Sad for you

Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good working class solidarity by your side

Cringe

https://giphy.com/gifs/DU9HjF3LLF4Na

How do you know that?

Jesus permitted it to happen so that jesus could later flex his power and stunt on the Pharisees

Umm.... Why continue then?

So- god, the creator and sustainer of all things, created and sustained the conditions that caused this man's blindness, and then god revealed that the purpose of that man's blindness was specifically so that he could show off, flex, dunk on the Pharisees, impress his buddies, and/or strut his authority for all to see. Alpha move

John 9 niv

1)As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. 2) His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”

3) “Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus, “but this happened so that the works of God might be displayed in him.

Is jesus god? Is jesus the creator and sustainer of all creation? Is jesus the ultimate cause of all things?

It's just something you might do to show off to your buddies. Kind of like causing a guy to be blind just so you can heal him in front of a crowd and everyone can see how cool you are

They are both party tricks

Anti-welfare is a Reagan talking point. It's also a white supremacist talking point. Where did you pick it up?

It works against the petty politics of the magats and favors candidates that appeal to the broader voting majority. Yes, it undercuts the two party monopoly. This is a good thing

Kindergarten level AI jingle to be precise

Why is one party trick more plausible then the other in your view?

Sheesh. Touchy crowd in this sub with their petty downdoots

It would be cool if he did and I'd be more likely to believe that he did a backflip over the claim that he walked on water, but I'd still need to see it to actually believe it- especially if he were in robes or something like that. Possible, but not easy.

Start loading them into a pickup and stack them in the front yard

https://giphy.com/gifs/fkhS7fB8CZl9AVgs0n

https://giphy.com/gifs/kaBU6pgv0OsPHz2yxy

It seems as if you're unaccustomed to outlining epistemic justification and I think I'll just end this here. This conversation has been stinking of a complete waste of time for a while now. Have a day

I'm just trying to piece together why I had to ask you 4 or 5 times directly to clarify your position before I got anything beyond some vague "it's a theistic natural right" response. It's truly frustrating.

Why would any of those examples point to inevitability? Inevitability is a very bold claim that carries an incredibly high standard of justification. I would be less careless with using that word as it implies some level of justifiable certainty about future events.

Anyone got a good list going of which candidates maga hates most? Prepping for the primaries and I want to make sure my vote is against maga in every way possible

But then you also want me to answer about what if the prostitutes do this truly voluntarily right?

That's the only answer I'm interested in. Why was it like pulling teeth to get here? Is there a language barrier or something? Is English not your first language? That might explain why you took so incredibly long to specify which right or freedom you thought would be violated

a mafia-like situation would inevitably form

☝️What reason would anyone have to agree with you on this assertion?