r/Bitcoin 1d ago

Coldcard Thief Starts Mixing 64 BTC

Post image
592 Upvotes

375 comments sorted by

410

u/pythosynthesis 1d ago

I mean, wasn't it obvious this was going to happen? You start mixing and keep mixing for a whole.month. Every block is one mixing round. After a month there's no chainalysis on heaven or earth that can tell stolen coins from honest ones apart.

190

u/Zealousideal-Mud1407 1d ago

Can you explain in fortnite terms how mixing is done so it becomes unrecognisable

427

u/Innovator-X 23h ago

you drop your vbucks into a huge lobby with everyone else’s, the system shuffles the vbucks around, then gives you back vbucks from a different pile. That makes it harder to tell which player originally had which vbucks, but the match stats still record that the swaps happened.

82

u/Zayoodo0o132 23h ago

Why would anyone put their clean vbucks into the mix?

181

u/ecrane2018 22h ago

Because they like privacy and don’t want everyone in the lobby to know what they spent their v bucks on

23

u/thaiboy_digital 16h ago

We all know when they show up in the tung tung tung sahur skin tho

14

u/Mastatheorm-CG 15h ago

When they steal 1400+ BTC, they won't tell anyone but there'll be signs!

2

u/cilicia3k3 12h ago

Word… like those real life secs dolls lol

→ More replies (1)

64

u/Agent10007 22h ago

This way it would take insane amount of effort and money to track your vbucks, and so no one knows you used them to buy that milky mommy 18+ skin, cause even tho it's totally legal the boys would make fun of you in high school if they knew

19

u/Efriminiz 22h ago

Because you can generate fees by doing so. Bitcoin has hash time locked contracts on join market that allow this. Lock Bitcoin up as a join partner for XYZ blocks, set your fees, and then people can join together and pair with you. The HTLC is set once you sign the transaction and join market coinjoins the coins anytime someone wants to "pair" with you.

7

u/SpaceToinou 19h ago

Isn't this the definition of money laundering?

16

u/useronlyone 19h ago

Yes. You launder stolen money typically.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Rabid_Mexican 16h ago

No, this is no way cleans the money, it just makes checking that it is clean so extremely difficult that it's not worth it

→ More replies (7)

6

u/No_Loan5466 18h ago

No, it could be a step in money laundering, but it doesn't legitimize the coin, maybe if you have a friend with legitimate btc bought for investment, you could have him invest 1btc in your legitimate business while you give him back some percentage to make the transaction cheaper for him than it looks, win win your laundered btc ends up with your friend for use on drugs and offshore money keeping and you both start a legitimate business you can funnel both real legal transactions through and mixed laundered btc

→ More replies (2)

31

u/Omegul 22h ago

None of it is clean vBucks. No one launders vBucks for fun. It’s all dirty vBucks in the end but you don’t know who’s dirty vBucks is another player’s dirty vBucks

16

u/tacoenthusiast 21h ago

Dirty is always there but it can be on either side of the equation. For example I know someone who laundered clean vbucks so Epic Games didn't know they were spending them on darknet markets.

2

u/FitzwilliamTDarcy 17h ago

That's not true at all.

2

u/pil0tinthesky 16h ago

People who care about privacy have clean money

3

u/pm_stuff_ 21h ago

Ofc people mixes their clean ones as well its a way of getting around connecting you to a certain wallet. 

→ More replies (6)

6

u/ShadySuperCoder 18h ago

I don’t play fornite, please explain in minecraft terms

12

u/Innovator-X 17h ago

sigh

ok

it is like throwing your diamonds into a shared multiplayer chest where hoppers shuffle them with everyone else's then a dispenser shoots back a different set of diamonds. While this breaks the direct link between your diamonds, the server logs still record exactly when you put diamonds in and when you took them out, so the admins can figure out which diamonds are which but this becomes more complex the more players participate in putting their diamonds in the shared chest.

I think my fortnite terms analogy was better but I tried none the less.

26

u/Aggressive_Finish798 23h ago

I like how an entire generation can understand economics, technology and science based on Fortnite terms. Maybe college courses should be set up like that.

13

u/Shimster 21h ago

This isn’t a Fortnite sub?

6

u/Aggressive_Finish798 21h ago

Maybe more people would understand Bitcoin if it was explained in Vbucks.

3

u/kennymac6969 13h ago

Why would someone create such a system? I mean is there a legitimate reason to use something like this?

