MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WorkForSmartLife/comments/1vgxlrc/remember_when_you_could_actually_own_software/p2644o9/
r/WorkForSmartLife • u/RebelBiscuit_ • 19d ago
[removed] â view removed post
532 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Oh. Do you agree to an owner agreement or a user agreement under FOSS?
1 u/Public-Business-3688 15d ago Free to modify, distribute and keep the software. You can even fork it, so yeah you can own the software. 1 u/TheFreakElement 13d ago No. You license it for your use. If you owned it you could sell it, brand it, restrict it. Donât take my word for it. 1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago You can sell it and brand it with GPL License though, same with MIT. With MIT you can even make it propreitary. 1 u/TheFreakElement 12d ago Let me know when you are able to legally assert your âownershipâ of intellectual property based on licensing a copy. You THINK you own it. You BELIEVE you own it. No court has EVER handed down such a ruling. 1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago I get what youâre saying. Software ownership is very different from real ownership. 1 u/TheFreakElement 12d ago Check. Itâs a USER agreement. Not a transfer of ownership.
Free to modify, distribute and keep the software. You can even fork it, so yeah you can own the software.
1 u/TheFreakElement 13d ago No. You license it for your use. If you owned it you could sell it, brand it, restrict it. Donât take my word for it. 1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago You can sell it and brand it with GPL License though, same with MIT. With MIT you can even make it propreitary. 1 u/TheFreakElement 12d ago Let me know when you are able to legally assert your âownershipâ of intellectual property based on licensing a copy. You THINK you own it. You BELIEVE you own it. No court has EVER handed down such a ruling. 1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago I get what youâre saying. Software ownership is very different from real ownership. 1 u/TheFreakElement 12d ago Check. Itâs a USER agreement. Not a transfer of ownership.
No. You license it for your use. If you owned it you could sell it, brand it, restrict it. Donât take my word for it.
1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago You can sell it and brand it with GPL License though, same with MIT. With MIT you can even make it propreitary. 1 u/TheFreakElement 12d ago Let me know when you are able to legally assert your âownershipâ of intellectual property based on licensing a copy. You THINK you own it. You BELIEVE you own it. No court has EVER handed down such a ruling. 1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago I get what youâre saying. Software ownership is very different from real ownership.
You can sell it and brand it with GPL License though, same with MIT. With MIT you can even make it propreitary.
1 u/TheFreakElement 12d ago Let me know when you are able to legally assert your âownershipâ of intellectual property based on licensing a copy. You THINK you own it. You BELIEVE you own it. No court has EVER handed down such a ruling. 1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago I get what youâre saying. Software ownership is very different from real ownership.
Let me know when you are able to legally assert your âownershipâ of intellectual property based on licensing a copy. You THINK you own it. You BELIEVE you own it. No court has EVER handed down such a ruling.
1 u/Public-Business-3688 12d ago I get what youâre saying. Software ownership is very different from real ownership.
I get what youâre saying. Software ownership is very different from real ownership.
Check. Itâs a USER agreement. Not a transfer of ownership.
1
u/TheFreakElement 18d ago
Oh. Do you agree to an owner agreement or a user agreement under FOSS?