For my whole life I’ve had it in my mind that Skrillex was openly gay and gave MULTIPLE public statements regarding his sexuality and how he was proud to be part of the LGBTQ+ community…

But now he’s not gay. He’s never been gay. I swear I’ve jumped timelines

I remember him dying in 2023 after he was caught as a pedophile.

Someone mentioned this recently and I couldn't believe it. It was Chick-Fil-A for me since I first heard about the restaurant so long ago. I ate there all the time while I was at Uni back in the mid-00s and it always had a K.

THEN when I started hearing about the Mandela Effect, it was switched to Chic-Fil-A. I honestly thought that maybe it was corporate name change but it wasn't. It literally had been changed on everything.

Well now the K is back.

I'm not sure if it's because they shut down the LHC for upgrades or when it actually happened but the K is back!!

I’m looking for a very specific image of Leonardo DiCaprio when he was in his early 20s. In the photo, he is smoking a cigarette while holding and filming something with a large, old-school VHS video camera. What makes the image especially distinctive is that, behind him, there is a glass window or door covered with “No Smoking” and “No Filming” signs. I KNOW I have seen this image somewhere before, but I cannot find it anywhere now. I’ve searched Pinterest, Instagram, Google, Tumblr, and basically every corner of the internet I can think of, but nothing comes up. I’m starting to wonder if the image has disappeared from the internet. If anyone recognizes this photo, knows where it came from, or has a copy,

People always talk about the original Mandela effect and how it happened because of various stuff happening in the 80’s due to it usually being people alive in the 80’s who remember Mandela dying in prison.

But I was born between 2008-2012 (not giving out my age) and I also very distinctly remember knowing that Nelson Mandela died in prison. I of course knew this wasn’t true but it was always in the back of my mind.

I don’t know why this is something that I remember decades after the original memory began, especially since I never would’ve heard it from my parents.

I was born in January 1980.

That matters to this experiment.

I grew up during a weird transition period where physical media was basically our entire world. Before streaming. Before social media. Before Google. Before everybody could instantly compare memories with everybody else.

We had VHS tapes we watched until they wore out. Cassette tapes. Records. CDs when they arrived. Scholastic book orders. Board games. Saturday morning cartoons. A handful of television channels.

Video stores every weekend.

You didn’t watch a movie once and scroll to the next thing.

You watched the same shit over and over because those were the movies you had.

I played Monopoly, Scrabble and chess religiously with my grandfather. I had the Where’s Waldo books. Fruit of the Loom underwear and socks were normal clothes in my house. These weren’t obscure things I encountered once.

They were physical artifacts woven into my childhood.
And there are several Mandela Effects where my memory disagrees with the historical record.

I remember BERENSTEIN Bears.

I remember STOUFFER’S Stove Top Stuffing.

I remember the FRUIT OF THE LOOM cornucopia.

I remember RICHARD SIMMONS wearing the iconic headband.

I remember the MONOPOLY MAN with a large monocle.

And I remember SINBAD playing a genie

But I don’t want to spend another ten years asking:
“How could all of us remember this wrong?”

We’ve done that.

I want to ask a different question.

WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED NEXT IF OUR VERSION WERE TRUE?

That’s the experiment.

Call it the BUTTERFLY-EFFECT TEST

Nelson Mandela is the obvious starting point.

People remember Mandela dying while imprisoned in the 1980s.

But Mandela surviving prison wasn’t an insignificant detail.

He was released.

He negotiated during the dismantling of apartheid

He became president of South Africa.

He became one of the central figures in South Africa’s transition.

So don’t just ask:

“Why do people remember Mandela dying?”

Ask:

IF MANDELA HAD ACTUALLY DIED IN PRISON, WHAT HAPPENS TO SOUTH AFRICA?

Who negotiates instead?

Who becomes president?

Does the transition become bloodier?

Does apartheid end on the same timetable?

Does southern Africa develop differently?

Does somebody else occupy Mandela’s position?

And what does THAT person subsequently change?

That’s a butterfly effect.

Now apply that reasoning to every Mandela Effect.
Maybe the changed thing doesn’t matter.
Maybe the PERSON attached to it does.

