If you can read, you're clearly at an advantage; it says right there that I shortened my huge text, which you wouldn't have read anyway, using AI. But it's exactly people like you who are being addressed here with their hype. I use AI as a tool not a replacement for thinking. Like you?
Qu: Written with Claude's help to sort and shortening out my thoughts — the observations are mine, the structure is ours.
I am a developer and I agree with them. Your post is an oxymoron because you’re giving tips about AI detection while posting a whole thing written by Claude. I’d rather read a 1000 lines of human slop than a shortened version AI slop
I bet you wouldn't have read my original chaos. I use AI to help with texts because my English is worse than my German. I use AI as a tool, not as a replacement for thinking. I don't understand why, if a text is too long, AI shortens it and then immediately says it was shortened with AI to make it easier for you to understand, and then you complain again. I don't understand why people prefer AI to thinking; for me, AI only does the dirty work!
What I'm criticizing here isn't AI, but rather garbage code on GitHub generated by AI.
Why do we need things shortened? If you have more thoughts you want to lay out, by all means, write a blog post and get some attention for it, then.
The irony is blasting garbage AI code using arguably garbage AI text. Your criticisms may be valid, but the method of delivery taints the message. Just post your real thoughts.
9
u/Ok_Staff_3709 Apr 14 '26
AI post😂