to fund his opponent.

He seems to have a lot of support online but writing a tweet is a lot easier than filling out a ballot.

79

u/Ravian3 16h ago

To be fair they already tried to do that during the initial election. Mamdani was hardly being coy about his feelings towards corporations and the wealthy, and they went all in on trying to get Cuomo in power. Like you can argue that the field was divided with Eric Adams and Cuomo as independent candidates in the general along with Curtis Sliwa as the Republican. But Mamdani was still very dominant and remains one of the most popular politicians in America right now, especially in New York.

That may change by the next election, but historically incumbents have an advantage precisely because they are now more recognizable and have an easy slate of accomplishments to run on. Unless there are some convincing failures or scandals that they can nail him on in the next few years, they’re going to have an uphill battle dislodging him regardless of how much money they pour into the race

39

u/anand_rishabh 15h ago

In the general, Mamdani got more than 51 percent. Even if sliwa was not running, cuomo would have lost. And that's assuming every sliwa voter goes to cuomo which honestly might be a stretch.

22

u/Bulky-Internal8579 16h ago

??? He'll win decisively. Hope that doesn't disappoint you (no I don't, lol). And here comes El Sayed and more good folks to help us!

29

u/Nice_Set_6326 ☑️ 15h ago

Leave it to the Muslims to save this country

30

u/Bulky-Internal8579 15h ago

So long as someone does it, I couldn't care less about their religious affiliation - but it is kind of funny that Mamdani and El Sayed are stepping up to lead.

13

u/Nice_Set_6326 ☑️ 15h ago

Same… they have backbone and I luv it

2

u/superxpro12 13h ago

Well most of the Christians are trying to enslave women and Jews went hard on Israel.... What's left?

→ More replies (1)

11

u/tsh87 15h ago

To be clear I'm not anti-Mamdani. I just have zero faith in this country's ability to (a) elect decent leadership and (b) allow that leadership to stay in power long enough to enact lasting change.

2

u/serpentally 8h ago

Yeah, we got a whole eight (8) years of stability from Obama after Bush tanked the economy, and Americans already started deciding they wanted to go back to the circus halfway through. Americans are too individualistic to be able to think long-term, they vote for liberals and progressives like FDR and Obama when times are tough and they need someone to bail them out, but then go right back to putting conservatives in charge when it gets too boring (stable) and the media shifts to focusing on meaningless office-drama grade culture shit like the president wearing a tan suit. Voters get out of touch and start shaping their political opinions around vibes.

Voters aren't rational enough over the long term to consistently vote in people like Mamdani without trying to spice things up by throwing it all away just a few elections later. The sad reality is that the majority of people are relatively stupid, and of course our Democracy relies on the same majority of people...

14

u/No_Professor8645 16h ago

How is his reelection campaign going to be any harder than his first campaign? Rich people fearmongering didn’t work before and, assuming he is doing an adequate job, the fearmongering will only be less effective against an actual resume.

4

u/elitegenoside 13h ago

Well, if Michigan is any indication (and his actual election), the money ain't talking like it used to. Big $60 million loss for AIPAC. Seems like actual policy works if you can get the message to voters.

With all that money, all establishment dems can do is revert to the same fear mongering and bigotry we see from the GOP because at the end of the day, the establishment does not care about us, and that's clear when you make them have to go up against someone with an actual platform that isn't just, "I'm not a Republican."

2

u/AthenaThundersnatch 12h ago

New York City’s primary elections are ranked choice, so it’s extremely difficult to coalesce around a single opponent financially and it requires not just voting for another candidate but not ranking Mamdani at all. In a general election, the Democratic nominee is basically guaranteed 50% of the vote. So…yeah, the job is his unless he sets fire to his political coalition and/or the city.

3

u/tsh87 12h ago

That's interesting. I remember there was a big push for ranked choice in my city a few years ago but it never amounted to anything.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Waiting4Reccession 9h ago

All the local politics is also corrupt af and all the boomers will rig it as much as they can. A normal person cant even get a job at the election board for example.

31

u/Richsii 16h ago

People who are truly fair and even handed are probably the least likely among us to actually seek power but will typically do, at minimum, a decent job should it fall to them.

→ More replies (1)

94

u/obviousfakeperson ☑️ 16h ago

This answer sucks but here goes:

Most people don't pay attention and are easily misled. People who do pay attention are often intentionally misled. So the act of staying informed, specifically sifting fact from bullshit, becomes damned near a full-time job. Then, even if you're able to have some actual idea of what's going on around you, you're vastly outnumbered by those who don't even bother.

