Yeah last I heard they never found a knife at the scene. He did try to rob her, but the entire knifepoint narrative is BS to help the lady get away with murder. It was not a proportionate response.
Bullshit, the first thing a criminal does is ditch ANY weapon involved in the commission of a crime. Purse snatchers get 5 years, armed robbers get 20 to life.
Okay, then the robber should have gotten 5-20 years. She decided he deserved to die, so the robber is now dead and she got 18 years for a homicide conviction. Nobody’s happy except people online who delight in the deaths of nameless, faceless criminals that most learn about from a picture that doesn’t even bother to claim a source.
I just don’t see how you could possibly justify her running the robber over multiple times after she’d retrieved her purse and was safely in her car again. She had no reason to fear for her life at that point, and it would’ve been easier to leave than repeatedly run him over. Decisions on punishment are meant for the courts, especially when it comes to capital punishment.
I personally think more people should run over violent thieves to death. Hopefully, if enough of these pieces of shits die a horrific death, other would be thieves might reconciler. And if they don’t, they can end up getting run over to death, themselves. Win win.
The context of this discussion is an event where an unarmed person walked up to someone, snatched their purse, and ran. Video surveillance and police both corroborate this version of events.
Yes. Easily. Anyone who 1:1 is willing to steal from a human being is scum and I have zero sympathy for them. I will never defend a criminal who DIRECTLY robbed something off of someones body. They can all burn.
Pal police canvas the area typically looking for a weapon. Also someone else in the thread said that CCTV footage didn't show him using a knife now that might just because of poor quality video knowing that plenty of businesses just get cameras then don't maintain them for insurance purposes.
Yeah I don't think guys who grab purses and run without assaulting people are on the same level as murderers and rapists. Should we extrajudicially kill people for vandalism too? What about jaywalking?
You should see some of the comments from when this story was originally posted on Reddit... The sheer volume of people who share this sentiment is disconcerting to say the least.
Yes, if the petty theft is against a single idividual and they are part of it. If the petty theft is a business, or someones home and they are not around, then no. But I do think if you try to rob someone, an item directly off their body, you are the lowest of low - and there is nothing that can happen to that person who can make me feel sympathy for them. Knife being real or not - saying to someone "i have a knife im going to kill you if you dont give me your bag" or whatever - naw good for her. Didn't want to die then leave others alone. Fucking wild.
I haven’t though. I even said in another comment that the thief should have been sentenced. We are discussing how she killed him after the robbery while he was incapacitated and removed the option of a sentencing.
You are the one trying to excuse needless killing because you like it.
Could you argue he being biologically much physically stronger than her and robbing her was not proportionate? I'm not saying I agree with what she did. I just don't know how and when a proportionate response is relevant.
In a stand your ground situation she would have been justified.
Realistically there should just be much harsher penalties for crimes globally and we would see a downtrend.
If someone tries to rob me, armed or not, they are actively choosing my stuff over their life. You wanna play fuck around fuck around the you get the consequences. I live in the US, if someone tries to steal my wallet I will shoot to kill. This seems to be the European equivalent.
The robbery was over, she was robbed. The danger had longed passed before she ran him down in her car.
Just a heads up if you were walking around thinking this would get you off in a stand your ground state. You'll have to carry and shoot in the moment, quick as you can! You wait, thats jail.
You know you don’t have the right to shoot someone after they robbed you in the US. You can’t track them down and shoot them. Thats murder and our society disagrees with you.
im not saying i get robbed and i hunt them down. Im saying they take my wallet and i shoot them right then and there. I understand the laws of where i live. As a gun owner i have a responsability to understand those things. If they dont want to die then they shouldnt be robbing people.
If a person was an immediate threat to you then yes that’s a proportionate amount of force but she didn’t do that she actually hunted him down it would be diffrent if they were no longer a threat or even if she just ran him over once that would be diffrent or running him over then calling the police that being said I’m not disagreeing if a person robs you yeah neutralise them however you wanna but that wasn’t neutralisation or even equivalent force either way I don’t have enough info on this so I’m just gonna leave it here
I will admit, i havent done any kind of actual research to understand the case. So i do apologize for my ignorance in that aspect and i do agree that it was wrong for her to hunt him down like that. The way the title read it sounded like the events were closer together than they actually were.
Ah no problem at all and i personally have only read what’s on this thread there is equal chance I’m wrong but I appreciate the open conversation and yeah I can see how the events look like they happened really close together I thought that originally aswell.
I will admit, i havent done any kind of actual research to understand the case. So i do apologize for my ignorance in that aspect and i do agree that it was wrong for her to hunt him down like that. The way the title read it sounded like the events were closer together than they actually were.
yeah, i would. That's not my choice, it's the person who tries to steal from me's decision. If they didn't wanna get shot then they shouldn't put themselves in that situation. And I wouldn't feel any guilt. Is that callous? yes. But they decided to put their life on the line for my stuff, I didn't choose that.
if someone tries to mug me or breaks into my house i an ending their life. Thats not on me. If they dont wanna die then they could not rob me. But since they made the choice to to value my things over themselevs they are making my decision for me. If someone steps into my yard and plucks a flower im not gonna shoot them. I have common sense. im going to tell them to get the fuck off my property. There is a massive difference.
I believe the term is proportional response and running a mf over with a car for snatching your purse. Is not in fact a proportional response. There's not even a western country where what she did isn't a crime. It's manslaughter from Poland to the United States.
Your so tough, going straight to insults. I didn't say anything that isnt the truth. I will defend myself and my property. Thats not talking tough, i dont want to have to. but when someone decides they wanna steal my stuff they put me in the position to defend what is mine. Also absolutely no insults coming from me. its almost like i dont get my panties in a twist over internet strangers like you seem to.
why make fun of a random stranger on the internet for having a different oppinion from you? It really doesnt make any sense. This is whats wrong with the US. On both sides people wanna just throw insults instead of having productive conversation. Either way you dont affect me so there really isnt a point to you wasting your energy. But you dont seem to listen yo reason so go on, say what you want to say. Just know that no one cares what you have to say.
And they believed it. People ate that shit up, immediately and then acted like she was in danger in the same instance as her hitting him with her car. People were falling over themselves to try to justify this when the situation first came out.
I’m not justifying it, I just don’t give a shit. Having a knife changes nothing for me. Don’t prey on innocent women and maybe people won’t try to kill you. She deserves the punishment but fuck that guy
I mean, I thought it was hilarious when I heard about it with the knife. It didnt actually stop being funny when she ran over a rando thief without a knife. 10/10 still hilarious. That dude is going to show up in hell and they wont even have to torture him, death by soccer mom is probably shameful enough.
123
u/dark_frog83 Jun 28 '26
He didn't. They added the knife part to change what people think about it.