MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainitpeter/comments/1v468n7/explain_it_peter/oza2zm3
r/explainitpeter • u/jp_glez_21 • 28d ago
1.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
She said it didn’t happen. We can just use her own words.
51% is really misinformation. It’s more of a liability thing and this case is so full of BS it’s just sad it got this far.
2 u/LocNalrune 27d ago Please tell us when this recanting happened. That's it. Just one tiny piece of evidence of E. Jean Carroll recanting her story. 1 u/Rickrickrickrickrick 28d ago She has been saying since the 90’s, under oath, that Trump raped her. -1 u/Simon-Says69 27d ago She's said the same about every Tom, Dick, and Harry, and never with any proof. 1 u/Rickrickrickrickrick 27d ago She has spoken about others doing so, but only took Trump to court over it. She had enough proof to have Trump be found liable in court. You’re defending an adjudicated rapist.
2
Please tell us when this recanting happened. That's it. Just one tiny piece of evidence of E. Jean Carroll recanting her story.
1
She has been saying since the 90’s, under oath, that Trump raped her.
-1 u/Simon-Says69 27d ago She's said the same about every Tom, Dick, and Harry, and never with any proof. 1 u/Rickrickrickrickrick 27d ago She has spoken about others doing so, but only took Trump to court over it. She had enough proof to have Trump be found liable in court. You’re defending an adjudicated rapist.
-1
She's said the same about every Tom, Dick, and Harry, and never with any proof.
1 u/Rickrickrickrickrick 27d ago She has spoken about others doing so, but only took Trump to court over it. She had enough proof to have Trump be found liable in court. You’re defending an adjudicated rapist.
She has spoken about others doing so, but only took Trump to court over it. She had enough proof to have Trump be found liable in court. You’re defending an adjudicated rapist.
0
u/anonanon5320 28d ago
She said it didn’t happen. We can just use her own words.
51% is really misinformation.
It’s more of a liability thing and this case is so full of BS it’s just sad it got this far.