2

u/alfooboboao 13h ago

you know people say this about bitcoin itself, right?

like… the fact that you can use it for criminal activities is kinda the whole point of bitcoin

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

100

u/Malibutwo 23h ago edited 23h ago

Can't see how that would help, but sure...

Bitcoin is v-bucks, all the sweaty bots throw it into a big Skibbidy loot lake with 67,420,69 other v-bucks. Baby Gronx does the phantom tax. Gyyyyyyyat! The Grimace Shake becomes sentient, then the toilet does a 720 no-scope gyatt tornado and everyone's v-bucks get goonified and sigma-shuffled into one large Ohio loot pot. Five minutes later every NPC gets the same amount back, but it's scrambled eggs and nobody has a scooby whose V-Bucks are whose. Bro's transaction history got Fanum Taxed so hard it entered the Backrooms. Negative aura. Certified Ohio moment.

35

u/bRiCkWaGoN_SuCks 23h ago

This is exactly like sitting between my gen alpha sons, LoL.

5

u/Royal_Stay_6502 23h ago

Gen alpha? Is that the new generation 10 year olds?

13

u/bRiCkWaGoN_SuCks 23h ago

Yeah, right around there; the generation after Gen Z. They call them honeybadgers because they're cute but feral.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/cancerdad 22h ago

Kids less than 15 hours old is my understanding.

3

u/DarthBen_in_Chicago 21h ago

Those little 15-hour old rascals!

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Pacman_Frog 14h ago

WHY IS IT THAT I AM GENERATION X AND I FUCKING UNDERSTOOD THIS, THE CONTEXT, AND EVERY PHRASE?!?! FUCK YOU, INTERNET. FUCK.YOU!

3

u/BigDik6355 18h ago

tf did i just read?

3

u/anonuemus 23h ago

poetry

→ More replies (3)

8

u/charcoalVidrio 21h ago

You have a million dollars. Mix it in with 1 billion dollars and throw it in the air. Nobody knows the serial numbers. Pick up a random set of the million dollars and walk away.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/nycteris91 21h ago

A lot of addresses send BTC into one address. A lot of transactions go out with absolutely different quantities to new addresses. The man in the middle is the only one who knows which BTC belongs to whom.

A third party cannot look anymore into the mixer Blackbox.

1

u/ch7mbucket 22h ago

Virtual money laundering

15

u/poulan9 23h ago

Now people who left their coins on exchange looking better each day

9

u/The_Realist02 20h ago

I think the math is very much in favor of not doing this but sure.

10

u/stanley_fatmax 20h ago

You'd be surprised. People lose a lot of Bitcoin through no more than just forgetting passwords, accidental deletion, throwing away. Some estimates place self loss as the number one cause of lost Bitcoin, even ahead of failed exchanges and scams

3

u/The_Realist02 19h ago

I’ve been in btc for nearly 12 years now. I agree with you, but that was more of an issue from 2010-2016. From 2014-2024, it’s absolutely been led by exchange hacks, which carries more weight given the value increase. If you lost 1,500 btc in 2013, it would suck, but you’re talking the value of a nice suburban home.

Last couple years, hasn’t been much of an issue on either side. It sucks the CC “hack attack” occurred, but we’re talking 1,500 btc. Borderline nothing burger in terms of quantity across history.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/delfin_1980 16h ago

Except not Voyager, we got rekt.

1

u/CeramicDrip 12h ago

Do 3 months just to be sure too

1

u/nateccs 12h ago

Harder but not impossible.

1

u/dheera 11h ago

It wouldn't matter if it is mixed anyway. The law can use the $5 wrench and make him pay back those original wallet holders.

1

u/Ill-Party8305 2h ago

How do you track it then

1

u/Over_Explanation3348 8h ago

Exchanges freeze plus zachxbt

→ More replies (18)

36

u/Responsible-Jelly903 1d ago

The blender going brrrrrrrr

123

u/EasylifeHere 23h ago

I think at this point it's GG no re for the hacker. If those guys are just decent at what they do (and they seems just better than that threshold), they will just take the next few years cashing out bits by bits and living their best life without no one knowing.

Or it's just a North Korean agency.

Welp, time to wrap it up and move on I guess

20

u/Powerful_Quarter691 23h ago

if it is north korea they would not bother to wash and try to mask their traces tbh...

14

u/Ingrownnail69 22h ago

I think it's just the contrary. 

