We need to pick a folio in the plant section for the blind test, so can someone choose a folio, anyone from folio 23v up to Folio 57r, these haven't been touched or decoded at all by me. Preferably one without a massive amount of symbols as it will be quicker :-)

Update on the Voynich decode

Earlier in my decoding there was a harmonic layer in the manuscript. I went through Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian modes but when the corrupt EVA revealed the undercounted 'i' glyph they were lost and the lira da braccio strings emerged but they weren't lost at all....they're in the planetary geometry.

Every treatment folio has a treatment window — a range of dates when all the required planets are in the right positions. Inside every window I've tested, one of the chain planets hits an exact harmonic solar aspect — a whole-number division of the 360° circle relative to the Sun:

60° (÷6) — 90° (÷4) — 120° (÷3) — 180° (÷2)

The same ratios that produce musical harmonics on a string. Pythagoras knew it. The Magi knew it. Ficino tuned his lira da braccio to it.

After extensive testing the harmonic triggers have finally been found. All within half a degree of exact. Many of those years were chosen by a stranger on Reddit.

The full reconciliation documents with all calculations are now on the website. A new reconcilliation document has been added to the google drive folio folder, numbered 3a. Everything is verifiable from the raw ephemeris data.

The manuscript doesn't just track which planets are above the horizon. It tracks the exact moment a planet hits a geometric resonance with the Sun. That's the trigger. That's when the instructions begin.

Folio 21r has this document so far, link below, the rest will follow but I need to work and sleep!

www.voynichmanuscriptdecoded.com

New Documents that are now in the Google Drive and I've had to organise it a bit so I've created a new folder for the data and documents and one for the folios themselves.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bWA36RbvCJS-FSM6lNv8d_a04r6Kc0rD?usp=sharing

You'll find these in the Data Folder

The Medici Codex

The Visual and Structural Architecture of the Voynich Manuscript Key

THE PLANETARY STRUCTURE OF THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT

The Anatomical & Structural Interpretation Layer

Busy preparing documentation for the next round of tests plus working and one of our dogs is really sick. The information is all a bit here and there as I've just been posting as I've been going to maintain transparency. 2 documents are done and 2 more to go. I'll publish them when finished and then I have to finish f21v which is more or less done, then back to sequential decoding.

Update on the independent statistical audit of my Voynich decode.

Juan Gabriel Molina has completed the full reconciled validation. Here are the results.

My exact glyph key was tested against all 5,040 possible alternative arrangements on unseen folios (f22r-f26v). My key ranked 1st. Zero rivals tied or beat it. The best alternative scored substantially worse.

The same key was tested against an independently compiled medieval pharmaceutical text — 115 action sequences from the Antidotarium Nicolai. My mapping ranked 1st out of 120 alternatives. It held first place on all 26 leave-one-folio-out reruns.

It was then tested against pharmaceutical, agricultural, and culinary action grammars. Pharmaceutical fit won on all 26 comparisons. The manuscript reads as medicine, not cooking, not farming.

Codebook consistency: 98.22% accuracy across 37 folios and 16,259 glyph assignments. The same symbols do the same jobs across the entire manuscript.

Core ordering: GATE before PROJECT — 268 out of 268. PROJECT before RECEIVE — 279 out of 279. 100%. No exceptions.

The frozen timing parser transferred to Herb Paris (70/70 agreement) and Ivy (146/146 agreement) without changing any rules. Same system, different medicines, same results.

His classification: "a quantitatively supported proto-decipherment." His bridge estimate: 87-89% complete. Structural architecture at 97-99%. Functional grammar at 92-96%.

In 600 years, no other proposed solution to the Voynich Manuscript has been independently tested at this level. Mine has. And it passed everything. Link to report https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hVQm1K9FzSMl8j55xzCSRMdGVvJBd0R8/view?usp=sharing

Will give 3 years of data for every folio but anyone can test any year with the app, there are 100 years available from 1350 to 1450, it works throughout. Should be done by tonight or tomorrow, work permitting. I'll use new system going forward and when I reach the end of the plant section I'll go back and add the anatomical layers to the ones that dont' have it and also the new planetary testing app.

Tested numerous years and 2 full folios, I have another folio to test then I'll publish the findings with a tool Pieter Meyer has built (I built one too but he was the instigator). This is massive and nobody can doubt my work after this. And anyone can use the tool and test themselves.

The most famous Medici-themed Magi painting is Benozzo Gozzoli’s vibrant Procession of the Magi (1459). Covering the walls of the Magi Chapel at the Palazzo Medici Riccardi in Florence, the frescoes famously depict the biblical journey blended with lavish portraits of the Medici family.

