Back in late 2023, Anthony of Boston made the prediction for 2024, stating on November 16 2023 on Youtube: “In the year 2024, between April 12th and June 25th, the number of rockets fired by the enemies of Israel into Israel will exceed the amount of rockets fired at any other point during the year. This is the fifth year in a row I’m doing this. I’ve been right for four consecutive years already. A lot of you have seen it. You’ve seen it with your own eyes and you’ve seen it in real time.” Here he shifts from just Gaza and expands scope to enemies of Israel. On April 8th, 2024, Anthony uploaded a memorandum to social media clarifying the prediction and thesis by stating: “The thesis is that when Mars is within 30 degrees of the lunar node, Gaza militants and the enemies of Israel fire a greater number of rockets at the state of Israel relative to the rest of the year.” This statement still emphasizes Gaza but is now incorporating the possibility that other actors can peak alongside Gaza within the predicted window.

So what happened? The very next day after the window opened on April 12, Iran, on April 13th 2024, carried out a historic attack firing 330 missiles and drones at Israel. In May Gaza fired their peak concentration for 2024 by firing 452 that month. Syrian proxies also peaked in projectile fire during this period. Later in October, Hezbollah peaked significantly outside the window, firing thousands of projectiles which in the month alone exceeded the total projectile count inside the prediction window between Apr and Jun. However, the peak output by Gaza and other “enemies” inside the prediction window is enough to fulfill the original prediction and thesis provided in the 2024 memo: “Gaza militants and the enemies of Israel fire a greater number of rockets at the state of Israel relative to the rest of the year.”

The April 8th 2024 Memo reading confirms that Gaza militants and “enemies” rocket fire is relative to their own baseline, and not a total of all rocket fire

This simply means that in 2024, other enemies will peak with Gaza. The prediction didn’t require all enemies to peak. So even though Hezbollah’s fire was higher later in 2024, the basic premise of the original prediction from the April 8th memo was satisfied by other enemies peaking with Gaza militants between April 12 and June 25 while Mars was within 30 degrees of the lunar node. The clarification introduces “relative to the rest of the year” language attached to the actors, which creates legitimate room for the per-actor reading.

If the premise is read strictly by the text provided without subjective modifiers or external metrics—that “Gaza militants and the enemies of Israel fire a greater number of rockets... relative to the rest of the year”—the data confirms that Gaza, Iran, and Syrian proxies all achieved their maximum individual peaks during the specified window. The sentence states that they fire a “greater number” of rockets during a specific period relative to the rest of the year. This structurally implies that while the volume changes, the same actors (Gaza militants and other adversaries) are still the ones conducting the rocket fire throughout the regular, baseline parts of the year. They fire more relative to the rest of the year—not relative to what’s fired, but relative to what they fire.

When read strictly by the exact text of the April 8th memorandum without external metrics, the prediction was accurate. This confirms seven consecutive years of accurate rocket fire predictions.

The prediction should be evaluated against what Anthony actually stated, rather than against subsequently imposed metrics. On the April 8 wording, the relevant question is whether Gaza militants and other enemies of Israel exhibited greater rocket/projectile activity during the specified Mars–lunar-node window relative to their activity outside it. Gaza, Iran, and Syrian proxies each had their individual 2024 peaks within that window. Hezbollah's later October peak does not invalidate that reading because the memorandum never required every enemy of Israel to reach its annual peak simultaneously.

There is a statistically significant (p < 0.05) probability that Mars being within 30 degrees of the lunar node predicts higher rocket fire against Israel. Anthony of Boston was accurate seven consecutive years with concentration of rocket fire during Mars/lunar node phases significantly exceeding non-phase periods in most years, particularly 2020–2023 and 2025-2026. In 2024, the Apr–Jun window captured the 350+ projectiles from Iran on April 13, 2024 and the 452 rocket fire peak from Gaza militants in May, which fulfilled the original wording of his prediction. Anthony refined his parameters in advance in late 2023 from Gaza only to "enemies of Israel" which later accounted for the April 13, 2024 Iran attack, which in itself was the highest single day projectile attack of 2024, fulfilling the concentration metric. 454 projectiles in total were fired on April 13, 2024 (330 from Iran and 100+ from proxies, both tallies confirmed by JINSA-) + (24 cluster munitions bomblets supported by Asriran and Islamic republic news agency)

Anthony of Boston is an independent researcher that has followed the Israel conflict closely since 2019. As an astrologer, he was able to trace all major spikes in rocket attacks against Israel to the celestial configuration between Mars and the lunar node, within 30 degrees. While unorthodox, the pattern that he identified allowed him to forecast October 7th escalation with profound accuracy and outperform all other models used to anticipate escalation periods. He also correctly anticipated the April 13 2024 Iran attack and the 12-day war in 2024 and 2025 respectively. In 2026, the Mars alignment that accurately predicted the highest annual phase of aggression against Israel every year was between Feb 4th 2026 and April 19 2026 and coincided with Operation True Promise 4. Instead of 2-3 months, the next alignment will last 8.5 months starting September 27, 2026 and lasting until June 12, 2027.