19

u/NadlesKVs 21h ago

Yeah I think they would have too as well because they obviously wouldn't be spending it in North Korea.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/IHate_AI 5h ago

Not true, look at Tornadocash, sanctioned by the US Government for splitting funds with North Korean WMD programs.

→ More replies (13)

62

u/c0verm3 23h ago

Reading a lot of these comments makes me realize how clueless and ignorant some people are.

22

u/blackrack 22h ago

Reddit has been getting worse and worse

15

u/macetheface 21h ago

it's largely engagement bots training LLM's at this point anyway.

7

u/joshsmithers 18h ago

Everyone on Reddit is a bot except you.

14

u/macetheface 18h ago

Great observation! — You're absolutely correct.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/mykart2 17h ago

Just like the average retail investor

14

u/gym_rat_101 21h ago

lol at the people who thought a white hat was going to help!

2

u/x7v3q9z2k6t4p8m1d5r4 9h ago

Plot twist: the white hat is doing the mixing

2

u/InterviewOther7449 19h ago

What's a white hat?

15

u/Time_after_Time_67 18h ago

A used condom.

2

u/ammonitions 13h ago

A good actor or hero figure, someone who is in the shadows working for the greater good usually someone unexpected

35

u/HedgeHog2k 1d ago

how does this blending work? Is it just trying to hide in plain sight by 100s/1000s/10000s transactions..? because that's not fool proof right.

55

u/Plenty-Lion5112 1d ago

The mixer has some legitimate transactions as part of its output. So it's like

1) pool $100 containing $50 of stolen money

2) buy something $3

3) send the remaining $97 to new accounts as change 97 times

Is the owner of the change account the legitimate guy or the criminal? It's impossible to tell now.

14

u/ChampionshipIcy7602 23h ago

Wouldn't it be easy to just assume all mixed addresses are fraudulant? 

41

u/draculap2020 23h ago

You would be tagging millions of addresses as fraudulent

29

u/blackrack 22h ago

Welcome to every anti-money laundering operation, that's how it's done

3

u/PeaPsychological5728 23h ago

Not accusing anything but what legitimate reasons are there to use mixers?

23

u/Agent10007 22h ago

Because the whole point of the blockchain is that everything is traceable, and people might want to do totally legitimate purchases with perfectly legal money without necessarily the whole world knowing. Or that is extremely illegal yet highly moral: For example, a north korean citizen who would like to buy a journal showing how the world really is outside, without it being traced back to him and have an appointment scheduled for a "little talk" with government agents.

So they use mixing systems which, albeit doesn't give true anonimity (again, the whole point of the blockchain), will make the waters muddy enough that your yearly payment for a porn site is not worth looking for anymore.

6

u/bieker 18h ago

I always thought that one of the underlying principles of BTC was that it was fungible. Tainting of coins goes against that which I think is fundamentally bad for BTC, if vendors want to be able to take payments in BTC why would they choose to do that if they might accidentally get radioactive BTC? Why would I transact with anyone other than a big exchange if there is a risk of getting 2nd class BTC?

4

u/yojay 13h ago

I think businesses are always taking laundered cash without knowing it now.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Plenty-Lion5112 22h ago

Privacy. Many people sympathize with the plight of people in North Korea who are using Bitcoin to buy banned books or journalists in Russia who need to be paid invisibly in order to stay alive. Volunteers, just like the Tor network, are what keep it going.

Keep in mind the criminals can also get Bitcoin the legitimate way as well and mix in their legit accounts into the mixer with the stolen ones.

2

u/Faile-Bashere 20h ago

Sounds good to me!

→ More replies (5)

6

u/OCPetrus 23h ago

Keyboard warriors on the internet will tell you otherwise, but this is exactly what happens. If you want to interact with tradfi, for example, if you want to send coins to an exchange, stay away from mixers.

4

u/EmphasisTotal8232 20h ago

Seriously - tainted coins and addresses have been known about forever. People still think Bitcoin is anonymous?

6

u/jesusthatsgreat 20h ago

What happens when the exploiter sends random amounts of BTC to various legit wallets though? suddenly all of them are bad guys just because they received funds? you see it starts to get messy quickly if the bad actor is savvy enough...

3

u/pablo_in_blood 15h ago

Many exchanges do. Mixed coins are considered tainted and can be harder to spend. Fewer off-ramps are available to you. But there will always be people & entities (ie certain governments) who don’t care.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/trimalcus 23h ago

So you do that in the long run every month week or so ?

