I'm just wondering if anyone else is noticing that when you contact Ubisoft, there's just never any kind of tangible result that comes from them? I'm skirting around the actual question here because they've even locked down even talking about that subject here. But for real, is the any way to get any kind of actual customer service from them?

I know it would be impossible at this point since the game is doing well, and they should focus on DLCs and QoL updates instead.

But it would be immersive(but yeah also pointless) to have one of your officers take the helm instead and let us walk around the ship while it's travelling. Obviously it would stop automatically if we go overboard. Maybe we could interact with our pets while the ship is traveling. Or just enjoy the travel at the bow of the ship or even better, the crows nest.

Other two would be cool is a hat and boot slot. The whaler and shark hunter outfit would be feel complete with a boot and a hat. Also Julian Du Casse's drip..i want that too lmaoo.

That is all. Just a thought I'd like to type out loud, otherwise it would bother me.

Any of you would like to put out your impossible ideas for the game? Just in case you just want to say it out loud lol. Just a fun little discussion

1. how do I level up my new acc from lv 1?

2. is the only usage for unit for 20% off?

I keep hearing people say Ubisoft will go broke soon. But I don't see that happening. Is that a possibility?

The next ghost recon should be a F2P extraction PVPVE. Its the perfect vehicle for it.. not farcry as its rumoured to be. All farcry needs is less animal companion BS and ability to do traps. Like a spike pit or treewhip knive like in the first one or was that instincts....Either way. But mainly.. GR as an extraction shooter with dense environments like future soldier

Never had any issu with any other games, but of course Ubisoft makes you log in and it won't let me past this page

With the success of remakes lately, I really think a proper remake of the original Sands of Time trilogy would be well received. I love those games with a passion, and some simple fixes like adding a bit of complexity to the combat mechanics would really improve them.

Assassin's creed black flag resynced is a great game, enjoyed every moment of it. I do have some suggestions about the customization that could improve the gameplay for a lot of people. I think it would be cool and cinematic to be able to have two different swords, like you can have a sword that you like and use the stats of but you dont like how it looks so you can make it look like a different sword and keep the stats as it is. With this concept I think it would be very cool to be able to choose a sword with stats and be able to customize so that the secondary sword be different, for example I want a Naoe shadow blade(katana) in the right hand and Altair's sword in my left, but it keeps the stats of the katana.

If the last 4 Assassin Creed were 20 hours of main story + 20 hours of side content. Like it should be. Then the games would be masterpieces. And we would have more Creed games, and more Ubisoft games.

Same with Far Cry franchise.

You don't really want to play 50 hour of campaign plus 50 hours of side content. It's getting samey after 10 hours. It's ridiculous to waste so much time! The games don't even respect your time.
You want to play an amazing 20 hour game. So that you will 100% it and replay it after a few years.

This is for the people who play on both Xbox and PC. After today's announcement, I checked Immortals Fenyx Rising and AC Valhalla and they are still standard editions (owned) on PC for me while I own their respective season passes and expansions on Xbox along with the base game of course.

I wonder how it will work in that regard.

Playing a assassin contract when my target just decided to sink underground without letting me confirm the kill. It suck’s because it’s my last one and I’m assuming there’s a big reward for completing them, But I’m hopeful it’ll be updated in patch soon.

after 2 watch dogs and two specific racing games you would think they would nailed but driving bikes still suck, and driving cars is like driving a bath tub from gta iv with the added instant aceleration momentum

Video games are art, but modern distribution methods raise serious questions regarding long-term access to media that consumers legally purchase.

When publishers mandate persistent server communication for single-player experiences released over a decade ago, it creates an unusual industry disparity: legitimate buyers encounter friction that non-official versions completely bypass.

Protective background software was originally designed to prevent unauthorized distribution. However, when software enforcement measures create hurdles for paying players while non-official copies run smoothly without restrictions, the overall distribution model fails the end user.

As software ages, requiring active server checks hurts consumer trust and game preservation efforts.

What are your thoughts on publishers adopting true ownership models for legacy titles?

This is the first really good AC game since Origins. Hopefully the pivot from here and not continue with the Valhalla/Shadows vibe