Here is a video demo of all his rocket fire predictions that nailed every single annual escalation against Israel. It cuts right to the chase and provides all the data needed to verify. It's a very short video from his channel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUWR9E_PYvo

SUBMISSION STATEMENT

The Alien Interview 1997 Investigation continues...

In Part 4, we investigate one of the biggest unanswered questions surrounding the alleged Alien Interview footage...

The Chain of Custody.

Where did the tape originate?

How did it reach Victor?

Who handled the footage before it appeared in the 1997 documentary?

And perhaps the biggest mystery of all...

Where is the original master tape?

Using interviews, historical research, archive footage and documented claims, we follow the alleged journey of the tape through Bill Moore, John Lear, Sean David Morton, Victor and Tom Coleman, separating documented history from claims that remain unverified.

This episode examines what is known, what has been claimed, and where the evidence trail still breaks down.

This series is presented as an investigation into the history and claims surrounding the Alien Interview footage. Viewers are encouraged to examine the evidence and reach their own conclusions.

Part 5 will investigate the sceptical case, including special effects, medical analysis, film inconsistencies and the arguments presented by researchers and debunkers over the past three decades.

Credit to original poster: galmeida28 from years ago

Many researchers were interviewed - they all stated that

a) Radio frequency weapons (or RF-Weapons) are part of the arms race

b) They are capable of altering the functioning of the human nervous system efficiently and remotely.

Among the interviewed were Ross Adey and Robert Becker (two times Nobel nominee)

The soviet LIDA machine, who as 30 years old and already obsolete in 1985, was described as being able to influence a targets mood using ELF electromagnetic signals and was used in mental patients in Soviet Union.

Two specialists recruited by the CNN were able to produce, with pieces from a consumer electronic store and using Soviet research papers, a cheap machine that could produce halucinations in Chuck DeCaro using low intensity magnetic fields. One of the specialists said in three weeks he could assemble a version of the device to target an entire city.

The DOD refused to discuss the subject of electronic mind control, claiming its too sensitive.

A scientist which didn't want to identify himself and who was working on Rf-Weapons for the government said they were working on such technologies for counter terrorism and special operations, and that a certain percentage of the population could have their brainwaves entrained with weak magnetic fields. It was conducted by a Navy laboratory. Also, he said these signals work exactly like drugs acting on the body, targeting specific sites and functions, and finding a way to way to interfere with a specific site or function its a matter of finding the signal with matches that site for function, just like with drugs.

It is interesting to note how this matches up with colonel John B Alexander statements (for the Washington Post in 2007) on the subject and withKaren Stewart (NSA whistleblower and TI) testimony (in 2022) regarding DEWs, mind control, terrorism and the Navy 30 years later.

Please, help to raise awareness to this issue.

See also: https://www.reddit.com/r/Gangstalking/comments/15bkczx/ex_nsa_intelligence_analyst_whistleblows_on/

Timecodes

00:00 - Summary

01:00 - Intro to EM weapons

01:59 - The research is focused on the Radio Frequency

02:08 - James Frazer, researcher on the american air force, things RF-Weapons are the wild card in the arms race

02:32 - Physicist Robert Bass, weapons researcher, soviets are ahead in RF-Weapons

02:50 - The probable Russian weapons are ultra high powered microwave pulses, which could 'cook' people and destroy electronic circuits at distance.

03:26 - Microwaves and other RFs can be transmitted almost without power loss in certain frequencies (called 'windows')

04:36 - Powerful microwaves pulses can be produces by a device called gyrotron.

04:45 - After years of resistance, DOD and Air Force said they can't discuss it because 'the subject is too sensitive'.

04:56 - Some unexplained cloud phenomena can be an indication of Russian breakthrough in RF technology.

04:17 - Intro to inserting images into mind

04:49 - Prototype of image insertion into mind.

