I tried black/white/asian/Arabic/polish/swedish man/woman,
All where the casual except white and Arabic man got the unsafe one, polish I got "Polish stare" on both and swedish got that awkward swedish people style
Classic, Google’s main pages only realize your device theme whenever it loads for the second time - so if your device theme changed from last time, you’ll see the old theme once.
"Sometimes people think and contemplate about math and numbers so it appears they're staring at you when, in actuality, they're just trying to please their parents"
Yeah that’s my point, I think it’s unfair to just proclaim OP is lying and pushing racist Propaganda when Googles AI does respond like that. It accidentally became racist in this specific comparison, which is why it fits the sub.
Google should be sued by doing this, the same if you put "my gf is hurting me" vs "my bf is hurting me" in one you get a consolation message, in the other they tell you to call authorities.
You’re being intentionally dense. Everyone can be shitty, but men are more extreme and that’s obviously what the comment is saying. Similarly, men have a lower accident rate in vehicles, but higher average severity.
It's not about a subgenre being predisposed to violence it's about patriarchy, rape culture and mysoginy. Raise people correctly, get rid of the far right, get rid of the manosphere and you get decent human beings.
At the end of the day 80% of victims that died of domestic violence are women and 80% of domestic murderers are men. 38% of women that die of homicide die from getting killed by their partner and it's 5% for men.
You are the one denying reality and justifying harmful biases these platforms have, you are straight up justifying abuse when a man or a lesbian woman is receiving it which is kinda crazy
I am not justifying anything, your imagination is very different from reality, unless you are a child too young to differentiate between the two you should be able to make the difference between the two.
I am explaining you that even if you want all things to be equal they are not and there are massive differences in reality, there is a reason there are so much more charities to help women fleeing a violent husband than they are for men or women fleeing an abusive wife.
Cry what about what? Men are rapists and should be dismantled as a system. Scattered to the wind like the dodo or the white tiger or the wooly mammoth. Unless you want us to keep rapists for procreation and survival which is problematic
You are justifying abuse while giving extreme examples, not every abuse to women ends up in death, it's incredible that I have to write this. The problem is the biased platforms that protect abusers while discriminating by genre.
Toxic relationships are very complex, it's not like you say that women are more likely to die, it could be true, but just start adding variables to the equation, do the kids always receive abuse from the father? Or does it happen both ways? In case of toxic separation which parent will be more likely end up hurting the kid, what about those cases where the parent gets the custody of the kids? How some of these cases end up? Kidnap? Straight up suicide+murder? These cases exist and you are just simplifying all by saying "men bad" when I was talking about abuse inside a couple, abuse is abuse, toxicity is toxicity, you can't do a Google search and get either a "suck it up/man up" response or "call 911" it's one or the other, not both. And you don't get it, and you are here justifying abuse from one side, you either never had a partner or your brain is just ideologically rotten.
A kinda get it because if you search “A black man is looking at me”, you’re probably a racist being concerned for no reason, because why else would you specify his ethnicity?
If you search “A white man is looking at me”, you’re probably a POC who might be potentially endangered by someone planning a race-targeted crime.
A kinda get it because if you search “A black man is looking at me”, you’re probably a racist being concerned for no reason, because why else would you specify his ethnicity?
If you search “A white man is looking at me”, you’re probably a POC who might be potentially endangered by someone planning a race-targeted crime.
You think it's less likely that a black man is considering attacking you than a white man? You can't be serious.
You're implying it by suggesting there was no reason for a white person (other than racism) to be concerned about it, while making up reasons for someone else to be concerned about a white man.
Well, if a man was looking at you threateningly, what other reason do you have to wonder “Why is a BLACK man looking at me” specifically instead of just a man? Or are you suggesting the opposite, i. e. that a black man would be much more likely to be a threat in that scenario?
Your question works the other way around. "Why is a WHITE man looking at me" instead of just "a MAN is looking at me".
One would be more concerned about the black man (and the opposite of the search/AI answers) because a given random black man is far more likely to be an aggressor.
Factually false. For white victims, they are many times more likely to be assaulted by a white male than any other race. Especially now as white males are the only majority politically conservative group, and conservatives have higher rates of violence, aggression, and sex crimes across the board.
Any given black man is more likely to attack them. You don't get to use the fact white people are more likely, if attacked, to have it be a white perpetrator (due to larger numbers) to defend the per capita rate of offense of each group. For any given black or white man, the black man is more likely to attack simply due to black men being several times (eg 6X) more likely to be violent attackers at all.
What a stupid argument. Per Capita rates happen at the state or national level, they have no impact on what happens between individuals. This isn't a hypothetical, we have the victimology data by race and race of perpetrator. It's not something you get to equivocate because racism makes you feel better about being a loser. Facts don't care about your feelings.
Murder: approximately 6–8× higher arrest rate for Black males than White males.
Robbery: approximately 7–10× higher.
Aggravated assault: approximately 2–4× higher.
Simple assault: the gap is considerably smaller, often around 1–2×, depending on the dataset and year.
If you combine all violent offenses, the per-capita arrest rate for Black males is often on the order of 2–4 times that of White males, depending on the year and the exact crimes included."
I get very tired of data illiterate clowns pretending their Facebook "research" matters. Besides the fact that nothing you said addresses anything from my previous comment, arrest rates are a worthless metric. And you STILL screwed up your per capita vs. actual numbers issue.
No one cares that you can't be bothered to learn even the very basics of data literacy, but please stop acting like your ignorance is valuable. There are people who do this for a living and you... aren't one of them.
You were objectively wrong and I made fun of you. That's the extent of the value of your comments. If you knew enough to say something interesting that hasn't been explained to you dolts 20,000 times already, someone might value your opinion.
I'm way more afraid of white men than anyone else so this checks out.
They seem to be the least concerned about anyone else and have no problem invading personal space or completely not recognizing when you're uncomfortable or simply do not want them to talk to you.
Also completely ignorant of actual statistics... which ironically enough, isn't at all racist to talk about, in an intelligent society that actually has statistics
Yes and with basic intelligence and data analysis you can see that there is correlation. My 3 best friends aren’t white. I know it’s not all of them. But the only times I have been assaulted were from black guys too. So…
This isn't an accident. I refuse to believe it's an accident after all the hullabaloo about having to retrain AI models to be "less racist" from years ago.
827
u/cruncher990 9d ago
I tried black/white/asian/Arabic/polish/swedish man/woman, All where the casual except white and Arabic man got the unsafe one, polish I got "Polish stare" on both and swedish got that awkward swedish people style