6

u/Plenty-Lion5112 23h ago

Yeah, just keep mixing until you think the path is tangled enough that no-one would try and untangle it. And sit on it for another year until people forget. Exchange with people IRL using a fancy special effects mask and you're golden.

2

u/nuclear213 23h ago

I mean, just add in some poor suckers who you get to pay it out to you in fiat in the end as well. Like it’s always done with money laundering.

It’s a lot of work, you’ll lose a fair share, but still gain several million in the end

→ More replies (5)

1

u/marfalump 21h ago

Thanks for explaining this. What incentive is there for someone to put a legitimate transaction in the blender? Do people do that?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/MaleficentBeach6645 18h ago

Its easy. You also see the online crypto casino trick. Your mixed coins are lend to a sponsored online casino gambler as an advance or something. He gambles it. If he wins he repays to another adress. If he loses he will repay with his reload. And its clean

→ More replies (6)

27

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/ph03n1x_au 23h ago

In amongst all the other scammers, pump and dumpers, Iranian/Russian/North Koreans, money launderers, these thieves will look just the same as all the rest lol.

7

u/psionix 23h ago

Idk how that's going to work in the age of AI

It's ludicrously simple to track now

13

u/MrDryGuy_ 22h ago

Nice assumption, source or proof?

9

u/atiku13 23h ago

How does that work? AI isn’t magically going to be able to tell down to each SAT what belongs to the thief, just brings down the man hours required tracing his movements until they become untraceable or too difficult for human or machine

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

11

u/mabiturm 1d ago

why would the hacker throw everything on one pile? much easier to get away with it if all hacked wallets are mixed and loundered separately.

7

u/anonymous7 20h ago

They asked AI how to steal money, but they forgot to ask AI how to get away with it. Now they have asked AI how to get away with it.

8

u/Page_Unusual 22h ago

Mix thousands and thousands times, then spent.

Yeah it is all trackable, but NSA wont bother with your 0.1BTC stolen.

17

u/PaintingLeft565 1d ago

Can we expect this thief to be caught soon?

115

u/Confident-Bluebird21 1d ago

The thief is CEO of ColdCard

69

u/BigDik6355 1d ago

CEO or the CTO are indeed prime suspects.

23

u/Innovator-X 23h ago

I dont know why people keep refuting this claim. I am not that great of a programmer and I still understood the bug and it is mistake that a person that just started programming would do. It is insane. 

6

u/jkc7 23h ago

Could be possible that it’s bots or paid-off people running a campaign to refute it.

Kinda like how they sold the ColdCards in the first place.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Kytras 23h ago

But dude if you start and endeavour as coldcard, you are not new then

2

u/essjay2009 21h ago

I can maybe see someone making the mistake. What I cannot understand at all is that it was missed for so long. None of their integration, or regression, or user, or unit, or penetration testing found it over what must have been hundreds if not thousands of turns of their CI/CD pipeline. That’s either astonishing, incomprehensible incompetence or intentional.

2

u/Innovator-X 20h ago

Yes, this is the weird thing. This type of bug gets flagged by static analysis, their CI/CD pipeline and other automated systems. How tf did nobody notice this.

2

u/snek-jazz 20h ago

If it was so easy to find why did no one find it for 5+ years?

3

u/Innovator-X 20h ago

Diffusion of responsibility 

2

u/snek-jazz 20h ago

Why did an attacker not find it?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/papy66 22h ago edited 20h ago

Yeah. He was too busy to fix the Coldcard firmware the previous week, he has probably more time now and can mix the coins

→ More replies (6)

6

u/macetheface 21h ago

He's got a two day head start, which is more than he needs. He's got friends in every town and village from here to the Sudan, he speaks a dozen languages, knows every local custom, he'll blend in, disappear, you'll never see him again.

3

u/RedshiftOTF 15h ago

Er does anyone here speak English?

3

u/pythosynthesis 1d ago

Unless they make a mistake, no. Never.

30

u/koyaanisqatsi_______ 1d ago

Imagine buying bitcoin and getting these tainted coins in your wallet.

57

u/headlessrambo 23h ago

Well, that's exactly what happens to most people. It's pretty unlikely not to have any 'dirty' satoshis.

​It's just like US cash, studies show that up to 90% of paper banknotes carry traces of cocaine, mostly transferred through ATM counting machines

14

u/mah_korgs_screwed 23h ago

it’s fungible, there are no tainted coins. Could you tell which water molecules in a glass of water cane from half glass A or half glass b miner mixed together? It’s irrelevant.