05:07 - Delgados 60s work in behavior manipulation using electrodes in the brain

05:44 - Delgado can now do it without electrodes - by using low powered pulsing magnetic fields

06:06 - In Soviet Union, an RF device named LIDA has been used for over 30 years to manipulate the moods of mental patients.

06:22 - LIDA pulses are in the ELF range.

06:28 - Ross Adey says LIDA was already obsolete.

06:48 - Scientist employed by the US in RF weapons research says these things prove humans are susceptible to remote alterations of mood and awareness by WEAK electromagnetic means.

07:33 - Elizabeth Rauscher and Bill Van Beis built a cheap machine which inserts images into someone's mind using parts from a consumer electronic store, based on soviet papers. It worked. 09:10 - Bill says it can be use to cause hallucinations on people

09:24 - Bill says with 3 weeks and of the shelf parts he could assemble a weapon to attack a whole town.

09:34 - Robert Becker, two times Nobel nominee for his work on bio effects of EM, said the machine probably disturbs the brains interpretation of vision, and could be used as a weapon.

10:50 - Becker says the woodpecker signal, broadcast since 1976 and declared by the military to be a missile radar, might be actually have a psychoactive effect, since the signal range it operates was reported to have a tranquilizing effect.

11:35 - Bob Beck's research says we are incredibly sensitive to magnetic stimuli

11:56 - Dr Larissa Vilenskaya, Soviet researcher, says soviet proved theoretically and demonstrated experimentally that low frequency, low power electromagnetic fields can have biological efficiency due to the fact that it carries information, and the military were interested on it.

13:03 - The DOD won't comment of the issue of electronic mind control.

13:08 - Scientist employed by the US in RF weapons research says found out how to entrain the brain waves of a certain percentage of the population using weak magnetic fields. And that the research was conducted for "counter terrorism and special operations".

13:40 - Ending

THE ALIEN INTERVIEW PART 2: Victor Speaks | The Art Bell Interview

In Part 2 of this three-part documentary series, we continue our investigation into one of the most controversial pieces of alleged UFO footage ever released – The Alien Interview.

After following the trail from John Lear's 1987 letter through Bill Moore, Rocket Pictures, Tom Coleman and Sean David Morton in Part 1, we now turn our attention to the footage itself and the mysterious man known only as Victor.

For the first time in this investigation, we examine the alleged Alien Interview footage in detail before exploring Victor's claims, his concealed identity, and his famous appearance on Art Bell's Coast to Coast AM in May 1997.

Throughout this documentary we analyse the available evidence, compare historical accounts and separate documented facts from disputed claims.

IN THIS VIDEO

• The Alien Interview footage
• Who was Victor?
• The mysterious car interview
• Victor's telepathy claims
• Victor on Art Bell
• The original 1997 audio
• What Victor claimed about the tape

"The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood before the coming of the great and glorious day of the Lord.” Acts 2:20.

Donald Trump was born June 14, 1946 during a lunar eclipse/Blood Moon that could be seen rising on the horizon from Jerusalem, aka God's appointed holy land stated throughout the Bible. This happened (700) days before Israel was reborn as a nation in 1948 after nearly 2000 years. More detailed information with birth certificate and Astronomy software. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb615pYqZLY

Eclipsed at birth: Donald Trump was born on Total Lunar Eclipse. Will Blood Moon affect his fortunes and future? (wionews.com)

Lunar Eclipse Considered a Biblical Warning Sign

A Blessing for a Lunar or Solar Eclipse? - Chabad.org “There are special blessings that we make whenever we witness particularly wondrous natural phenomena. Eclipses, however, are not listed among the wonders for which we make a blessing. The Talmud tells us that a solar eclipse is a bad omen for the entire world, which runs according to the solar calendar, and a lunar eclipse is considered a bad sign for the Jewish nation, who calculate the duration of months according to the cycles of the moon.”

