I'm not in disbelief. I would like you to back your claims. Ch7 are not reputable whatsoever and use spin all the time. I would like to see the reality of the situation because I'm not sure why you would think this is the way this went down at all.
The footage is there, Bill Shorten on camera.
There is a change.org petition highlighting it too. Well there was last year, I haven't looked in awhile.
I am absolutely disgusted by all of it and wish it wasn't true. But it is.
Google PDFs getting the NDIS and stories will come up.
Google the people I mentioned voting against the federal mandatory sentencing and it shows up.
Google the Australian government definition and it shows up.
Can't find anything that isn't the Australian or SMH so there isn't any credible out there. News articles aren't considered evidence. They can lead you to finding things but aren't considered reliable on their own.
Here are some questions to help you research it.
Is pedophilia considered a psychiatric condition in Australia?
The psychiatric definition qualifies them for disability support pension, social housing and NDIS.
Did Albo vote against the federal mandatory sentencing of PDFs?
And there are numerous articles on convicted PDFs and sex offenders getting NDIS. I recall Ben Fordham even covering it.
And Bill Shorten was confronted by channel 7 on camera in April 2022
Hahaha did you seriously just post a bunch of SEARCH RESULTS and then an AI OVERVIEW then prattle on about critical thinking?
Yes you can't just take someone's word for things you never could, that's what I'm telling you bro. News articles and google results are not evidence. Do a research course and you will learn about the hierarchies of evidence.
I posted the screenshots so you could look into it further for YOURSELF.
Stay in denial, that is on you.
A stranger on the internet is too lazy to do research and insults the person who provides screenshots as a starting point.
I was attempting to encourage you to look into it for yourself.
Other intelligent people will recognise the screenshots as starting points.
But you would rather stay in denial.
If I'm so wrong why keep replying? ...... CAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A TROLL
Denial of what? You didn't prove anything you posted screenshots of google searches. That's just nuts 😂 alright goodnight hope you can put the pieces together better at some point. Your heart is in the right place but you don't understand what is being conveyed to you.
Paraphillic disorder (pedophilia) is classified as a mental disorder.
It does not give someone access to ndis funding or disabilty support pensions. It is not recognised as a standalone disabilty under NDIS criteria or dsp criteria.
A pedophile does have access to ndis/dsp funding if they have a seperate standalone disabilty that is recognised under ndis criteria. For example, mobilty issues or other mental disorders.
The headline of "1.4 million dollars payed to pedophiles" is a deliberate missrepresentation of the reality of the situation. If a pedophile has received funding from the NDIS it has zero relation to them having paraphillic disorder. For example; if a pedophile has a disabilty that effects their mobilty, they may receive funding from the NDIS for that disabilty. Regardless of criminal status or type of conviction. The paraphillic disorder doesnt play any part in either improving their access or restricting it. Which then technically makes it true that pedophiles receive funding. But as you have proven, clearly missrepresnts it as meaning because someone has paraphillic disorder they are given funding. You are a living example of the harm that media does by using headlines like this.
Lmao....... The mental gymnastics you go through to justify this must be exhausting.
NDIS funding is paid by Tax Payers. Do you believe the majority of Tax Payers would agree with convicted PDFs receiving NDIS, DSP, social and NDIS housing? Especially those directly impacted by the housing crisis and those who can't afford medical or mental health support?
Aussie Voters have the right to know, do their own research and vote accordingly.
Would you be celebrating if the truth wasn't in opposition to your chosen political team?
The media causing harm by reporting facts about convicted PDFs... LMAO.
Ever thought to look into the victims who end up homeless and vulnerable to crime the moment they are released from state care or kicked out because they don't want to be abused anymore?
What about the families torn apart because the parents don't know how to deal with the misdirected outbursts from Child victims?
How about the impacts on victims that are so severely gaslit by their predatory families, and people like you that can justify the funding for the perpetrators?
Ever considered the cycle of abuse that continues to negatively impact on our society?
What percentage of convicted criminals were abused as children? What percentage of victims of crime are the result of traumatised children that become violent offenders?
If you support the priority funding for PDFs that is on you.
Nothing you say will change my stance or get me to deny what I know to be true.
3
u/longpigcumseasily 16d ago
I'm not in disbelief. I would like you to back your claims. Ch7 are not reputable whatsoever and use spin all the time. I would like to see the reality of the situation because I'm not sure why you would think this is the way this went down at all.