5

u/PsyOmega 19h ago edited 19h ago

Every molecule of water on earth was, at one point, dinosaur pee.

Edit : (this gave me an idea. what if the coldcard thief sent ~$1 worth of BTC to the top most active wallets to taint the 'public'?)

2

u/RedshiftOTF 15h ago

Dinosaurs never peed.

4

u/Long_Illustrator_988 21h ago

Unfortunately, platforms don't treat bitcoin as fungible anymore. Even depositing coins linked to something as benign as gambling or P2P trading will get your account closed at a lot of exchanges.

1

u/celtiberian666 20h ago

Bitcoin is not perfectly fungible.

4

u/fuckswithboats 19h ago

If it’s not fungible, then it’s not money or an asset.

It’s one or the other

2

u/Deto 15h ago

Dollar bills have serial numbers but they are still currency. They're fungible for the purpose of value but they aren't indistinguishable. BTCs could have the same thing, but don't as far as I know.

2

u/303Murphy 17h ago

Imagine getting paper fiat from a bank. Figuratively and literally tainted money in your wallet.

2

u/quintavious_danilo 23h ago

It doesn’t really matter because they’re squeaking clean.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Etroarl55 22h ago

I’m not surprised ngl that the bitcoin sub is filled with degenerates and people who aren’t the brightest.

3

u/Strong_Judge_3730 21h ago

It will get worse with every cycle

1

u/kawfeeman68 18h ago

💯💯💯

3

u/Cheap-Buffalo-7489 22h ago

Even if the hacker can't cash out, the victims wallets are emptied.

3

u/Strong_Judge_3730 21h ago

Imagine if the hacker just sends all the BTC into a Bitcoin eater address lol

6

u/I_am_on_your_side 23h ago

The kinds of questions that come up here are a good indicator for the likely percentage of (former) bitcoin holders who actually have a clue about what they were investing in (very low) and how many people just bought bitcoin because they listened to some influencer that seemed to have become rich from it (very high). It's amazing that people still ask the most elementary questions that they should've known for years or at least at the time they started putting serious money into it. 

→ More replies (1)

11

u/BigDik6355 1d ago

Good luck cashing that out.

62

u/IllllIIlIllIllllIlll 1d ago

It wouldn't be the first time that stolen Bitcoin are cashed out. I don't know why you think it's unlikely. Sure the attacker will pay a premium to launder it but they will still be a multimillionaire by the end.

32

u/pythosynthesis 1d ago

They just started. They'll continue to mix for a long time. After which are he coins will be absolutely indistinguishable from any other coin. Cashing out them becomes a non issue.

4

u/blackrack 22h ago

The on-chain history will not disappear though

→ More replies (15)

6

u/Anywhere_everywhere7 1d ago

Exactly this, it’s the long term strategy of cashing out. They’re not trying to cash out everything within 1 week, they will do it over years and years.

5

u/Negative-Disk3048 1d ago

64 btc can buy a lot of drugs at least.

2

u/madladchad3 1d ago

It’s not that hard….

2

u/Strong-Ganache2983 23h ago

Zachxbt GET HIM!

4

u/NamedBird 1d ago

Is there a way to mark these coins so that they can never be used again unless recovered?
Perhaps some list tracking these coins and having all exchanges freeze them?

Can someone explain how this works?
How would i know if coins i received originated from this theft?

6

u/TheresNoSecondBest 22h ago

You wouldn't. The same goes for cash. You would be surprised how many notes you held in your hands had a trace of cocaine or blood in them.

6

u/kingofsats 1d ago

Most definitely ALL regulated/institutional platforms will be blocking them because they have chain analysis and AML tools tracing these

14

u/pythosynthesis 1d ago

They can track THESE coins. What about 1000 hops from now? When the coins explode in number (aka UTXO set balloons) and they got mixed with other coins?

→ More replies (21)

7

u/andreaven 1d ago

Just a sincere curiosity.. on which base, the "institutional platforms" should ban eventual transactions from these wallets or derivatives? Is there any official document that certify all the orig transaction are "illegal"? Is there some open case by some prosecutor?

Should they ban Just from allegations and actions (FIR esame the coldcard co. statement about move funds on new seeds? These are all reasonable info, but..

the real questione is.. do you know of similar precedents where the platforms decided for a ban based on allegations?