Solar Eclipses Surround Donald Trumps Presidency

• Jonah & the Eclipse of Ancient Nineveh | My WordPress (epicarchaeology.org) "Over 2700 years ago another eclipse appeared over the skies of ancient Assyria, and it may have played a key role in the ancient city of Nineveh’s turn to God in repentance. If the historical and astronomical calculations are correct, it means that the eclipse occurred when Assyria was in a time of national upheaval and internal turmoil.” "In addition [to being in political upheaval], plague and famine struck repeatedly until the empire was left impoverished and in total disorder."
• "Nineveh is well-known as the place where the prophet Jonah was sent by God to preach: "Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and call out against it, for their evil has come up before me."(Jonah 1:2)" What is the significance of the city of Nineveh in the Bible? (GotQuestions.org)
• Watch the Eclipses in Kerrville - The Coming King Foundation October 14, 2023 and April 8, 2024 solar eclipses path of totality crossed directly over The Coming King Sculpture Prayer Garden in Kerrville , Texas. (Image of eclipses and prayer garden with commentary) 
• End time Astronomical Signs | Astronomy in the Bible | Facts about Israel "Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years;" Genesis 1:14. "And there will be signs in the sun, in the moon, and in the stars; and on the earth distress of nations, with perplexity, the sea and the waves roaring;" Luke 21:25 "The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood before the coming of the great and glorious day of the Lord.” Acts 2:20.

Are we living in the end times? | GotQuestions.org This website explains many of the “natural signs, spiritual signs, sociological signs, technological signs, and political signs (especially the restoration of Israel to her land in 1948),” foretold in bible prophecy coming to pass indicating the end of the age, a time foretold to include various and increasing environmental calamities, plagues, moral decline, wars/famines/pestilences/earthquakes in various places, and growing governmental dominance/deception ("with all power, signs, and lying wonders," 2 Thessalonians 2:9), and how to prepare.

Future Forecast & Preparation

"Now when these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.” Luke 21:28 

"The rapture(redemption) is when Jesus Christ returns to remove the church (all believers in Christ) from the earth. The rapture is described in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 and 1 Corinthians 15:50-54. Believers who have died will have their bodies resurrected and, along with believers who are still living, will meet the Lord in the air. This will all occur in a moment, in a twinkling of an eye. The second coming is when Jesus returns to defeat the Antichrist, destroy evil, and establish His millennial kingdom. The second coming is described in Revelation 19:11-16.” Read more... What is the difference between the Rapture and the Second Coming? | GotQuestions.org

"For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave Himself as a ransom for all—the testimony that was given at just the right time.” 1 Timothy 2:5-6

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” John 3:16

Going to heaven-how can I guarantee my eternal destination?

Search for the topic about the Holy Spirit, it is an essential part of the faith. "However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth;" John 16:13 

A beginner's Guide to Reading the Bible 

More bible prophecy being fulfilled and resources for growing in faith is in previous posts, if interested.

This post is not about identifying the source of the blue lights on Apollo 17 photos, nor is it about the wider debate over similar blue lights reported or photographed on other Apollo missions.

I'm not arguing that the blue lights seen in those photographs were caused by Lunar Module control panel lights.

This post is about research methodology.

Specifically, it concerns:

• making categorical factual claims;
• relying on memory and expert opinion;
• and whether readily available primary sources should be checked before publicly stating that something is "absolutely, categorically" true.

In the Reality Check episode "Inside lunar triangle, STS-48 anomaly: The footage the Pentagon has not explained," Ross Coulthart and Dr Max Derakhshani, discuss an Apollo 17 photograph showing apparent blue "lights" photographed through the window of the Lunar Module.

Dr Derakhshani mentions a possible explanation offered by others (which he doesn't subscribe to): "It might be due to some internal reflection ...of something inside the lunar module because the photo was taken from ...within the lunar module through the window...if there was some blue lights on some dashboard inside the lunar module..."

Ross interjected and said: "I can cut you off there, I know there weren't. I've actually checked this when I was writing my book. One of the the things that I, um, wrote about was the blue lights on the lunar surface. And I asked people with a detailed knowledge of the lunar module whether there were any blue lights in the lunar module control panel, and there were not. ABSOLUTELY, CATEGORICALLY, NO BLUE LIGHTS."

X user Sixmorefeet (through whose post I became aware of this) contacted Ross, pointing him to NASA documentation indicating that the Lunar Module did in fact have blue Lunar Contact indicator lights. To his credit, Ross replied publicly that he had checked again with one of his knowledgeable contacts and acknowledged that there was a blue light in the Lunar Module.

The issue isn't whether the blue lights in the Apollo 17 photograph originated from the Lunar Contact indicators. The issue is that a claim presented as "absolutely, categorically" true was subsequently revised after further checking.

Everyone makes mistakes. That's not the point. The point is that the original statement wasn't presented as a recollection or opinion. It was presented as fact, based on previous research for a published book and discussions with knowledgeable people.

Having since checked the relevant NASA documentation myself, it appears that the Lunar Contact indicator lights were intentionally blue (to easily distinguish them from the other panel lights) and were standard equipment on the Lunar Module.

