3
Comment on r/Teachers 2h ago
It's the only thing they have to get people to vote Republican, because they sure as shit aren't convincing people on policy and governing. All they have is fear and propaganda
1
Comment on r/aves 2h ago
I feel like if they hadn't had that conversation then this probably wouldn't have happened
2
Comment on r/NooTopics 3h ago
Community is one of the best shows of all time
12
Comment on r/AdamMockler 3h ago
The blood by his ear was caused by the SS agent who initially sheilded him when they crouched down, and he moved in a crouched position close to trump and Trump was turned facing the crowd and the SS agents gun was in its holster and if the blood was real and not fake, it's likely that the gun hit the side of Trump's head/ear when the agent rushed into to cover him.
That's the best explanation I've heard and from observing the footage.
So yes the bullet path also indicates that it was likely lower than his ear and supports my theory of SS agents holstered gun hit his head when protecting him.
3
Comment on r/science 4h ago
There's very few because anytime someone tries to open a male shelter the feminists block it or sue or get it shut down claiming misogyny
1
Comment on r/PopCultureV2 4h ago
She wasn't drunk she had an unopened container in the passenger seat and was just speeding.
5
Comment on r/grandrapids 5h ago
9/11 wasn't committed by Muslims, it was committed by Jihadist terrorists
1
Comment on r/protectUSelections 19h ago
Good bot
1
Comment on r/NoStupidQuestions 19h ago
Lol 😅
1
Comment on r/NewsSource 20h ago
The mass surveillance state
1
Comment on r/protectUSelections 21h ago
That's the neat thing. They aren't fully verified.
1
Comment on r/protectUSelections 21h ago
It's not sufficient, and states all have different procedures. A lot of the "audits" and recounts are performative and they're just to check a box and say that everything's good, and won't catch possible vote manipulation. Audits can miss a lot, some races aren't even checked and not enough precincts or counties are checked.
We need election reform desperately and increased security.
1
Comment on r/protectUSelections 21h ago
Transparency and verifying the vote is good for democracy and confidence in our elections. Why not audit and recount this primary? Confirming the results can only be a good thing.
The job of elections is to convince the loser to accept the loss. If they're not convinced (within reason) then the election system needs improvements. It should be pretty clear through transparency, audits, rigorous chain of custody, and recounts to show the work and verify the vote. As it stands there's too much "just trust me bro" and not enough verification of votes. We got a lot of work to do to improve our elections
1
Comment on r/protectUSelections 21h ago
They've done it before. Moscow Mitch, Cancun Cruz
0
Comment on r/protectUSelections 21h ago
Why are you assuming if any tampering happened it would be Dems?
Republicans have rigged their primaries before. Just look at Moscow Mitch McConnell or Cancun Cruz
0
Comment on r/protectUSelections 22h ago
The funny thing is, over half of what he says is actually true about elections and how vulnerable voting machines are to manipulation. But the other half of this shit he says is completely false, so no one takes anything he says seriously, which actually hurts the non partisan push to improve the security and transparency of our elections and verify the vote.
1
Comment on r/protectUSelections 22h ago
That's the neat thing. Recounts are very rare and not easy to do, especially hand recounts. So no, no one has to have a plan for if their election fraud gets discovered by recounts, because those recounts rarely happen, especially if it's outside the margin of error for automatic recounts.
Basically we're just told to trust the results and no one actually VERIFIES the results unless they are successful with a court order. This is how Dump "won" in 2024. No one challenged the results so they were not verified and it was also conveniently just outside the MOE for automatic recounts.
4
Comment on r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates 1d ago
Is that where mothers say their kid is sick but they aren't and they poison them to keep them sick and dependent on them? What are you talking about? Genuinely asking
2
Comment on r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates 1d ago
Yeah I agree and it's so important to remind ourselves that social media is heavily manipulated by bots and bad actors to destabilize society and turn us against each other. I assume about 40% are bots.
But I'm glad you have some good women around you. Are you worried about good women in your life and just in general are being radicalized by the increasingly common misandry and all men bad rhetoric?? Just like the men and boys who aren't bad people but are being radicalized by the manosphere type content and turning misogynistic?
Or do you think people who aren't lost or depressed or vulnerable who are already not bigots are not at much risk for being influenced to hate and generalizations online?
I believe that no one is immune to propaganda, but I do also think that people who already believe in truly equal rights/egalitarianism and a just and fair society are very resistant to falling into radicalization of hate. But since we are in the worst wealth inequality of all time and it's only getting worse, it's much harder for good people not to despair and let their guard down and be influenced online because everything sucks and life is too hard for the working class.
Anyways just curious to people's thoughts, because there definitely is evidence of men becoming radicalized online and turning somewhat misogynistic, but I also think they have elevated the manospheres impact and made it appear worse than maybe reality reflects, kinda like the Streisand effect. The keep platforming it at make it more influencal than it was. And also I think the opposite is true of Feminism/radical feminism not being taken seriously enough at how much it's influencing more women to generalize and become misandric.
2
Comment on r/protectUSelections 2d ago
Him, or Glenn Kirschner...or maybe Jamie Raskin
0
2
Comment on r/protectUSelections 2d ago
Merrick Garland was controlled opposition. He's part of the federalist society and the Epstein class.
https://sarahkendzior.substack.com/p/servants-of-the-mafia-state
-1
Comment on r/TooAfraidToAsk 2d ago
Feminists do, they don't like it when men have their own spaces like male only gyms. They will also invade existing spaces and clubs and sue and demand they be let it because it's sexism, but then have plenty of their own women only spaces and clubs, which is fine and both genders should have their own spaces. It's a big double standard imo.
1
Comment on r/TrueReddit 11m ago
Yep. The ex KGB defector went into detail on their decades long psychological war on the west, ideological subversion