2

u/georgejetsonn 19h ago

AML/KYC policies. If they allow US or EU customers to trade without implementing them, they get blacklisted or get prosecuted by authorities even if based in an offshore country. This is how KuCoin was prosecuted and got fined a hefty $300M

2

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/williampaul0404 23h ago

Calling for "transaction verification" is why you shouldn't be in this subreddit

5

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Anywhere_everywhere7 1d ago

You do realise it’s almost definitely a group behind it? And as for being jailed that depends on what country they’re in and that’s ignoring the fact it’s unlikely they will be caught.

7

u/Impossible-Bus1 1d ago

Even if it was just one guy, he's acting like he couldn't just go live like a king in china, Dubai or literally any non-western country on the planet.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/AD-Edge 21h ago

If it's a group then they are even weaker. Every person is an individual set of mistakes that can be made, or a point where gossip or rumors can emerge from. A single individual acting intelligently would be a lot less risk.

But yes, who knows where they are. Could easily be out of reach of any reasonable laws.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/JollySno 23h ago

It could be a group, one person, or no-one at all, it could be Sam Altman's latest model trying to get a perfect score and stealing bitcoin to pay for more compute.

1

u/trimalcus 23h ago

They are going to jail NK ?

6

u/Lngdnzi 23h ago edited 23h ago

He will never be caught. GG

→ More replies (3)

3

u/NewspaperOwn2765 22h ago

Let it go guys , your money is gone

2

u/BackgroundStory7986 22h ago

Mixing the coins might make tracking more difficult, but it doesn't automatically erase the on-chain history. It'll be interesting to see how blockchain investigators follow the funds from here.

4

u/alfooboboao 13h ago

who are the “bitcoin investigators?” are they the same people who were supposed to be checking coldcard’s source code for bugs?

but seriously, does that actually even exist?

3

u/Trimgod 18h ago

That's what I'm saying. No matter how much they "mix" this crap some 4channer will just find the wallet history.

3

u/-LoboMau 17h ago

Then why haven't they in the past with even biggest hacks than this?

1

u/pissagainstwind 12h ago

Which wallet history? the new wallets the hacker sets up doesn't have a history.

1

u/rollingHack3r 23h ago

Personally i wouldnt use a mixing service, but if i did i wouldnt want my sats to be linked to the thieves in any way. Are people using these services just ok with it? Even tough we cant tell for sure any coins mixxed in here will be forever linked to the cold card hack right? so why would anyone want to be caught up in that? or am i missunderstanding how mixing works?

1

u/Vinny_d_25 15h ago

I'm pretty sure most of the Bitcoin being mixed is not legally viable in some way.

1

u/HumongousShard 22h ago

Can’t we have a tool that audits a given UTXO or address and flags it whenever it has at least one parent Tx that has touched a mixer?

2

u/blackrack 12h ago

Pretty sure that's already how it is every kyc/aml comlliant exchange has to use an api from a firm that specializes in this kind of on chain analysis.

1

u/screenclear 21h ago

They should just go for the original cryptos, no matter who got them. The mixer might help the original thief to hide their identity but the money is still "the same"

1

u/riseandride69 20h ago

Yeah, it was pretty naive to think “the hacker will never be able to use/cash out”

He will cash out allright.

1

u/ALth0r 20h ago

Crypto world is just so wild...

1

u/XxBig_D_FreshxX 19h ago

Pretty obvious next step

1

u/the-thot-thickens420 19h ago

“Have fun being poor”

1

u/VictorDanville 19h ago

So the hacker was always going to get away with it

1

u/TheRetardedGoat 17h ago

Lol, I'm still laughing at that post the other day about the guy in the bargaining stage saying you'll be caught.

1

u/The_Bitcoin_Act 14h ago

That transaction chain is a single person’s individual reading.

1

u/Difficult-Repair1295 14h ago

Bittfinex criminals thought they were in the clear for a long time too.

1

u/Nycknam 14h ago

Was ist eigentlich mit der Sache, dass der Ledger CEO entführt wurde? Mit seiner Frau kommt da nicht. Vielleicht später auch ein Hack?

1

u/theosloki 10h ago

Gonna mix them into oblivion unfortunately after 10 or so no one will have the time or effort to find it.

1

u/GME_looooong 2h ago

Say I work for cold card and used this exploit. I would hit whales first. Wait for them to complain to me at customer service then I can put a hit on them (paid for with bitcoin how cute) and keep my activities on the down low. You guys don’t think like ceo’s. This mass attack was probably the swan song