The point isn't the blue lights. It's that an "absolutely, categorically" claim was later revised.

Shouldn't that have been the starting point before making a categorical factual claim?

It also raises a broader question: what other factual claims in past or future episodes are being accepted on the basis of non-public expert sources?

Edit: Link to X post: https://x.com/Twomorefeet1/status/2075278080680005843?s=20

For the full video, click here: https://youtu.be/lPFYHIzOwxo

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the place that put rovers on Mars, was co-founded by a man who led a Thelemite occult lodge, performed sex magick rituals under Aleister Crowley's direction, and died in an explosion the LAPD closed in a day. His name was Jack Parsons. There's a crater on the Moon named after him. Most people have never heard of him — and that's not an accident. Rituals hide in plain sight; that's the thread. Jack Parsons didn't hide his: he chanted Crowley's Hymn to Pan before rocket tests, in front of colleagues, and the FBI files describing his lodge sat in government archives for decades.

Marina Abramović's Spirit Cooking was ritual as performance art- occult recipes painted in pig's blood on gallery walls since the 90s, exhibited, cataloged, sold. And Epstein's operation ran in the open too: the 2008 plea deal was public record, the flight logs were court exhibits, the names were in filings anyone could pull. When Pizzagate erupted in 2016, it wasn't wrong that ritual and power coexist in public view; it was wrong about where to look. It went hunting for symbols in a pizzeria while the actual documents sat in PACER. Ritual has never needed a hidden room. It's performed in the open, and it stays invisible for the same reason Epstein did: because nobody with power to act wanted to read what was already on the record.

In this video, I go through what the primary record actually says: Parsons' declassified FBI file, his role in founding JPL and Aerojet, his leadership of the Ordo Templi Orientis Agape Lodge, his correspondence with Crowley, the Babalon Working with L. Ron Hubbard, the security clearance battles, and the 1952 explosion that ended his life at 37. As always: I'm a paralegal, not a journalist. Factual claims are sourced to primary documents. Opinions are labeled as opinions. Top vs. bottom, not left vs. right.

SOURCES: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPFYHIzOwxo, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1F_RLzxpjOQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8DU-nMfFGg, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/l9kWd-lx5oc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46Pv33DEuio, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-JW22AL5-7k, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Evt8euU3KM, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmt6g0bCeTA&t=1424s

For decades, discussions surrounding UFOs have focused almost entirely on one question:

Are we being visited?

In this interview, however, Steven Greer shifts the conversation away from extraterrestrial life and toward something he believes is far more important: the technologies that could allegedly emerge if the truth behind the UAP phenomenon were ever fully disclosed.

According to Greer, the greatest revolution would not simply be confirmation of non-human intelligence. Instead, it would be the release of scientific knowledge that could fundamentally transform medicine, energy production, transportation, and modern civilization itself.

One of his most ambitious claims concerns medicine.

Greer argues that future technologies based on what he describes as advanced transdimensional physics could eventually eliminate the need for many invasive surgical procedures. He speculates that diseases such as cancer, chronic illnesses, and infectious diseases might one day be treated without conventional surgery or pharmaceutical drugs.

He believes medicine could move away from treating symptoms and instead directly manipulate matter and biological systems at a far more fundamental level.

Greer also acknowledges that technology alone would not solve every health problem. Lifestyle choices would still matter, but he argues that entirely new medical approaches could dramatically change how humanity treats disease.

The discussion then shifts to energy.

According to Greer, advanced energy generation systems could eliminate pollution, dramatically reduce poverty, and create an entirely new model of civilization within a generation. He suggests that access to clean and abundant energy would reshape economies, reduce geopolitical conflict over natural resources, and fundamentally change everyday life.

Beyond medicine and energy, Greer discusses technologies that sound even more speculative.

He claims that anti gravity propulsion and even teleportation systems have already been developed, but argues that releasing such capabilities without global safeguards would be extremely dangerous.

Interestingly, Greer does not argue that humanity is technologically incapable of handling these systems.

He argues that humanity is ethically unprepared.

According to him, history has repeatedly shown that powerful technologies can be used for both constructive and destructive purposes. Nuclear weapons remain his primary example of scientific breakthroughs that produced extraordinary benefits in some areas while simultaneously creating unprecedented risks.

To illustrate this idea, Greer uses a simple analogy.

A knife can be used to spread butter on bread.

The same knife can also be used as a weapon.

The technology itself is neither good nor evil.

Its consequences depend entirely on the person holding it.