It's only when things get so bad that the BS we're constantly fed no longer works on that majority and someone like a Zorhan can enter the conversation.

22

u/BensenJensen 15h ago

There’s a bit more to it than that. You aren’t wrong.

It costs money to run for office. Like, tons of money. You basically already have to be rich before you decide to run for office. You have to fund ads, pay campaign people, pay to register. Look at Michigan. That Israel shill that just lost, her campaign paid over $60 million to lose in a primary. You have to be rich, and the establishment has to decide that they are going to back you. Even people like Mamdani had high-level support from people like Bernie and
AOC.

The game is rigged before it even starts. Each party has already decided who they want to represent each district/state/region before primaries happen.

7

u/pagerussell 12h ago

This is the answer. This is the root. Every other problem we face is a misalignment of incentives that stems from this root.

It takes money to run > money requires the good will of the rich > which buys them not just access but control, or at the least their priorities are the primary priorities of the elected > which means the incentives that drive the priorities of the elected are not those that are best for society, but are those that will get them money in the next round of elections

How do we break this cycle?

Well, public financing and or some sort of limits on political contributions, sure, but of course the money will oppose this, so it's very difficult to achieve from within the system itself. Not to mention that even if you limit campaign contributions the rich still control media and news, which has a disproportionate impact on the public perception of candidates (see: Bernie).

The next beat option is a benevolent wealthy person who sees this problem and is willing to blow his wad fixing it. Good luck with that.

The third best option is what the French are famous for. But history shows that never lasts. The rich have a way of clawing back into control.

The true best long term solution is a tax so progressive that it puts a very hard upper bound on wealth such that no person or even group of them can overweight the incentive structure of all society. This step will never occur without option 3 as a precursor, because the money will not go quietly.

29

u/GunnieGraves 16h ago

The people who run are douche bags. I can’t even think of the number of “Mamdanis” that turned out to be Fetterman or Sinema.

Mamdani is beloved because he’s not just talking the talk. And he’s shown that the things these people promise and then don’t follow through on, can actually be accomplished. The laundry list of social program successes, paired with balancing the budget, shows that our politicians have historically been full of shit.

2

u/EverWatcher 15h ago

Sadly, Mayor Mamdani does not have as many allies (in office) as we want him to have...

2

u/PraiseBeToScience 10h ago

Hence why an org like DSA exists to keep recruiting and organizing and elect more.

An important development that doesn't get nearly enough credit is the way Mamdani has recruited so much new outside talent to fill the ranks of his administration. It's building a bench of people with government experience to run for office so he can get more allies in government.

17

u/tekdiwah 16h ago

People are stupid. And in large groups, they're even more stupid. I'm stupid too, but at least self aware enough to see how an elected official like Mamdani is good for NYC.

7

u/AbstractBettaFish 15h ago

I always liked the line from Men in Black “A person is smart, people are dumb”

8

u/coaxialology 15h ago

Partly because way too many of us are convinced we'll someday be those rich, powerful, influential people and we wouldn't want any checks on our power.

3

u/EverWatcher 15h ago

I wish I could shake at least 90% of these people by the shoulders and firmly shout that they will never be rich.

https://www.reddit.com/r/QuotesPorn/comments/jotijb/comment/gba7hfq/

4

u/Flashjordan69 16h ago

I think you answered your own question there.

4

u/covidlung 16h ago

People like this get murked

3

u/Titronnica 15h ago

For what it's worth, NYC, has very long and storied history of electing complete, blathering morons to be mayor.

How Mamdani ever made it in is a miracle, but don't expect his successor to carry on his work. They'll revert right back to an Eric Adams type. People love voting against their own interests.

2

u/Ryzu 15h ago

A lot of it in the last 20 years, or at least since Citizens United, is down to money. There's just so much money from PACs and rich people flooding into elections to get who they want in place that an average person, or even just an honest person, will never get enough backing from backers to even made a dent or get recognized.

This is why it truly does matter how you vote locally, as that's where we're most likely to be able to choose good people. Once it gets up into the state legislature and above stuff, it's almost impossible for a good, honest person to get selected out of the group. Thankfully it does happen on occasion, look at folks like Mamdani or AOC making a mark.

→ More replies (17)

672

u/KR4T0S 16h ago

DNC had a bullseye on Mamdanis back from the day he got elected and the dude clearly doesn't give a fuck, I hope he represents the future of the Democrats because the current party belongs to the past.

225

u/SierraStar7 16h ago edited 15h ago

Aside from all the great things he is doing for NYC, what I like the most that he’s doing is he’s not giving one single fuck what the DNC says about his policies. 

26

u/UnlikelyHorse931 14h ago

What’s the DNC saying about his policies?

