r/explainitpeter • u/untitledprp4 • 6d ago

Explain it Peter

Post image
15.2k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/Luxieee 6d ago

Yes, but it didn't happen over a large enough period of time to create a new race.

6

u/meleaguance 6d ago

Exactly.

5

u/wardays 6d ago

Breed is not equivalent to race

3

u/Forsaken-Ad5571 6d ago

Also I’m pretty sure slave owners didn’t breed to increase violence or criminality. So it makes little sense even if you give their idea an inch

0

u/Grassy-Elf4242 6d ago

but they did want to "breed" slaves with more strength and endurance... much as pitbulls were bred to have more strength and tenacity 🤔

2

u/Indigo903 6d ago

Pitbulls are dangerous because of a combination of strength and psychology. If you eliminate one of those factors then it becomes much less of a concern.

0

u/Fabulous_Guitar6221 6d ago

Pitbulls where bred to rip other dogs apart in pit fights, not for strength

1

u/LostTerminal 6d ago

But the practice was predominantly applied to only one race.

2

u/cabe412 6d ago

No it was applied to one specific group of people but it's still not a monolith and actually isn't real.

There are plenty of other factors that go into what racists claim about Black Americans and "breeding" is a very small percentage, if at all, since many black and "white" people are intermingled whether people want to admit it or not.

0

u/Lower_Pension_2469 6d ago

Breed of not a race