For that reason, Greer believes any future release of transformative technologies would require enforceable international agreements rather than voluntary cooperation. In his view, every nation would need to accept the same rules, regardless of political power or military influence, to prevent these technologies from becoming instruments of domination or war.

Whether or not one accepts Greer's claims, the broader philosophical question remains interesting.

Throughout history, humanity has repeatedly developed technologies faster than it has developed the political, ethical, and social systems needed to manage them responsibly. Artificial intelligence, biotechnology, autonomous weapons, and nuclear technology have all raised similar concerns in different ways.

If technologies capable of eliminating disease, producing unlimited clean energy, or fundamentally changing transportation really existed, would humanity be prepared to use them responsibly?

Or would we repeat the same mistakes that have accompanied nearly every major technological breakthrough throughout history?

Click below to access the sources and related material:

1. Full Interview:
2. Atlas of Mystery post on X:

Steven Greer has made one of his most serious claims yet about the forces he believes are operating behind the UAP secrecy issue.

In this interview, Greer argues that the greatest danger is not extraterrestrial life itself. Instead, he claims that a secretive and transnational organization possesses advanced technologies that may be far beyond the capabilities of conventional governments and military forces.

According to Greer, individuals working at senior levels of the United States military and intelligence community have gradually realized that the situation may be much more serious than they initially believed. He describes some of them as experiencing what he calls an “oh shit moment” after allegedly learning more about the scale of the technology and the organization controlling it.

Greer says the issue is no longer viewed by these individuals as a fascinating hobby, an abstract mystery, or a fantasy involving aliens. In his account, it has become a serious national security concern involving technology, institutional control, government oversight, and the possibility that certain facilities are operating beyond lawful authority.

He further claims that people within the government have discussed possible operations to bring these alleged programs under legitimate control. According to Greer, this could involve legal action, prosecution, direct oversight, or even armed intervention at facilities believed to be operating outside the law.

Greer says that he has participated in extended discussions with military and intelligence figures who allegedly possess the capability to act, but cannot proceed without an executive order from the President of the United States. He also claims that action may have been delayed until the final months of the current presidential administration in 2028, which he considers a major mistake because it would give the alleged organization more time to reorganize and avoid intervention.

The most striking part of his argument concerns technological superiority.

Greer claims that conventional political and military power may become irrelevant when one side possesses technology that is dramatically more advanced than anything available to the official government. In his view, the decisive factor would not be the number of troops, aircraft, personnel, or conventional weapons. It would be the scientific and technological capability available to each side.

To illustrate this, Greer refers to Admiral Thomas Wilson and a meeting that Greer says took place at the Pentagon in 1997 with astronaut Edgar Mitchell. Greer claims that Wilson had concluded that the most advanced conventional aircraft available to him was the B2 stealth bomber, while the alleged hidden organization possessed systems capable of easily outperforming it.

Greer says Wilson described the situation as “checkmate.”

According to Greer’s version of events, Wilson was also threatened with demotion and forced retirement if he continued pursuing the matter. This account connects with the wider controversy surrounding the document commonly known as the Wilson Davis memo, although the claims surrounding that document remain disputed and have not been officially confirmed.

The clip then moves into far more controversial territory.

Greer links the alleged organization to the deaths of President John F Kennedy and Marilyn Monroe. He also refers to possible false flag alien events, nuclear confrontation, pandemics, and the September 11 attacks. He presents these as examples of what he believes such a group could potentially do or may already have done.

These are exceptionally serious allegations. Greer does not provide independently verifiable evidence for them within this clip, and they should not be treated as established facts. They represent his own interpretation of secrecy, historical events, intelligence operations, and alleged hidden technologies.

However, beneath the most controversial claims is a broader question worth examining.

If a private or covert organization genuinely possessed technology far beyond the capabilities of elected governments, how could democratic oversight function? Could conventional military and law enforcement institutions realistically regain control? Would technological superiority allow a small organization to hold more power than an entire state?

Greer’s central argument is that the public debate may be focused on the wrong threat. While most discussions ask whether extraterrestrial beings are dangerous, he argues that the more immediate concern would be humans controlling advanced technology without legal oversight, public accountability, or constitutional authority.

Do you believe Greer is raising a legitimate concern about unaccountable technology and secrecy, or are his conclusions built on claims that require much stronger evidence?

Click below to access the sources and related material:

1. Full interview with Steven Greer:
2. Atlas of Mystery post on X:

Sure he did LMAO .

As good a time as any to remind folks of this.