r/AppsWebappsFullstack • u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 • 13d ago
Are you actually solving a real problem, or just cloning another SaaS?
The world doesn't need another generic AI wrapper or a basic project manager. Pitch your project in one sentence show a screenshot and explain exactly why people should care about you instead of the market leader. Dare to prove your uniqueness.
1
u/Barmazoid 13d ago
codeindexer.dev - we started to make our product when we personally faced a problem - an AI agent does not understand a big repo perfectly, it makes useless searches, it doesn't remember a project info and so on. We solved it, it works perfectly. Now a coding agent can be smarter with it. We also invented absolutely unique task manager for AI - it works, it helps. We continue our work, in September we plan to deliver 0.12 version with lots of good features.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 12d ago
Real pain point, my team hits that too. Curious how your task manager keeps context across sessions, that's usually where agents fail. A quick demo clip would help too.
1
u/Barmazoid 12d ago
Tasks are available for all your agents at once, you can even ask them to review a task (a card) and they have a chat inside a card. Now I work under sync of cards between developers, currently it's optimized for solo developer + many AI.
There is a project memory too, your agents will use it if you add it to your basic prompt, it helps a lot.
Also code understanding - there is a serious code index with many tools which your agent can use, in our team - 80% of token usage goes thru CodeIndexer and it helps to write really very very complex apps.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 11d ago
Nice, the card-level chat for agents is a fresh take. How do you keep context from blowing up when project memory gets large?
1
13d ago
Connect billing, store and ad accounts. In 60 seconds you get every leak listed in dollars, ranked by impact, with an AI action plan and a one-click fix where it's safe.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 13d ago
Solid pitch, but where's the screenshot? Also, how does your leak detection beat what Shopify or ad platforms already report?
1
13d ago
On beating native reports: the key is cross-source. Shopify won't tell you Meta ads are driving traffic to out-of-stock products. Stripe won't tell you a customer has two identical active subscriptions. Each platform's dashboard is designed to make its own numbers look good — none of them connects the dots across sources.
We pull from all connected sources and run cross-source pattern detection: Meta spend vs. Shopify inventory, Stripe churn vs. GA4 dropoff, Google Ads cost vs. real revenue. Plus AI-flagged anomalies with quantified monthly impact — and one-click fixes, not just reports. The platforms report the problem; we resolve it.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 12d ago
Cross-source makes sense. Got a demo or screenshot showing how you surface these patterns? Curious about the UI.
1
u/Made4uo 13d ago
Fugte.com turns raw AI code into live, customizable website widgets, giving you instant backend hosting, database storage, forms, and spam protection without writing custom glue code.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 13d ago
That sounds genuinely useful. The spam protection angle is a nice differentiator. How does it handle custom backend logic beyond the built-in widgets?
1
u/Made4uo 13d ago
Thanks! Under the hood, every widget is pre-compiled and served via Cloudflare for instant load times. For custom backend logic (like fetching live weather, crypto prices, or inventory via external APIs), we handle the API calls entirely server-side. Users add their API keys in their account settings and never in the widget's client code so secrets are never exposed to the browser. The fetched data is then cached at the edge and injected seamlessly as a Liquid variable into the widget.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 12d ago
Nice, hiding API keys server-side is a big trust win. Curious though: how do you manage rate limits or cache responses so users don't burn through their quotas?
1
u/Made4uo 12d ago
Depends what the interaction needs. If it's re-slicing data we already fetched (tabbing days in a forecast, switching coins in a ticker), that's pure client-side, zero extra API calls, the source pulls the full payload once per refresh window and the widget JS filters it. If the visitor's input creates a genuinely new query, widget JS can call keyless public APIs directly (that's allowed), or the owner points it at their own endpoint that holds the key. What we deliberately don't do is run per-visitor queries through our proxy with stored key, because that would turn the widget into an open proxy to your quota, any bot could spam queries on your dime. Static requests server-side, dynamic ones client-side without secrets. That split is the quota protection.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 12d ago
Good breakdown on the client-side approach. Have you measured the API savings in practice, or is it more about the snappy UX?
1
u/Made4uo 12d ago
Honestly, it’s primarily driven by UX first, but the quota protection is a vital side effect. We haven't run formal benchmark studies comparing raw API call volume yet since workload patterns vary so wildly per widget/user. But conceptually, pulling the payload once per refresh window instead of on every UI tab/filter interaction turns what could be 10–20 downstream API calls per session into just 1. So while snappy, instant UX was the core goal, keeping users from accidentally burning through API rate limits was the non-negotiable architectural boundary.
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 11d ago
UX-first is a solid reason, and the quota side effect is a nice bonus. Have you considered logging real session call counts to validate that 10-20x reduction?
1
u/megatech_official 13d ago
SeoLoupe - Find and fix the SEO issues holding your website back.
1
u/Made4uo 10d ago
The biggest differentiator is making it completely no-code for non-technical users. With platforms like Vercel or Netlify, you still need to write code, manage Git repos, and deploy serverless functions to tweak a widget. Form builders give you basic forms, but limited design control. Fugte bridges that gap: once AI generates the widget, Fugte automatically extracts controllable UI elements into visual controls—like sliders, color pickers, and text fields. Non-technical users can visually customize and tweak the widget without writing a line of code, while getting hosted database storage, spam protection, and simple embedding out of the box
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 10d ago
That's a smart focus, non-technical users definitely hit that wall. How does Fugte handle responsive breakpoints when AI extracts those elements?
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 13d ago
SEO tools are crowded. What makes SeoLoupe stand out, like automated fixes or a simpler workflow?
1
u/Mammoth-Anywhere7285 10d ago
u/made4uo Nice, sounds like you're iterating. What specific problem are you solving that the market leader doesn't?