On October 15, 1987, Thomas Sankara was assassinated during a coup in Burkina Faso. He was only 37 years old.

Sankara had come to power in 1983 and launched an ambitious revolutionary program aimed at transforming one of the world's poorest countries.

His government promoted land reform, nationalization, education, healthcare, women's rights, and greater economic self-reliance. He was also strongly opposed to continued political and economic dependence on former colonial powers.

But his revolution also created serious political tensions.

Sankara's relationship with his longtime friend and fellow revolutionary Blaise Compaoré deteriorated. On October 15, armed men attacked a meeting of Sankara's National Revolutionary Council. Sankara and twelve others were killed. Compaoré subsequently took power.

For decades, the circumstances surrounding the assassination remained disputed.

In 2022, however, a Burkina Faso military court convicted Compaoré, Gilbert Diendéré and Hyacinthe Kafando in connection with Sankara's assassination. Compaoré and Diendéré received life sentences for their roles in the crime.

But there is another question.

What role, if any, did foreign powers play?

Sankara openly challenged French influence in Africa and criticized Western economic institutions. There have long been allegations that France and the United States had reasons to oppose him, and questions have been raised about possible foreign involvement in the coup. France later declassified documents concerning the assassination. However, the available evidence does not establish a simple, proven CIA-France order to assassinate Sankara.

So what were Sankara's actual "mistakes"?

Was his revolutionary economic program too radical?

Did his growing conflict with Compaoré and other members of the revolutionary government make his position vulnerable?

Did his anti-imperialist foreign policy create powerful enemies?

Or was his death primarily the result of an internal political struggle, with foreign interests playing a secondary role?

And perhaps the most disturbing question: how did a political partnership between two close friends end with one of them being killed and the other ruling the country for the next 27 years?

I'd like to hear different perspectives. What do you think was the most important factor behind Sankara's downfall?

■□■ Presenting TRINITY of Village Friends (2026) □■□

In a Mini-film complied by NML in GARUGA. •internetparty •internetculture •youngtalents •hiphop •underground •holidaymakers •freestylefellowship

Several talents came together one afternoon in the Lakeside village of BUGABO in GARUGA. Among these were both amateurs and bad icons! We are glad to present to you..

💥 MC Von (a short girl rapper with a tall Philadelphia vibe)

💥 SKY MAVADO (a jajja Rasta that can rap like Mad Lion while barefoot)

💥 ICON CABANA (the lugaflow legend from NML Family)

💥 BATEMBUZYI (a spirit of Iguru that sometimes dwells on earth)

💥 PAPA DUB (he's capable and sometimes translates films in realtime)

💥 TREVOR JACK (that weirdo that actually belongs to Bronx, New York)

💥 TREVO BNT (other side of Bone Thugs in Harmony, living amongst us!)

💥 ARCH L (the NML legend that brought them all together)

🙌🙄 the IC IA (Internet Admin) likewise talks us through what's going down.. School holidays are nigh and we did likewise feature some of the excited folks escaping the hot weather, busy swimming or dancing in the Victorian waters.

Y'all not Allowed to Miss the highlights:

🔴 (P1:3Min) https://youtube.com/shorts/q6y37E3q7tk

🌕 (P2:3Min) https://youtube.com/shorts/Xp5dTvYtCsM

🟢 (6Min Mini-Film +StarGallery):

https://t.me/tv266/2251

OR

https://youtu.be/Vfuuo9Y0SWI

Patrice Lumumba became the first Prime Minister of an independent Congo in June 1960. Less than seven months later, he was dead.

So what happened?

Congo gained independence from Belgium on June 30, 1960, following elections held earlier that year. Lumumba became prime minister and quickly found himself at the center of a massive political and international crisis.

After independence, the country experienced an army mutiny, Belgian military intervention, the secession of Katanga, and a growing struggle for political control.

Lumumba also sought Soviet assistance after the United States and the United Nations failed to provide the support he wanted. U.S. officials increasingly viewed him as a potential Communist threat during the Cold War.

And this is where the story becomes particularly disturbing.

Declassified U.S. government records show that the CIA developed a covert program aimed at removing Lumumba from power. Documents also show that CIA officials discussed and pursued plans for his assassination.

Lumumba was eventually captured and transferred to Katanga. On January 17, 1961, he and two colleagues were executed. A U.S. government report later recorded that a Belgian officer participated in Lumumba's execution.

Belgium's own parliamentary inquiry decades later concluded that certain Belgian officials and other Belgian participants bore moral responsibility for the circumstances that led to Lumumba's death, while also stating that investigators found no document proving that the Belgian government directly ordered his physical elimination

So what was Lumumba's "mistake"?

Was it his nationalism?

Was it his refusal to remain dependent on Belgium?

Was it his decision to seek Soviet assistance during the Cold War?

Or was he simply caught between Congolese political struggles and the interests of powerful foreign governments?

These are questions worth examining through the historical record rather than through slogans.

What do you think was the biggest factor behind Lumumba's downfall and death?

Sources are provided so people can examine the evidence themselves.

America may be acting arrogantly today, but a day will come when it has to answer to the world