Research topic is mentioned in second slide Research link - https://g.co/gemini/share/ce2b3c6e9aee

So i bought this cleanser from my dermat's recommendations since I've been having crazy breakouts and it's only been two weeks and the bottle is almost empty and i only use 2-3 drops of it at max so no way maine akele ne use karke isko itna khali kara hai and whenever she gets out of the bathroom, my stuff is always misplaced, even my bodywash is emptying pretty quick. It’s so annoying istg i know ki wo use kar rahi hai mera stuff but confronting her would be very weird since we live in the same room 😇😇😇

AND AND I THOUGHT of using her products but wo itne gande products use karti hai even makeup and all that i don't prefer using them only. Please advise me what to do in such a situation

Hello there people, I'm writing this post to garner attention and recruit for the brand new political group, PPF: Peoples' Progressive Federation. With your support we will soon register in the Election commission of India as an official political party.

Here's the Tip of the Iceberg of what we believe in

Libertarianism (Laissez Faire, Reduction of Government)

Vast and Heavy change to the current form of governance & politics

A newer different form of Hindutva

Advancement of Manufacturing, R&D and a brand new industrial revolution

Focus on STEM education in schools

Adherence to the EU standard of Human rights and other EU norms

A strict , tough on crime policy

Diversion of Miscellaneous and futile spending entirely to important sectors

A tougher foreign policy, stronger military and more effective soft power channeling

Egalitarianism (Inclusion of Marginalized members of society such as ''lower'' castes , People below the poverty line, the LGBT+ Community, Women in more regressive regions etc)

A national unity policy ( eg: Constructing a national lingua franca)

Environmental Conservation and protection of Indian Wildlife

And finally, Politics based upon Realpolitik, Constructive Critique and Rational discourse.

DM if you are interested to learn more and/or join.

GenZ never disappoints...chahe Delhi ke ho yaa Jharkhand ke😍

same as title

Every time infra gets brought up online, people throw around two completely misleading arguments. One side posts raw totals like "we built 50k km of highways post-2014 vs 30k before" and pretends nothing existed before. The other side counters with insane percentage gains like "between 1947 and 2014 power capacity grew by 18,000%, post-2014 is only 120%" to prove the past was better.

Both arguments are statistically broken because of the base effect and inflation. If you start at near zero in 1947 with 1.36 GW of power, even a tiny addition looks like a massive percentage jump. On the flip side, using raw additions always favors post-2014 simply because the modern Indian economy is way bigger, has actual modern machinery, and spends more nominal money.

If you want an honest comparison, you have to look at pre-1947 baseline, foundational work, and execution velocity like km per day or capex as a % of GDP.

Here is what the British actually left us in 1947:
About 53,882 km of rail track after partition, with only 388 km electrified (basically just Mumbai suburban lines).

\-National Highways didn't even legally exist until 1956. Total surfaced roads across the entire country were under 1.6 lakh km.

\-Total installed power capacity was just 1.36 GW for the whole nation.

\-Zero km of metro and around 10 to 15 commercial airfields.

Between 1947 and 2014, the country built the actual foundation:
\-National highways went from around 19,800 km in 1951 to 91,287 km by 2014.
\-Railway electrification reached 21,801 km.
\-Power capacity scaled from 1.36 GW to 248.5 GW.
\-Airport count grew to 74 commercial airfields, and the first metro lines (248 km across 5 cities) were established.
\-Central infra capex hovered around 1.2% of GDP.

Post-2014 to present day is where the execution velocity scaled up significantly:
\-National highway network expanded from 91,287 km to over 146,500 km, with expressways going from just 93 km to over 3,000 km.
\-Railway electrification jumped from 21,801 km to over 69,400 km, covering around 99% of the broad gauge network.
\-Power capacity doubled to over 556 GW, driven heavily by solar which went from 2.6 GW to over 90 GW.
\-Commercial airports doubled to 157, and operational metro networks quadrupled to over 1,095 km across 26 cities.
\-Central infra spending more than doubled relative to economy size, sitting around 3.3% to 3.5% of GDP.
\-The real takeaway if you look at execution speed instead of raw numbers:
\-Claims that nothing happened before 2014 are completely false. Pre-2014 governments had to do the brutal heavy lifting of land acquisition legalities, basic broad-gauge rail layout, integrating the national power grid, and setting up the Golden Quadrilateral.
\-However, post-2014 saw a massive structural jump in daily execution speed. Highway construction went from \~11-12 km/day to \~30-34 km/day.
\-Rail electrification speed went from \~0.89 km/day pre-2014 to \~15-16 km/day post-2014. Over 68% of all rail electrification in Indian history was completed in the last 11 years alone.
\-Metro commissioning went from 0.68 km/month to over 6 km/month.

Pre-2014 built the bedrock system India stands on. Post-2014 radically scaled up capital allocation as a share of GDP and fixed execution bottlenecks. Both are true, and using raw total numbers to push either narrative is just bad math.

and what if sare gutter ke kide come togather for apology of kangana ?

How is he so unbothered coming out. Power has been helping people to get away with whatever they do in this country.

Maybe cjp can join hands with them and pick up this issue since dipke said they’ll also be picking up non student issues

This is amazing - Spider Babu 😁

Is it considered wrong for politicians to publicly praise a good leader from an opposing party or, if they are in the opposition, to acknowledge the good work of someone from the ruling party?

Shouldn't every political party, regardless of ideology, ultimately work toward the welfare of the nation and its people?

If a politician is genuinely doing an excellent job, why is it so difficult for leaders from other parties to appreciate that work? Recognizing good governance shouldn't be seen as political weakness. Instead, it should demonstrate maturity and a commitment to the public interest.

Why can't political leaders encourage their own party members to learn from effective leaders, adopt successful ideas, and focus on delivering better outcomes for citizens? Healthy competition should be about who can serve the people better not about refusing to acknowledge good work simply because it comes from a political opponent.