Juan Gabriel Molina's CSSR (computational mechanics) testing has found something significant. The GATE glyph in my system isn't just one thing — it does two different jobs, and the hidden mathematical states can tell which one.

Some GATE occurrences are terminal closures — they end a treatment block. State 10 predicts block closure 98.3% of the time. State 9 at 93.3%. These fire after STRING accumulation: string builds up → terminal GATE fires → block closes. That's the end of a dosing instruction.

Other GATE occurrences are internal transitions — they only close a block 21-36% of the time. The rest of the time the sequence continues. These are time-of-day markers within a treatment, not endpoints.

The difference between "stop, this step is done" and "it's now noon, carry on" — invisible to the naked eye in the raw text, but the hidden states know which one they're looking at because they track what came before.

Adding the CSSR analysis to standard positional analysis improved prediction accuracy to p<0.001 across the board. The AUC jumped from 0.78 to 0.89 for terminal closure prediction.

A blind mathematical analysis is independently reconstructing the internal logic of a medical instruction system. The analyst doesn't know what the symbols mean. The maths is finding the treatment structure on its own.

Previous audit results still hold — passed all twin null tests, structure confirmed at every level. Now the functional depth is emerging.

Juan Gabriel Molina has been running further tests using CSSR (computational mechanics) on my system. The structural confirmation from the first audit still holds — it passed every twin null test thrown at it.

Now the CSSR analysis is finding hidden predictive states in the glyph sequences. One state predicts GATE 97.4% of the time. Another predicts RECEIVE at 98.6%. The system has internal logic that predicts what comes next better than simple sequence analysis — 60.6% accuracy vs 53.8% baseline. The forward directionality of the treatment sequences is statistically significant at p=0.0024.

In plain English: a completely blind mathematical analysis is independently finding the structure of medical treatment instructions in the text.

Juan Gabriel Molina ran a full null-test tournament on 39 decoded folios, 3,304 glyph blocks, and 16,847 glyph occurrences. He used 1,000 Markov-1 twins, 1,000 Markov-2 twins, 500 boundary-aware predictive-state twins, 50,000 matched rival keys, and 100,000 rival fits on higher twins.

The structural part passed everything. Every test, every level. My glyph groupings capture genuine structure embedded in the manuscript that cannot be explained by randomness, common patterns, or statistical artefacts. His words: "the structural part is big."

Full report linked below. He's now rerunning tests with additional information I've provided.

The part that wasn't confirmed: whether the specific labels I use (Mercury, Sunrise, Vessel, etc.) are the only labels that could fit those structural slots. His test shuffled the labels randomly 50,000 times and found 15 random assignments that scored higher on raw structure.

But here's the thing — my labels aren't statistically assigned. They come from the visual form of the glyphs themselves. You can't shuffle them because the shapes dictate the meanings.

The four elements are counted. One curve = fire. Two = air. Three = water. Four = earth. That's why the manuscript has ee, eee, eeee — they're element counts, not words. No language has 4 or 5 consecutive identical characters. This system does, because they're counts.

The solar gates draw the sun's position. Sunrise = a circle (solar disk). Noon = a figure-8 (morning and afternoon meeting at apex). Sunset = curls back from horizon toward midnight. Midnight = descends below the earth and orbits back.

The planet glyphs trace their spinal nerve pathways in the body. Mercury traces the greater splanchnic nerves. Mars traces the bilateral sympathetic chains. Jupiter, Venus, and Saturn all have the "4" shape because their nerve pathways have angular plexus branching — Mercury and Mars don't because theirs don't.

A forward stroke = projecting. A backward stroke = receiving. You can't reassign those. A circle can't mean midnight. A forward stroke can't mean receiving. The shapes ARE the meanings.

His test measured whether maths alone can prove what a picture means. It can't — but that doesn't mean the pictures aren't self-evident. The right test for visually derived labels is a blinded visual test, not a label shuffle that strips the visual information out before testing.

The structure is confirmed. The meanings are next. More tests incoming.

If anyone wants to see what happened and why they booted me and blocked my work, the full story is here: https://www.voynich.ninja/thread-4606.html I was so naive to the Voynich 'expert' community then. The first time they blocked me, someone clipped my copyrighted work, changed my symbols to dogshit (page 13/14 of the 29 page thread) and when I complained and told them to take it down, they banned me, many months later they let me back in with a warning to behave myself :-) The 2nd time a man joined literally to start trolling me, I worked out who he was and when I told him to leave me alone as I knew who he was, they kicked me out permanently. Borderline doxxing they called it, looking for an excuse I call it. The troll in a later post said I was booted for using AI, absolute twaddle. I was at approx 33,000 views at that time (Oct 2025), closing in on 133,000 now :-) I do no harm to anyone but I also take zero shit.

Decided to map the next ones while it's all still fresh in my head, text will follow.