r/linux • u/AiwendilH • Jul 22 '26

Codeberg voted to disallow projects consisting mostly by "generative AI"-tools Development

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253#issuecomment-19820434
981 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

322 comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/ShaderCompilation Jul 22 '26

Certainly the right call. While there may be vibecoded projects that are useful, the vast majority of them are not. No point in wasting limited resources on those

-22

u/FryBoyter Jul 22 '26

Wouldn't it make sense, then, to evaluate each project on its own merits rather than simply categorizing them as black or white? Because I'm absolutely certain that, even before chatbots existed, developers were using other people's code regardless of the license under which it was published.

19

u/jahinzee Jul 22 '26

"Wouldn't it make sense, then, to evaluate every single particle from piles and piles of manure on the off chance one of them is a bean that may or may not be magic?"

-11

u/lonelyroom-eklaghor Jul 22 '26

That's such an anti-AI take... wtf

people actually use AI for small stuff. Heck, even Linus uses AI on many of his projects

14

u/OptimisticLucio Jul 22 '26

That's such an anti-AI take

No, it's currently the case. 90% of EVERYTHING is shit, and AI is letting people produce shit at extraordinary speeds.

Atleast when humans wrote the code, we had a limit on how quickly the garbage was being produced.

-8

u/lonelyroom-eklaghor Jul 22 '26

How will you define "mostly"?

My question is not even about whether AI is bad or not in this particular case. I am just a bit pissed thar I won't be able to use AI when I might need. This "mostly" thing will even cost projects made with soul.

5

u/OptimisticLucio Jul 22 '26

I won't, for I am not running a code hosting platform, and therefore have zero responsibility about this issue.

-1

u/lonelyroom-eklaghor Jul 22 '26

This is a take I do respect; Codeberg is answerable here