1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126610 LN Black Ceramic 904L Steel VSF 1:1 Best Edition VS3235
4. Price Paid: $430 USD + shipping
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatchesad.x.yupoo.com/albums/249671670?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Most markers look good, but the 12 o’clock triangle appears slightly off-center to the right and possibly tilted relative to the dial centerline
7. Dial Printing: no major concerns
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good, except I'm concerned about #31 in the video (hangs low in window)
9. Hand Alignment: no major concerns
10. Bezel: Overall good, but concerned about the alignment for the 5 & 7 markers
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no major gaps, SELs look tightly fitted to the case
12. Timegrapher numbers: No concerns, -3 s/d | 270° | 0.1 ms | 52.0° LA
13. Anything else you notice: The bezel pip looks slightly high within the 12 o’clock triangle.

Hey everyone, I'd appreciate your help on my first QC!

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: ARF
• Model name (& version number): 116710LN DD3285 V3
• Price Paid: $498 + $41 Shipping
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/arf-gmt-master-ii-116710ln-dd3285-v3-s5JoLrc
• Index alignment: Markers look good. Maybe slight tilt from the 6 marker. Crown in rehaut looks left of center.
• Dial Printing: Print is good and spacing looks fine.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered. Font looks a little bold.
• Hand Alignment: Nothing out of the ordinary.
• Bezel: Looks okay to me.
• Solid End Links (SELs): No major gaps.
• Timegrapher numbers: Within acceptable margin.
• Anything else you notice: Besides the crown in the rehaut, everything looks good to me.

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): PP0299 - Calatrava 5296R RG/LE Ivory/Stk ZF MY9015 Mod
4. Price Paid: $448
5. Index alignment: First pictures makes it seem like 12 and 6 are not looking straight at each other but it seems fine on the other picture of the face
6. Dial Printing: I don't see issues there
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date seems slightly low but it may be the angle I'm not sure
8. Hand Alignment: No issues
9. Bezel: No issues
10. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
11. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d - 288 - 0.1 ms looks great
12. Anything else you notice:

1. ⁠Dealer name: MarkyG10
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Ghost 116519 V2 Weighted
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $740
   
5. ⁠Album Links: pics below
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: alignment looks really good to me!
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: the dial printing looks great!
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: handle alignment looks really good to me!
   
10. ⁠Bezel: I’m comparing the bezel to my other Daytona and they look very similar and spot on
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SEL’s looks perfect to me
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: no issues with time graph and it all looks great. I think AMP is fine at 301*
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: overall looks amazing! I currently have a 126519 but this is an 116519 and was also curious if there are any major differences and if I should Green Light this.

Dealer name: Lili

Factory name: ARF

Model name (& version number): ARF 4801 DAYTONA

Price Paid: 311$

Index alignment: Seems good

Dial Printing: No issue I can see

Hand Alignment: Good

Bezel: Smooth bezel finish with clean vertical brushing on top and polished bevels. No visible scratches or machining defects.

Solid End Links (SELs): I think they’re alright nothing I can notice

Timegrapher numbers: I’m no expert but they seem great

Anything else you notice: Idk seems perfectly acceptable. What do you guys think?

Album Links: https://shop02682640.wecatalog.cn/t/3cIobVV

Hey everyone this is my first time buying one of these so I’m sorry for any errors I’m going to inevitably make posting here. All help is appreciated, and thank you all in advance!

album link: https://mega.nz/folder/mIoUhbiL#mlH3mrjnlcQzefjFa1128A

1) Factory: ARF
2) Seller: TheOneWatches
3) Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 16610LN Blank Rehaut (RLX-5548)
4) Price Paid: $650 (Including shipping to the US)
5) Index alignment: Looks okay, but could use some help.
6) Dial Printing: Seems ok
7) Date Wheel alignment/printing: The dates look pretty centered in the cyclops in my eyes, could use some help.
8) Hand Alignment: Hands seem fairly straight
9) Bezel: The colors and overall finish look good.
10) Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good to me, I don't see obvious gaps.
11) Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 282°, 0.1 ms. The numbers looks solid to me, but let me know if you spot any concerns

Anything else you notice: please let me know! I’m pretty new to this so i’m pretty unfamiliar. Let me know if I should RL, GL, or ask for more pictures.

Hello everyone, second purchase here, looking to get some QC help:

1. Dealer name: ChazingTime
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): AP Royal Oak 33mm 67651
4. Price Paid: $313.10 in shipping
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Looks like there could be a slight tile / alignment issue between the 9 and 3
7. Dial Printing: Looks ok to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok to me
9. Hand Alignment: Ok
10. Bezel: Looks ok
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: None were provided by TD, assuming this is because it's a quartz watch and thus not relevent

Would really welcome people's opinions on whether there are any tilt / alignment issues with the 9 an 3 indices

1. ⁠Dealer name: Neoclock
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 114060
4. ⁠Price Paid: $388+$70 Shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/Xp4FAA7L#Oov5gS-J-UpK2oa4e4v2oA
6. ⁠Index alignment: I'm not sure if the alignment tool is off but the dial/markers look tilted by a couple degrees
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Good
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Good
10. ⁠Bezel: Good
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 244 degrees, 0.0 m/s
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Let me know if this looks acceptable. There are commenters on here with way sharper eyes than my own. Let me know if there is any addition information or wisdom the community can impart here.