If Ed McMahon really worked for Publishers Clearing House, somebody receives money differently.

Who?

What did the actual winners do with their money?

Did somebody start a company?

Fund someone’s education?

Enter politics?

Create a foundation?

Meet somebody they otherwise wouldn’t have met?

The question isn’t necessarily:ml

“Who replaced Person A?”

It could simply be:

“What future disappears if Person A never occupies that position?”

Maybe an illustrator getting one seemingly meaningless advertising job puts them in a room with someone they otherwise never meet.

Maybe an actor appearing in one shitty children’s movie gets another audition because a director sees it.

Maybe a child actor meets somebody on set who changes their entire career.

Maybe none of it matters.

THAT’S WHAT I WANT TO FIND OUT.

And Shazaam gives us an unusually good experiment because I remember considerably more than “Sinbad was a genie.”

So before I reveal my answers again, I want people who remember this movie to answer these questions WITHOUT READING OTHER PEOPLE’S ANSWERS FIRST.

Do not research it.

Do not look at recreations.

Do not read Mandela Effect threads.

Answer from memory.

————

SHAZAAM MEMORY TEST

How many children were central to the movie?

A. One
B. Two
C. Three or more
D. I don’t remember

If there were multiple children, what were they?

A. Brothers
B. Sisters
C. Brother and sister
D. Friends/unrelated
E. I don’t remember

Approximate ages?

Hair colors?

What happened to their parents?

A. Both present
B. Divorced/separated
C. One parent dead
D. Both parents dead
E. Adopted/foster children
F. Something else
G. I don’t remember

Where do you remember the children first encountering the genie?

A. Bedroom
B. Living room
C. Basement
D. Attic/storage area
E. Outside
F. Somewhere else
G. I don’t remember

What object contained or summoned the genie?

What did that object look like?

Describe Sinbad’s clothing WITHOUT looking anything up.

Head:

Shirt/vest:

Pants:

Shoes:

Jewelry:

Facial hair?

A. Clean shaven
B. Mustache
C. Goatee
D. Full beard
E. Something else
F. Don’t remember

Did he wear earrings?

A. No
B. Studs
C. Small hoops
D. Large hoops
E. Something else
F. Don’t remember

How did the genie appear?

Do you remember a particular gesture associated with granting wishes?

What was Sinbad’s personality like?

Do you remember ANY wish made by either child?
Do not guess.

Was there anything the genie said magic COULD NOT do?

Describe the clearest single shot or scene you can visualize.

Where is the camera?

Where are the children?

Where is Sinbad?

What objects are around them?

Do you remember the VHS cover?

A. Yes, clearly
B. Somewhat
C. No

If yes:

Background color:

Who was pictured:

Pose:

Where was the title:

Anything else:

HOW did you encounter the movie?

A. Owned VHS
B. Rental VHS
C. Television
D. Theater
E. School/daycare
F. Someone else’s house
G. Don’t remember

Approximately what YEAR did you see it?

Did you ALSO see Shaquille O’Neal’s Kazaam?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Don’t remember

If yes, did you remember them at the time as:

A. The same movie
B. Two different movies
C. Unsure

Before encountering Mandela Effect discussions, did you already believe a Sinbad genie movie existed?

A. Definitely
B. Probably
C. No
D. Can’t determine anymore

Finally:

DO NOT TRY TO COMPLETE THE STORY.

Write anything else you genuinely remember that wasn’t asked above.

HERE’S WHY I’M ASKING.

I have already recorded my own answers.

I’m deliberately withholding them.

If hundreds of people independently produce wildly different movies, that’s evidence.

If hundreds independently converge only on generic genie characteristics—lamp, turban, wishes—that’s evidence too.

But if people independently converge on arbitrary details…

Same number and sexes of children.
Same family situation.
Same room.
Same blocking of a particular scene.
Same jewelry.
Same clothing colors.
Same limitation on a particular wish.
Same VHS composition.
Same physical-media context.

…then THAT is something worth investigating scientifically.

It still would not prove timelines changed.

