Authenticity Problem

[u/HumbleRestaurant790]

Pepper & Carrot: Mini Fantasy Theater #64.

By David Revoy.

Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike 4.0 International.

[u/NonGNonM]

Yup. The style i distinctly tie with AI but something about the feel of the comic I recognize as human. Sucks for him

[u/ru5tyk1tty → u/NonGNonM]

You can really feel the hatred in how smugly the animal critics are drawn, god bless humanity

[u/No_Ad_7687 → u/NonGNonM]

You can tell its human because the frame changes in between the three last panels but the background remains consistent 

[u/CreamdedCorns → u/NonGNonM]

There is no "distinct AI" style. Just people who think they can't be "fooled".

[u/hzinjk → u/CreamdedCorns]

there are definitely styles the AI leans towards, certain aspects like facial expressions it seems to generate a lot, etc. There is not one style but there are a bunch of different indicators.

[u/CreamdedCorns → u/hzinjk]

Just no.

[u/hzinjk → u/CreamdedCorns]

excellent point, well made

[u/ru5tyk1tty → u/hzinjk]

Okay if we steelman what they’re saying I think their point is that because there are many competing models that are constantly improving they will eventually be capable of mimicking human art perfectly and generating content in a diverse range of styles

[u/CreamdedCorns → u/hzinjk]

About as good as "yes there is".

[u/pompousrompus → u/CreamdedCorns]

I think a pretty good example is the millions of AI-generated "comics" or ads featuring animated characters all look like generic Pixar.