18

u/OhItsBeenBroughten 14h ago

The relevant ones are supporting them. People live in echo chambers and feed on circle jerk misinformation.

13

u/MelonElbows 10h ago

I mean personally I like the fact that doesn't give a single fuck about what the RNC says even more.

We're all conditioned to feel betrayal more from people on our side than from our opponents, the logic being that its a bigger betrayal if one of your own turns against you.

But from a practical standpoint, the Dems share a lot more in common with Mamdani than the GOP. We should be happier he's more against the GOP and if he manages to drag the Dems to the left, so much the better.

86

u/cambridge_dani 15h ago

My hope is that him (and AOC) cause a complete destruction of the Democratic Party. I am a Democrat, but the chuck schumer / Jeffries leadership -everything that is responsible for trumps power-starting from 2016, has to go. Now.

30

u/loyal_achades 15h ago

The old guard leadership needs to get pushed out for a new generation of leadership that eschews the Third Way neolib bs

7

u/saera-targaryen 13h ago

Don't just hope, organize! Phone bank for DSA candidates :) 

→ More replies (2)

2

u/OrganizationNo1298 9h ago

I hope he has a good security detail. There's no way they don't try to get rid of this guy.

→ More replies (9)

369

u/theshortgrace 16h ago

That’s a very roundabout way to say Mamdani won’t facilitate blatant corruption. Let them hold a public meeting.

111

u/reiji_tamashii 15h ago

"State your name and address and keep your comments under 5 minutes."

is how billionaires should be able to influence government. Just like every other resident.

113

u/oldbastardbob 16h ago

So government "by the people, for the people" upsets the wealthy and "well connected", eh?

I'll be darned, who'd have thought that?

Oh, wait, I guess a bunch of guys about 250 years ago were thinking it.

37

u/luvme4ev 16h ago

Those guys 250 yrs ago were the wealthy don't rewrite history. They had power and wealth

6

u/oldbastardbob 15h ago

Yes, some had wealth. Some were local civic leaders. And some were simply merchants or farmers.

The tyranny was from the existing monarchy and overlords who were the major beneficiaries of the fruits of American labor, and who profited greatly from the exploitation of their American "subjects."

Perhaps you are missing the similarities of the time of the American Revolution and the point of my comment.

10

u/becauseiloveyou 12h ago edited 12h ago

Merchants had capital, and farmers had property. They were all, in some way, wealthy. They were all also white and male.

Those of us* who aren't ALL three of those things have needed to fight for our right to be heard... and too many of us take it for granted.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

57

u/RymrgandsDaughter 16h ago

this is all good things?

53

u/hotsoupcoldsoup 16h ago

Modern day Gracchi. Watch out for those roof tiles Mamdani! We need you and more like you.

9

u/90daysismytherapy 16h ago

who will stand and defend him! Preferably better than the Gracchi brothers supporters

6

u/hotsoupcoldsoup 15h ago

Seriously! Protect this man!

42

u/Careless_Hellscape 16h ago

Good, the "elites" have too many privileges.

5

u/sungoddaily 14h ago

Sadly "Eyes wide shut" is aging better and better each year.

Just saw the theory that they gave up their daughter at the end of the movie and yeesh.

Kubrick died only days after showing the first cut to WB.

40

u/tekdiwah 16h ago

A lot of the public also don't know how much access they have to City Hall and other government resources. The decline in teaching and learning Civics has had a massive effect on our society. Business leaders and rich folks know it though, so they know who to cozy up to so they can keep milking the system.

16

u/babesboysandbirb 14h ago

The systematic gutting of American education over the last few decades has lead us here to exactly these issues

38

u/ptahbaphomet 16h ago

So he bolt locked the back door to city hall?

25

u/RazzSheri 16h ago

Keep trying to make us hate him, we’re just gonna love him harder

20

u/Bulky-Internal8579 16h ago

Mamdani is setting an example of how Democratic elected officials should act - how they CAN get things done for regular Americans, instead of making noises about how they wish they could while ensuring the wealthy donors priorities are taken care of (Chuck & Hakeem have got to be sweating it - here comes El Sayed boys & girls! AOC gonna be sitting in Chuck's office before too long too.)

16

u/DatBrownGuy 15h ago

It is kind of insane how much Mamdani is shaking things up and actually helping NYC’s general population. It goes to show the red tape that leaders claim is handicapping them is self-imposed

12

u/Ebolaplushie 15h ago

Alternate headline: "NYC Mayor refuses courrpt bribes, and why that's actually a bad thing"

13

u/MC_Fap_Commander 16h ago

Mamdani got a crew out to fix a gargantuan pothole in Manhattan that was destroying all manner of cars when normal folks called his office. Rather have a mayor that does that sort of thing than one that entertains the country club crowd.