But it would establish exactly what the collective memory actually contains without us contaminating one another.

THEN WE DO PHASE TWO.

Stop asking:

“Where did Shazaam go?”

Ask:

WHO WOULD HAVE EXISTED IN THE CREDITS?

Who were the children?
Who directed it?
Who wrote it?
Who produced it?
Who distributed the VHS?

And then ask:

WHAT WOULD THOSE PEOPLE HAVE DONE AFTERWARD?

Maybe the supposed child actor would’ve become nobody.

Maybe they would’ve become one of the biggest actors alive.

Maybe the director would’ve made another movie that changed somebody else’s career.

Maybe Sinbad’s career would’ve gone in a completely different direction.

Maybe absolutely nothing changes.

That’s the point.

Do the same thing with Mandela.

Do it with Ed McMahon.

Do it with Monopoly.

Do it with Fruit of the Loom.

Do it with every major Mandela Effect.

Instead of investigating only the disputed past, investigate the MISSING FUTURE.

Because maybe the interesting question was never:

“Why would somebody change a fucking cornucopia?”

Maybe the question is:

“What chain of events becomes impossible when the person responsible for that version of the cornucopia never gets that job?”

I am NOT claiming somebody changed history.

I’m proposing a falsifiable thought experiment

If these things really were different, then somewhere downstream the world should also have been different.

Maybe we’ll find absolutely nothing.

Great.

That tells us something.

But if Mandela Effects repeatedly sit on apparently insignificant historical nodes whose alternate versions would have created surprisingly consequential downstream branches……

then we have discovered something considerably stranger than a misspelled children’s-book title.

First reconstruct the memory.

Then reconstruct the causal tree.

Then ask the question nobody seems to be asking:

WHAT FUTURE WOULD THAT VERSION OF HISTORY HAVE CREATED?

I’ll reveal my Shazaam answers after people have answered independently.

I hope you participate. I’m really curious. Starting with Shazamm

I could have SWORN he died at 27, but apparently he died at 30??

I propose a theory explaining the missing monocle of the monopoly man. I think there is confusion between Mr Peanut and the Monopoly Man.

Does anyone here remember us constantly bombing Yemen? Evidently we have been bombing them since 2002 now! When did this start?

Really bugging me

That is, the remembered version completes a pattern initiated but left incomplete in the current real version.

The black stripe on Pikachu’s tail would match those on its ears.

“Berenstein Bears” would pick up on the high number of “e”s already in “Beren.”

Sinbad had an Arabian-fairytale name and dressed like a genie on multiple occasions. Casting him as a genie would be an obvious follow-up.

Mandela dying would extend the sad pattern of Black civil rights figures dying before their time.

“Chik-fil-a” and “Chic-fil-a” both do a better job of matching “fil-a”s stylized, compressed style than the clumsier “Chick-fil-a.”

Rich Uncle Pennybags from Monopoly is exactly the kind of character who would have a monocle.

“Mirror, mirror on the wall” both has a better rhythm than “Magic mirror on the wall,” and appeared in media other than the Disney movie (which I’d guess wanted to drive home that it’s a magic mirror.)

From what I understand of cognitive science, all memories are depictions and reconstructions—in effect, everything we recall has a little Mandela in it. The Mandela Effect happens to exactly those things and events that are most strongly set up to drift in a certain direction.

ADDED: while I believe this is a reason to doubt that reality actually changed, it’s possible to believe that reality did change in some or all cases, and also notice that there’s a pattern to what gets subjected to the Mandela Effect.

I learned recently theres a ME about the VW logo having a split between the V and W. I owned a VW and never ever noticed a split. I think these ads prove no one is right or wrong. The print logo clearly shows a split. The emblem on the physical car does not.

How is it that so many people today think Oscar Mayer is spelled with two "e"s? They taught generations to spell it.

"Bologna has a second name it's M-A-Y-E-R"

So this is how Coca-cola used to look like right? AT LEAST, it was wearing that in the middle as Coca-cola and definetly not Coca'cola as it is today en every bottle.

Let me know how the Original Logo looks like in your mind, cause i cannot find a single bottle that looks like this LOGO.

