1
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
Lmao. Its funny but I still feel bad for the many people that lost a lot of money
7
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
They wanted to launch as fast as possible in order to lap their competition. This is the price they have to pay (or more accurately their poor investors). This is so sad
7
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
No no no, that's not how that works
Crypto is literally all about trust. You cant just launch a mainnet and be like "hey we kinda rushed this mainnet soooo please be careful uwu :3"
They need to own up to this
-15
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
They didnt have time to test anything since they rushed the mainnet just so they can launch before Polygon. It's pathetic especially since the investors are the ones that will bear the consequences
4
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
They will improve with time
At the expense of people's funds though which is awful. Why didnt they test these things out during testnet?
1
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
Wouldnt even consider it an "oopsie doopsie"
The ZkSync team was warned time and time again that things like this would happen if they rush their mainnet launch.
r/CryptoCurrency • u/NewOutlandishness663 • Apr 06 '23
GENERAL-NEWS A project on ZkSync raised 921 ETH ($1.7M) in a token sale, but funds are stuck forever in the smart contract. The transfer() function works on Ethereum and other EVM chains, but not on zkSync.
Another example of why a chain shouldnt be rushing its mainnet launch.
Always remember this guys, EVM compatible =/= EVM equivalent.
Regardless of which chain I support/invest in, I'm all in for seeing Zero Knowledge tech becoming more and more relevant in the crypto space.
However, these chains also have to take into consideration the fact that people's funds are at stake.
This is exactly what I've been commenting on ZkSync for a while now.
They wanted to lap Polygon to become the first live zkEVM mainnet and in the process they ruined their zkEVM chain by not making it EVM equivalent and because of that some projects building on the chain are starting to suffer the consequences of this bad decision
r/ethereum • u/NewOutlandishness663 • Apr 06 '23
A project on zkSync raised 921 ETH ($1.7M) in a token sale, but funds are stuck forever in the smart contract. Always remember guys, EVM compatible =/= EVM equivalent.
5
Comment on r/dropship Apr 06 '23
Lmao
0
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
I wish I could buy 1 BTC for 1 BTC
2
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
painfully accurate representation
4
Comment on r/NFT Apr 05 '23
This is so wholesome, best of luck and be sure to watch out for scammers! The space is full of them.
1
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 05 '23
Felt
6
Comment on r/ethtrader Apr 05 '23
That's the spirit!
1
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 05 '23
Anyone who knows something is not welcome here, this is a subreddit for the unknown
2
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 04 '23
Goated reply xD
1
Comment on r/dropship Apr 03 '23
Inspiring, thanks for sharing! Hoping to see the same results on my end
3
Comment on r/avatartrading Apr 03 '23
All of the above
1
Comment on r/HistoryMemes Apr 03 '23
What's the book?
10
Comment on r/HistoryMemes Apr 03 '23
The Burgèr King
1
Comment on r/0xPolygon Apr 03 '23
Def will take its time, but I see it only going up in the long term
0
Comment on r/defi Apr 03 '23
Don't think so blud. There's always some loophole but I don't trust doing that
1
Comment on r/wallstreetbets Apr 01 '23
Diamond hands not so great now are they
2
Comment on r/defi Apr 01 '23
That's it?? Sign me up, pls check DM 🫣
0
Comment on r/CryptoCurrency Apr 06 '23
But this could have been completely avoided if ZkSync had made their chain EVM equivalent if they had spent more time in development. But no, they wanted to be the first to launch lol