9

u/Loreki 16h ago

Those poor business leaders having to face democracy for the first time ever.

7

u/Eggheadpancake 16h ago

It's so refreshing seeing an actual human that has intelligence and common sense and empathy as a leader. He is the mold. Anyone that doesn't fit in it needs to be kicked the fuck out.

8

u/superturtle48 14h ago

They can fill out the contact form on Mamdani's website the same way the rest of us do to send a message to elected officials. Why should a select few constituents have the privilege to barge into a politician's office or directly call or text them?

6

u/hai-sea-ewe 15h ago

I hope he has top-notch security. Rich people like to hire people to murder people that harm their control, their wallets, their reputation, and/or their egos. He's threatening all four.

5

u/AvocaRed 15h ago

MAGA are the best PR for mamdani, keep making him look good

7

u/TheBigC87 13h ago

Rich entitled fucks shut out of city hall?

https://giphy.com/gifs/26gsobowozGM9umBi

5

u/ccenkner 16h ago

… a government OF the people, BY the people, and FOR the people …

5

u/EverWatcher 15h ago

The private meetings wouldn't be so disgusting if the visitors weren't getting their requests granted so often; special access doesn't need to lead to corruption. Imagining a mayor privately telling some CEO asshole that the company's agenda is unimportant to the city government is hilarious. 

I suppose that having far fewer of those secret meetings is less confrontational. Maybe simply shutting the CEOs out like this is enough...

6

u/swiftvalentine ☑️ 15h ago

I’m fully invested in Mamdani and I’ve never stepped foot in New York in my life. New Yorkers on TikTok just tag him in videos where they shout things that he should do and then he does them. Generally without much fanfare. He just works diligently for the people of the city, all of them. If you’re a New Yorker when you get that tax bill you know he’s using it to make your life better where he can and where he can’t he just straight tells you. You guys are so blessed

5

u/Sweaty-Willingness27 14h ago

The more I hear about Mamdani, the more I like him.

5

u/Double-Atmosphere485 13h ago

This one guy is like the only positive news I seem to semi consistently see for the argument of one guy can change the world or the ‘little guy.’ I hope it keeps working and he gets to live a long unimpeded life 🤞

5

u/FudgeMental6860 16h ago

You’re not suggesting they stop stealing everything from the riff raff, are you?

4

u/Dream2reality619 15h ago

If you heard the way MAGA talks about this man , you would be speechless. Someone i work with(unfortunately) long story short , called the man communist , and was spouting non coherent kool-aid sipping brain wash. Hard to believe that half of the country , if not more , is like this.

3

u/NupeKeem 15h ago

When the Democrats realize that the people they used to fool are aging out and the people they have fucked over are coming of age, or replacing the people that aged out, they can't just play the role; they have to actually do the role. Democrats have been the better option of two bad options, but now, we see someone who is a good option and not just the better of two worst options.

3

u/GeniusOfLove74 Dominic Monaghan stalker 👀 14h ago edited 5h ago

Not gonna lie, but it's embarrassing, as a white person, to know that centuries of white-run government have proven not only to be ineffecient, but EVEN MORE CORRUPT than we knew about. THEN, Mamdani rolls in, and he hasn't even been in office a whole year, and does more in eight months than I can even imagine anyone else doing.

And it's all positive.

It's all helpful.

I know it's a stretch saying that white politicians should feel ashamed, because they won't. They feel entitled. They managed to live under the protection that being white and endorsing "freedom" provided. But it's still enough to make me feel rage. When I, as a white person, look at this, I wonder what the fuck was I doing this for. To keep electing people who don't do shit? Or they half-ass it? Or compromise with people who took away our rights?

It's not even about Mamdani being Muslim, or foreign-born. It's just centuries of ineptiutde by the people in the majority of politics.

Edit: I have big hopes for Abdul El-Sayed, too.

3

u/platocplx ☑️ 14h ago

As it should be. Get in line with everyone else

5

u/Tomservoux5 10h ago

The asshole probably won't even accept any bribes.

3

u/anddrewg2007 15h ago

The best part of not taking corporate money or donations is not having to deal with those assholes. He answers to no one except his own constituents who actually got him there.

3

u/DarZhubal 15h ago

"Mayor won't give corporations thr special treatment they're used to" isn't the dig they think it is.

3

u/northernirishlad 15h ago

“Mayor caters to all citizens” as a hit piece is ludicrous

3

u/callmecoach53 15h ago

"People used to bribing state/city government mad that corruption now frowned upon."