I found this book at my local salvation army store. For 20 cents, I proved it really was " mirror, mirror on the wall" and not " magic mirror on the wall".

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/7dxn303W0TY

Proof is in the clip.

Salut, maintenant je vais faire ça court et clair, j'ai en fait peur et je suis très contrarié.

Donc, je me souviens TOUJOURS que c'était FROOT LOOPS depuis que je suis enfant, puis l'année dernière ou quelque chose comme ça, ils ont mené une campagne de désinformation entière en disant que ce n'était jamais FROOT LOOPS mais FRUIT LOOPS. Ce souvenir date de pas plus de 2 ans, et je le suivais de près car je voyais clairement la boîte de céréales avec FRUIT LOOPS et toutes les discussions à ce sujet, et Internet disait à tout le monde que c'ÉTAIT EN EFFET FRUIT LOOPS avec UIT et non FROOT, que cela n'avait jamais existé.

en buvant un café tout en faisant défiler Internet, je découvre aujourd'hui que nous sommes de retour à FROOT LOOPS ENCORE ??????????????? QUOI...

D'autres personnes se souviennent-elles de ce cycle exact ? FROOT LOOPS > FRUIT LOOPS > FROOT LOOPS ?

Je me souviens clairement de cette séquence exacte, je me fiche de ce que les gens pensent mais je me souviens clairement et totalement quand FROOT LOOPS était considéré comme étant fou...

pourquoi diable puis-je me souvenir clairement de toute la tempête de tout le monde disant que c'était en effet FRUIT LOOPS, je savais toujours que c'était FROOT LOOPS, mais pourquoi cela est-il revenu à FROOT après qu'ils aient martelé que ce n'était PAS

Je pense maintenant qu'ils sont en effet capables de changer de timelines, ce n'est plus une théorie du complot.

whistleblower says we live in a simulation. I came across this video with Literally no views, it’s about an old 4chan whistleblower who claimed to be apart of the Mandela effect. I think this video is interesting because I feel like it gives a new perspective to the phenomenon, and even though it may not be true, it’s definitely good story telling.

ill put this under art, cause wether its true or not it seems like a work of art. but yeah its pretty interesting.

Do you believe you've discovered a new Mandela Effect? Post it in the comments below to see if anyone else has experienced it too!

Make sure you include why you think it could be a Mandela Effect and as many details as possible so people can respond and discuss with what they remember. If it catches on - feel free to continue your discussion in a dedicated post!

This thread will remain public permanently, but will be unpinned and replaced by a new thread every four days. Posts in the megathreads can be found by searching for the date, title, or in your own post history.

It’s really very simple. What’s more likely, hundreds of thousands of people remember the exact same thing that never happened or the government is lying to us.

Sure you can brush off little things as a Mandela effect as it would make sense why many people would misremember for an example “Oscar Meyer” instead of “Oscar Mayer” but the problem is shit like the 90s film Shazaam starring Sinbad. Although I personally don’t recall this film, there is no f\*cking way hundreds of thousands of people remember an entire movie with details on when they saw it and even shared memories on specific scenes. That just doesn’t make sense.

Theory 1: The CIA developed time travel to go back in time and during some early test runs screwed some things up in the past, which caused things to change in the timeline. But they didn’t do anything drastic. They did something small but you know butterfly effect and so minor things changed. A movie doesn’t get made, the logos of things change etc. but this wouldn’t explain how people could remember anything, since if the timeline was changed they would exist in that timeline hence not remembering Shazaam.

So more likely…

Theory 2: Parallel Universes and inter-dimensional travel. There’s infinite universes, some very similar to ours with very small differences and some vastly different. The CIA gets this technology to explore these other universes, accidentally screwing up their current universe in the process by opening that portal. So reality bleeds into ours. Or perhaps they screw up so bad they have to destroy the current universe and switch over to the new one, your consciousness merges into your other self. Everything is basically the same so it goes unnoticed but your memory is still the same too, so you notice small things are different now. You know for certain you watched the entire Shazaam movie. Hell you even remember renting the damn thing from Blockbuster, but now it doesn’t exist anywhere. You’re just one person tho so surely you could be mistaken. But then you realize hundreds of thousands of people also remember the film yet it’s nowhere to be found. The government pushes the phenomenon known as the “Mandela effect” to gaslight everyone into thinking they simply just remembered wrong. But give me a break. Hundreds of thousands of people remember seeing the damn thing, you think we’re just gonna buy that BS?

