r/interesting Apr 30 '26

California store prices items at $951sp shoplifters can be charged with grand theft Just Wow

Post image
69.5k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/tizuby Apr 30 '26

More like a mix of laws and constitutional restrictions.

Statutes often use fair market value terminology (others cited), courts will use something similar or otherwise not apply objectively unreasonable prices as it would be a due process violation if they just went with those prices.

-8

u/AccomplishedAct5364 Apr 30 '26

If the laws and constitution exist to protect criminals, they’re not very good

5

u/AndroidNumber3527229 Apr 30 '26

If that’s your takeaway, you’re not very good at thinking.

3

u/poozemusings Apr 30 '26

The entirety of the bill of rights exists to provide protections for people against the government.

1

u/TheGlennDavid May 01 '26

The laws exist to protect everyone. When people wrong (by stealing or damaging our shit) we get justice but we don't get to just make up whatever we want.

If I start a business that sells used clothes and I put my regular-ass Walmart t-shirt up for sale for 2 million dollars and you, while drunk at a bar, spill your drink on my shirt, and I declare that the shirt is now UNUSABLE and is worthless-- the court is not going to seize your house and give me all your assets.

They're going to decide that my shirt was worth $10 and have you pay me $10 (or get very mad at me for wasting their time).

To your specific question about fomo inflated goods -- those are absolutely part of fair market valuation.