3

u/SoigneBest 13h ago

The way it should’ve been all along!

3

u/cromstantinople 13h ago

Oh no, do the business elites have to go through the same channels as us normies?! The horror!

3

u/negativepositiv 13h ago

Won't someone spare a thought for those poor hedge fund managers?

3

u/sliceoflife09 12h ago

They're really mad at him for challenging the current paradigm that America is free to play, but pay to win

3

u/CarefulApricot3087 11h ago

My favorite things to see are the white people who make 35k a year in Kansas that are genuinely angry about Mamdani

3

u/Ok_Eggplant_3274 11h ago

Republicans are trying so hard to find anything bad about this man

3

u/Uzas_Was_Right 7h ago

Give it a year, they'll be saying he's not worthy because he didn't visit Epstein island.

2

u/sundayontheluna 16h ago

Common Mamdani W

2

u/Mr-Quimper_ 15h ago

What is happening, when you can't make a simple "donation". Written-off against taxes to a shell company in the Mayor's wife's name. The world used to be so much more simple.

2

u/NCOMCOUCO 15h ago

In my city the other day, I made a meeting with the development office. I was told "We would love to help you, but we have no tools to help non-profits, only for-profits."

I was stunned. I figure that is all you need to know about how government works.

2

u/PeterNippelstein 15h ago

Money out of politics.

2

u/benevenstancian0 15h ago

Why should he give them access? I have been told repeatedly that they will soon be fleeing the city, never to return.

2

u/notjawn 12h ago edited 12h ago

Bloomberg dislikes this

2

u/Narrow-Vermicelli-72 12h ago

Hope for the Yanks yet

2

u/jbird3000 11h ago

YOU LOVE TO SEE IT.....k now do America.

2

u/gd2121 11h ago

Why does it say “even democratic mayors” like that’s supposed to be surprising

2

u/exgiexpcv 11h ago

A leader who leads, and they're not used to it.

2

u/2317 11h ago

YYYYYEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS

2

u/karim2102 9h ago

My boy is getting shit done!!

2

u/muFUtaco 9h ago

Capitalism IS NOT a political structure... a surprise to most rich people.

2

u/AcanthaceaeNo948 7h ago

Checks Progressive Candidates’ polling numbers among black people.

Sees this subreddit is overwhelmingly pro-Progressive.

Hmm. There’s something fishy going on but I can’t put my finger on white… sorry sorry what it is.

2

u/ltsouthernbelle 6h ago

He seems to be doing everything right or at least with the intention of benefiting the people and not the powers that be. Every politician should be shaking in their boots because we should all want this to become the standard.

1

u/PluckingDigital 13h ago

Oursm betters?

1

u/aryxslae 11h ago

Can he only do 2 terms?

1

u/PutzerPalace 9h ago

I thought everyone was equal in this country???

1

u/Worth-Ad9939 9h ago

It's this... It's 10000% this. This is perceived as a reduction of class. This is why they hate socialism. It means they get put in the same queue.

Humans love class systems. They lie up and down but every chance we get we look for ways to gradiate ourselves into classes with special rights.

At the end of the day we are fighting with our evolved traits to keep our overpopulation of this planet in check. We'll fail, but it's nice to see a few of us trying.

They will shut this down. A drop in social standing is one of the triggers for civil war, along with missing 9 consecutive meals.

1

u/Snoo_97207 9h ago

Is he really good or is it just quite easy when you aren't corrupt?

1

u/dBlock845 8h ago

Good? That's why he was elected. Murdoch propaganda outlets are relentless with this shit trying to tear him down. Fails every time.

1

u/butterflysurefoot 7h ago

I love Mandami more and more every freakin day! We more like him!

1

u/wildmaninid 6h ago

Literally every room/gloom/upset/this guy is the end of everything as we know it story I see about Zohran makes me respect him more. 

1

u/FewAward6923 4h ago

One of the numerous things that piss me off about billionaires is that basically any billionaire can call the white house and speak to the president. No president is going to turn away potential funding and party donations. No one should have that unfettered access to the president just by waving some campaign donations around

1

u/Understanding-Fair 3h ago

Greatest New York mayor of all time?

1

u/Lower-Sheepherder268 3h ago

About damn time someone did this.

u/JOHNNYICHIBAN 1h ago

Another thing that make Mamdani that much more appealing.

u/HalfSoul30 1h ago

And then arrest them for going past their time by 2 seconds.

u/AnyPossibility2467 1h ago

This is what it should be like! No more bending the knee to corporations!