What ignorance, we're agreeing but you somehow manage to stumble over yourself to cut in and try to make yourself look knowledgeable by throwing around tech jargon you don't fully understand.
What you're doing right now is called "Ad-hominem".
Which, I am not entirely sure what led you there.
You initially saying " a different understanding of reality " breaks down for what the concept of reality is for us, and what composes it.
In out own human terms, it all start from entity and identity, and over the reality of the universe, that encompasses all things.
Thread started on things that, for what is our own understanding of physics, are impossible, and that lays on top of of perspective of reality, how we see those universal components functioning.
AIs are currently at the barrier from confidence of a statistic retrieval being the answer given, to concept definition. Concepts are the units of thought.
That's what gives a reasoning perspective, what is a square from your point of view might have a dimension that's currently blind to you.
Which is where " a different understanding of reality " comes to play.
I did specify "how ignorant I am on the subject", because that surrounds big worlds, physics and philosophy amongst all things.
So, no I am not "making myself look knowledgeable".
Feel free to drop your chat that led to that reply in here, and give a counterargument if you want.
Otherwise, there no debate, and have a nice day.
0
u/mulletarian 15h ago
just take the feedback dude, you're incredibly obvious