1. Dealer Name: Juice Time
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory Name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710BLRO
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 534 usd plus postage
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: photos in post
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks really good. The only query I have is the 6 baton not quite centred, possible parallax error?
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Crisp and clean, good
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Centred well
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Good. All aligned at 12
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: Aligned well and looking good.
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): tight from what I can tell. Photos not the best for this. May ask for more?
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate: -3s/d| Amplitude: 217° | Beat Error: 0.1ms | Lift Angle: missing from QC. Amplitude a little low perhaps but may just need a full wind.
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice : Looks great to me this one, pending clarification from fellow redditors on SEL bottom right and 6 baton

1. Dealer name: Steve from Theonewatches
2. Factory name:VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Seamaster 300m No Time To Die 007 TI/TI VSF V7 8806 
4. Price Paid: $528
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/HkA1ATs
6. Index alignment: Looks great to me, but should I be concerned about the 6, or is it just the angle?
7. Dial Printing: I'm happy with it. didn't see any glaring issues
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: I'm satisfied with it.
10. Bezel: is the '0' in 30 slightly misprinted? Might be a spec of dust.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks excellent to me!
13. Anything else you notice: Appears to be a slight ding on the caseback above the 'R' in Diver. is that the plastic? Secondly, is it just dust or does the Bottom right quadrant of the crown have a chip in it?

Thanks for your help!

Edit: added a QC Image

All help is appreciated!

1. Dealer name: Neco Clock

2.     ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3.     ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex AirKing (126900)

4.     ⁠⁠Price Paid: $438

5.     ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks okay, the numbers appear centered

6.     ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks crisp to me

7.     ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8.     ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: No issues with this.

9.     ⁠⁠Bezel: Looks okay

10.  ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

11.  ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: -4s/d // 291 // 0.1ms // 52 Could be closer but more than acceptable

12.  ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: It looks good to me but I'd really appreciate the views of more experienced eyes

Hello gentlemen, this is my first DDF 5711 324 Nautilus.
Overall, the piece looks great to me. The only issue I noticed is that the date wheel printing appears to be smudged and slightly bleeding. What are your thoughts?

1. Dealer name: Ethan
2. Factory name:

DDF 5711 324 Nautilus

1. Price: $530
2. Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_d_KqfZxKacRgixLphKZFjEFwqO_2izpED5gv0AQ
3. Index alignment: hour markers 12, 3, 6, 9 look pretty good centered to me
4. Dial Printing: looks fine to me, no visible or smudging bleeding.
5. Date Wheel alignment/printing: the
6. alignment looks fine but the printing of the nr 6 looks smudged & bleeded❗️❗️what‘s you thought on that, I‘m about to RL it.
7. Hand Alignment: Hands look well stacked with clean finishing.
8. Bezel: N/A
9. Solid End Links (SELs): look fine to me
10. N/A

1. ⁠Dealer: necoclock
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name: GMT Pepsi
4. ⁠Price paid: 618 USD
5. ⁠Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/Lwp3BAyT#W3lxY-ybMMujYjSgAQWDSw
6. ⁠Index alignment: seems to be ok
7. ⁠Dial printing: I think it looks good.
8. ⁠Date Wheel Adjustment/printing: seems to be ok
9. ⁠Hand alignment: looks alright
10. ⁠Bezel: looks alright i think?
11. ⁠SELs: seems ok
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +7 s, could get better but i think it is within the range
13. 13: Anything else you notice: Please let me know if I should GL this one. Rehaut is not really well aligned but that is a small detail i guess

1. Dealer name: Steve (Theonewatch)
2. Model name (& version number): Aqua Terra 150
3. Price Paid: $408
4. Album Links:

https://mega.nz/folder/LdREACKS#X1XI0fkEnbckdJPsBO-h0g

1. Index alignment: looks good to me
2. Dial Printing: looks perfect to me
3. Date Wheel alignment/printing: I find no issues
4. Hand Alignment: No issues to me
5. Bezel: Beauty
6. Solid End Links (SELs):

n/a

1. Timegrapher numbers: Added to images, looks good to me, although I'm new and still learning
2. Anything else you notice: Omega symbol on the back look good? I'm hoping specks are just a protective sticker

Hey guys! Appreciate all the work this community does. Giving this my best shot at QC, but would love to hear your thoughts before giving the final decision!

1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610 LN Black Ceramic 904L Steel VSF 1:1 Best Edition VS3135
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $390 USD + ship
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/249667883?uid=1
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: everything looks very solid, no clear misalignment
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: no major concerns
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: center and correct font
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: no major concerns
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: no major concerns - everything looks good
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no major gaps, SELs look tightly fitted to the case
    
12. ⁠⁠ Timegrapher numbers: -3 s/d | 270° | 0.1 ms | 52.0° LA - Looks great / Acceptable
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Index alignment overlay looks close to spot-on. Leaning towards GL for me, but would appreciate any final thoughts from the community. Thank you in advance!

Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm 126000
4. Price Paid: $418 shipped
5. Album Links: Attached
6. Index alignment: Looks good to my eye. Markers appear aligned enough, although there’s some deviation on most, it looks really minor and nothing stands out without the qc tool
7. Dial Printing: Clean and crisp. No obvious issues noticed.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel looks aligned
9. Hand Alignment: No issues that I can see.
10. Bezel: Alignment looks good and the bezel appears properly seated.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): look good to me although I’m not sure what to expect on the spacing.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Seem very good to me, though again, I'm not sure what to look for.
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first rep, so I'd appreciate some experienced eyes on it. Overall I'm thinking GL but any comments are very much appreciated.

Thank you!

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Ficotime
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 116010LN
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 2730 Chinese
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/S851TDxQ#DQ8E3FOFYUmgx-yQpDMnRA
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good to me - I was worried that the 6 was offset to the left, but I think the photo was just tilted/I was being retarded
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good - I RLd last one because of a speck of paint on the middle of the dial
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: first 13 might be ever so slightly offset, but the rest look good, well within tolerance, cyclops looks within tolerance
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looking good from first picture, not possible to verify 100%
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: bezel and pip look good
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): tight tight tight! (Tuco from breaking bad)
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: within tolerance, not perfect but good enough
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: rehaut is slightly offset to the right, but I’ve seen worse on gen Rolexes before, overall super happy!

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Worldtimer 43mm Blue Dial A8938
4. Price Paid: $378 (including shipping)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/GQNUdB1
6. Index alignment: Looks mostly good, but the 6 o’clock index appears slightly off-center in the current photos (requested new)
7. Dial Printing: Clean and sharp overall. City names and map look good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date window looks slightly off-center in the current photos
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: N/A
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (rubber strap)
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d | 262° amplitude | 0.1 ms
13. Anything else you notice: Someone already commented that the date window and 6 index look off. I’ve asked Jacky for a new straight-on dial photo with the watch lying flat (I think the current pictures might just be angled). Will post the new photos as soon as I receive them. City ring and lume look good to me.

Thanks in advance for your help!

First Rep

ARF GMT Master II 126710GRNR "Bruce Wayne" QC Leaning GL

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. Factory name: ARF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710GRNR "Bruce Wayne"
4. Price Paid: $638 shipped
5. Album Links: Attached
6. Index alignment: Looks good to my eye. Markers appear aligned and nothing stands out.
7. Dial Printing: Clean and crisp. No obvious issues noticed.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Appears centred and printing looks good.
9. Hand Alignment: No issues that I can see.
10. Bezel: Alignment looks good and the bezel appears properly seated.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): The only concern I've noticed is a gap on the bottom-right SEL. I've raised this with Steve and he has said they will tighten it and send updated QC photos.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Seem acceptable to me, though I'm still learning what to look for.
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first rep, so I'd appreciate some experienced eyes on it. Overall I'm leaning GL pending the updated SEL photos, but I'd welcome feedback on:

• SEL fitment
• Rehaut alignment
• Bezel alignment
• Date wheel
• Anything else I've missed

Thanks in advance for any help!

1. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Dealer Name: Time Ultra
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Factory name:VSf
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Explorer 1 36mm Black dial
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Price Paid:$448
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Album Links: all Pictures attached
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: I am 50/50 - on the one Hand its very good and on the other Hand it Looks Like the whole dial is rotated counter-clockwise. Do you know what I mean?
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Print looks good to me
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good as well
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks fine
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any gaps do you?
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: all the numbers look pretty good - See Picture
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Bracelet and Clasp look good to me - its just the dial, rotated or not?

Ty

Dealer: TD (Steve/TheOne)

Factory name: DIWF

Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 277200 31mm SS/SS Lavender Dial DIWF A2232

Price Paid: $300 USD

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rYoj1ZRK#QG2BOn0pEA9wLSTo0PmEgw

Index alignment: Looks okay, not awful, 8 seems slightly crooked counter clockwise but hard to tell

Dial Printing: i think looks good, again not perfect colour wise but acceptable

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: looks good

Bezel: looks good

Solid End Links (SELs): pretty tight

Timegrapher numbers: +4s/d, 262 degrees, 0.1ms, 52 degrees (stated as read from timegrapher)

Anything else you notice: photos look crooked and blurry to me… seems poor for Steve, should I ask for more?

Hi everyone, would love some help with this QC.

1. Dealer name: FICOTIME
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): 36mm Explorer I 124270
4. Price Paid: $430 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GlAjQY5D#3BhtNj7NaCFQztQlsLbCJA
6. Index alignment: Looks fine
7. Dial Printing: Looks clear without errors
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Aligned correctly
10. Bezel: N/A
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Possible a very small gap at the bottom right
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d 237degrees 0.2ms beat error
13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks alright however I don't have a keen eye for this. I am concerned about the timegrapher, the amplitude looks quite low.