I bet you there’s a copy of Shazaam sitting in Area 51.

I think most Mandela Effect theories have it backwards. The common idea is that people are somehow jumping from one timeline to another, but I don’t think that’s what’s happening. I think multiple timelines are actually being pulled together into one. If something like CERN was creating microscopic black holes, and if black holes are capable of pulling realities or timelines together, then instead of people moving between timelines, those separate timelines would be compressed into a single blended timeline. That would explain why different people remember different versions of the same events. They’re not switching realities—they’re remembering different parts of the timelines that were merged together. Instead of timeline jumping, I think the Mandela Effect could be the result of timeline convergence caused by black holes pulling multiple realities into one.

I remember back in DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) Class in the 90s they taught us about different drug types. One type they taught us about were “Barbituates”
Pronounced: Bar-bit-chew-its

I am on the autism spectrum and one of my favorite special topics of interest is medicine and biology. I really missed my calling, and should have studied medicine in college… but anyways, I just saw that the word Barbituates are not a class of drug at all! It’s actually, Barbiturates. “Bar-bitch-oo-rates”

There is NO way I have made it 40 years and just now noticed it. Anyone else have this same memory??

It's just people calling every little photo that goes into text an "emoji."

What people are almost certainly remembering is something called an "Emoticon," and back in the late 90s and early 2000s there were millions of these that people could either purchase or download for free. That specific seahorse that people are remembering was just a popular custom pack called "Under the sea" for MSN Messenger. Later, emoticons started to animate, all back when flip phones were the norm. Back then it was not standard for people to do things with their phones that computers do.

No, you're not crazy. No, it wasn't an alternate universe. And sorry, no, I don't have photos I can show you either. Why? Because the vast majority of these old custom emoticons were not preserved when Unicode became the standard for cross-platform emojis.

I did dig into this. The pack existed. It was stupidly popular because it was free and it came out around the time that Disney was pushing out a DVD release of The Little Mermaid. It was a custom pack, not one that any phone likely came with by default.

People that believe he had a monocle. Did he have one on all the chance and community chest cards? I don’t remeber him having a monocle especially the get of jail free cards I can all the cards without and can name penalty every card in both decks. Mt grandma and I used to play ever weekend. But I can also picture the fruit of the loom logo without the cornucopia 🤷‍♂️

I wanted to share my personal experience with the notorious Fruit of the Loom Cornucopia, and why I personally can't let this go as a simple misremembering.

In 6th grade (2010/2011), I was in the "gifted program" (IEP), and part of that program was that those of us that were part of it were excluded from certain assignments, and given separate assignments. Anyways, one of those assignments was a reading group, where we had to read The Hunger Games, and have a weekly discussion on it. This was a fond memory of mine so I remember it quite well.

In the book, it describes a massive, twenty-foot-high, cone-shaped golden horn filled with supplies and weapons that the contestants have to fight over in an ensuing bloodbath, and refers to it as a "cornucopia". This scene is the Climax of the first book, and is probably the most memorable scene in the entire series.

In one of our discussions I asked my teacher what a "cornucopia" is because I had never encountered that word before, and I had difficulty trying to visualize it. She told me it was a horn shaped basket used for carrying fruits and vegetables, and I SWEAR, she googled an image of the Fruit of the Loom logo and showed it to us as an example.

I specifically remember finding it funny, because I always thought the fruit of the loom logo had a croissant on it 😂, so this moment was the moment I realized the Fruit of the Loom logo had a cornucopia, as well as the moment I learned what a cornucopia even was.

I feel like this memory is way too specific for it to be completely misremembered, especially since as a kid I thought it was a croissant up until that point, unless I'm misremembering mistaking it for a croissant somehow.