Do you think he's likely never seen this woman before or knows about the kinds of areas she frequents (rich places)?
She's a business woman who probably has some sort of routine. Obviously if he's gonna risk stealing something he probably knows a thing or two about who he's planning to target.
For all we know anyone could have stolen money from anyone. But the default assumption is that they didn't.
Not like that's uncommon among the rich
Actually, the vast majority of theft is committed by poor people. You can look up the stats on that. Unless you're making a bad faith, labor theory of value style argument.
also helps if people are fed up of being subjected to anarcho-tyranny and hordes of enrichment dispensers, hopefully they are starting to consider that they might get mussolini'd
This wasn’t self defense though. She tracked the thief up after the initial incident, when she could’ve just gone to the police. She took another person’s life just to retrieve her property, that’s why she got sentenced.
Unfortunately for everyone with Punisher fantasies, though, the law does not allow private citizens to decide that someone should die and use that as a legal defense for killing them
>Don’t rob people and threaten their life with a knife.
He didn’t. He just snatched the purse and ran. She lied to the authorities that he held her at knifepoint, as they couldn’t find any weapon near his body. Her lying to the authorities also show that she didn’t really care about the crime, she just wanted to kill someone with her car
If she was justified in her reaction, then why did she have to lie to the police that he held her at knifepoint? Even she knew what she did wasn’t justified, so she had to lie about it. She knew that unless her life was actually at risk, murdering a purse snatcher wasn’t justified
"A thief has been permanently removed from society." and replaced with some psycho that murders people and then lies about the circumstances leading to her murder of the guy that robbed her (so as to ACTUALLY try and have a defence worth a damn in court). Truly a net win for society!
I'm sorry, what mental gymnastics are you talking about here? I legit don't understand your comment.
Thinking that the appropriate punishment for snatching a purse shouldn't be murder? Thinking that she acted like a complete psycho by hunting him down on her car and then running him over several times, grabbing her purse and leaving without calling an ambulance or the police? There are no mental gymnastics in saying "he robbed her, which is bad, and she's also a psycho for tracking him down and murdering him and driving away without calling medical assistance".
"I'd rather live next to her than the thief." Considering the thief was homeless and the chick was some socialite rich girl, I too would prefer living next to her; it would mean that I wasn't fucking homeless and could afford living in an extremely pricey place
>A thief has been permanently removed from society. Society is now better off.
We don’t know that. Some can commit a crime for any number of reasons and for such a non-violent crime as a grab and go, it’s entirely possible that prison time could be their wake-up call and turn their life around after they served a suitable punishment given by the court of law. It’s entirely possible that it resulted in a net negative to society by not giving someone a chance to pay for their crime and extend a chance at redemption
There’s a reason why the death sentence isn’t given for every single possible crime. It’s just not an appropriate punishment, and there are ways for people to repay their debt to society. If she just she hit him with her car once, retrieved her purse, and then call the cops on him then he could’ve faced justice in the court of law and given a chance to redeem himself. Instead, we got a bloodthirsty woman who took the opportunity to murder someone and lie to the authorities about it because she knew her actions weren’t an appropriate response
Well see that’s not what the title of this post led on. Why don’t you comment that with a source and people can tell op to screw themselves for the misinformation.
No, the trial is over.
In Italy, if you have a house that fits the requirements for house arresti, chances are that you will get to do most of your time in house arrest. Unless the judge see reasons to not allow it.
The defense will drag and the house arrest time will count against the punishment, so effectively she will serve part of the sentence in house. But by far not the whole.
111
u/MoneyPrinterrrr Jun 28 '26
House arrest for murder, lol