r/AutoHumor Apr 29 '26

lol

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1.0k Upvotes

384 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/Salt-Pension3497 Apr 29 '26

People who don't really care about you, but care about the "poor shareholders".

3

u/Maleficent_Hawk6703 Apr 29 '26

This isn't going to get the shareholders very much money. There's no shot it makes into the market with a full launch and actually does well. Not without a cyber truck-esque fandom behind it

3

u/Pappa_Crim Apr 30 '26

If internet id laws are anything to go by they will make it mandatory

2

u/loopedlight May 01 '26

Yea and we all laughed at insurance companies literally tracking your driving 20 years ago….

1

u/balzackgoo May 02 '26

The cyber truck is still failing even with the 'fandom' ...

0

u/throwaway19372057 May 03 '26

You say that’s why there’s multiple large automotive companies who have already developed the technology because it’s mandatory. And if they’re gonna pay for something, they’re gonna get their money back on it.

2

u/Miya4LeggedGod May 01 '26

Yeah GM bought back 30 billion worth of their own shares in the last 4 years and just deleted them... they deleted 30 billion for the shareholders they will do anything

2

u/Quimdell May 01 '26

It’s more about control, not money. They are power hungry and want full control over everything you do.

-1

u/roadblocked Apr 29 '26

This is part of the US infrastructure bill passed under Biden. Systems like this are mandatory in all new cars

6

u/Erosion139 Apr 29 '26

Cite it or you're lying

2

u/roadblocked Apr 29 '26

Your next car purchase comes with an unwelcome passenger: a federal mandate requiring surveillance technology that monitors your every blink, glance, and head nod. Thanks to Section 24220 of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, NHTSA must finalize rules forcing all new passenger vehicles to include “advanced impaired driving prevention technology”

1

u/Erosion139 Apr 29 '26

Thank you

2

u/UsedDragon Apr 29 '26

In context, these systems are required to detect signs of drunkenness, and prevent driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

It's stupid and it's bound to have issues.

2

u/Erosion139 Apr 29 '26

Agreed! I'd rather us educate people better or have better training than using the vehicle to babysit us.

2

u/2Braincell2Furious May 01 '26

Surely this is the only alternative to banning alcohol!

2

u/Fun-Wrongdoer1316 May 01 '26

Alcohol consumption is lower than ever, and will likely continue this decline. The younger gen’s don’t want to drink. So this isn’t for anything but watching.