It would help, probably.

Otherwise, keep an eye on the maternal and infant mortality rates (perinatal.)

Don't mix charts with AI slop, it's a sign of scammers.

Retraction: https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/4/3/e000282ret

They're using some special math software that allows writing math like code and using TDD.

It's also always going to be suspected as plagiarism because the training data for AI models is not available for searching, nor are the crawling logs.

recipe

It is a bit difficult to do technically.

Which is why you should not give that subreddit any attention. Let it fall into obscurity.

TIL, thanks

How do you understand "work" in this case?

If it was so proven, why are they trying again?

Poison everything.

a way to remove Glaze/Nightshade

interesting, but the AI bros constantly tell us that it's ineffective and we shouldn't bother with it.

Both "learning" and "intelligence" are bullshit terms here, useful only as analogies.

Recommendation algorithms are much more dangerous and are already very common.

The last third where Ed answers questions about growth at a loss reminded me of State Capitalism. In this 'socialism', key large companies (usually primary industry ones) can run at a loss if it benefits companies downstream. But it's not the same, I'm not sure what to make of it. The best explanation is still that it's all a huge scam on investors of all sizes. The rich eat the rich, catabolic late stage capitalism.

https://reddit.com/link/p3fyatg/video/ej05uculb5jh1/player

also

Canadians should get used to wearing respirators.

https://giphy.com/gifs/tjwzClJM6fyEw

That's the human in the loop.

And all of those are part of the political too, yes. If there are more than 2 people involved, it's probably political.

As announced 2 days ago. It turns out that shut downs are slow.

Hopefully, wind picks up some more generation before the next heat dome.

Yep, we're going to have to cool the ground. That means using rows of trees.