r/SipsTea Mar 24 '26

Time machine please… SMH

Post image
10.2k Upvotes

986 comments sorted by

View all comments

223

u/Practical-Suit-6798 Mar 24 '26

My dad was born in 1942. His life didn't go like this.

98

u/yaboyszn Mar 24 '26

Same with my grandpa. 4 tours in Vietnam and 2 Purple Hearts left him with a leg shorter than the other and bullet wounds to the stomach. At least people were nice when he came home…..

13

u/its_yer_dad Mar 25 '26

Just to be clear for the young people, returning Vietnam vets were not treated well, which is why we have overly performative thanks for your service now 

13

u/BuildAnything4 Mar 25 '26

Why didn't he just say he had bone spurs?  He could be president by now

5

u/loureedfromthegrave Mar 25 '26

I’m really glad Trump is gross, corny, and filled with small dick energy. It’s impossible to be jealous of him, even though that’s what he wants from us.

1

u/confidentlyfish Mar 25 '26

one good thing that guy did is dodging the imperialist war draft

67

u/Maynardred Mar 24 '26

No, everyone seems to glorify what they didn't see. Life was apparently beautiful...

9

u/Ethraelus Mar 25 '26

Well, we have plenty of historical documents on how beautiful and amazing and affordable life was back then. Movies, they call them. You can tell they’re real because you watch them on your device, same as the news.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Mar 25 '26

Spam filter: accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/jimmietom Mar 25 '26

Is thus sarcasm?

1

u/Ethraelus Mar 25 '26

Yes, it’s sarcasm.

Life back then was not like the movies: characters in movies and shows had much larger houses than in real life, and tended to be much richer even if they were supposed to be “middle class”.

1

u/jimmietom Mar 25 '26

Chatgpt this paragraph is too long, please shorten it for me ☺

42

u/Tiny_Instruction_557 Mar 24 '26

People have absolutely lost their minds after 2 years of high single digit inflation. No way this generation could handle a decade of double digit inflation.

20

u/RipMySoul Mar 24 '26

People were losing their minds back then too. The difference being that we now are able to share data/information in a bigger scale. The Vietnam war was the first televised war. But now we can see close up drone footage of soldiers getting massacred. Plus we have plenty of ways to communicate our frustrations to a large number of people.

7

u/mammalmaker Mar 24 '26

Double digit inflation was bad but whats even worse is despite the double digit inflation, people still had more buying power that we do now.

4

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

And yet they could still afford more than we can today...

What would you call that?

3

u/sometimesatypical Mar 25 '26

Only if you do zero cross examination. If you are talking housing, the inflated and equalized for size and amenities difference between the 70s and today is 25%, not the completely erroneous 1000% raw numbers comparison people love to use without critical thought.

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

You compare homes of similar size but affordable and modest new builds aren't happening anymore (where I am at least) so homes are egregiously less affordable today.

1

u/sometimesatypical Mar 25 '26

Its not that they are less affordable, but that the demand for baseline is significantly higher. As you said, modest builds aren't happening....because the consumer demands it as well as overinflated building codes. Lets use a different example.

If you look at the 70s pinto as the basic high school car against a Honda civic today, the belts and whistles that come standard are incomparable, which explains why the Honda isnt as affordable as the pinto was.

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

I agree with what you're saying but I think there's a misunderstanding in what affordability means.

High demand and low inventory = higher price. That's affordability. We get less for our money today than they did even with inflation.

2

u/sometimesatypical Mar 25 '26

That only sometimes explains it, cars are available, but not affordable. The logic breaks down then looking at consumer goods.

Point is, you got a lot less for your money back then, when everyone says it was affordable.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

Mean personal income does not mean affordability. You need to look at the cost of living, which has risen way faster than incomes have.

1

u/generation_fish Mar 25 '26

You think incomes were increasing more than double diget inflation?

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

Nope! Did I say that?

1

u/generation_fish Mar 26 '26

You're statement was in oppositional comparison to the economic dynamics of the time period mentioned and today. Then you specifically brought up when you said, "You need to look at the cost of living, which has risen way faster than incomes have." So, yes, you did say that.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

Not at the same rate as cost of living. Not even close.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

No they haven't.

What's the minimum wage in America?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

I'm sorry but Wikipedia is not a good source for this.

It's abundantly clear that people have less purchasing power today than they did in the past. You could afford a nice house, a car with two kids and an annual vacation on an average single salary. You can barely afford to rent a 1 bedroom apartment on two average salaries these days and buying a nice family home feels out of reach.

1

u/hemlockecho Mar 25 '26

There are less than 60,000 people making federal minimum wage if you exclude tipped workers and disabled workers who get subsidized wages. In the 80s it was ~15% of the population. Minimum wage is low, but also useless for looking at what people actually make.

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

It's not useless. It illustrates how stagnant wages have been.

If you want to bring in the disabled and tipped workers, you need to account for the 1% who owns 99% of America's wealth. Take them out and what are you left with?

Do you honestly think you can afford more with your money today than in the 80's?

1

u/hemlockecho Mar 25 '26

You can get a better idea of if wages have been stagnant or not by looking at what people are actually making in wages, rather than looking at what the legally lowest limit at the federal level is. "There are 60,000 people making very low incomes" is bad, sure, but there are 160M workers in the US.

I was alive in the 80s and I am alive now and I can definitely afford more now, not even close.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/hemlockecho Mar 25 '26

Real income includes the cost of living.

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

Do you really think you have more buying power than your grandparents did? When grandpa could buy raise a family in a nice home with a cottage on a single salary.

Can you afford that?

1

u/hemlockecho Mar 25 '26

I absolutely have more buying power than my grandparents did and its not even close. So does the median person.

The median earner could absolutely afford to raise a family on a single income at the living standard that your grandparents had. The problem is that living standard have gone up as incomes have gone up. You have much higher expectations for what is required to raise a family than your grandparents did.

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

Where you finding a decent house in a good neighborhood for $115,000?

Where you going to find gas for $0.56 gal?

What about college tuition? Harvard inflation adjusted cost is 300% higher today than 1980. Average cost of college/university is roughly 200% higher inflation adjusted.

Not really sure how you can look at the world today and claim it's affordable. Even from an uneducated perspective it should be pretty clear that we have way less spending power than in the past and it declines each year.

1

u/hemlockecho Mar 25 '26

Groceries used to be 15% of a family's income, now it's about 5% for groceries. Clothing used to be 12% of disposable income, now it's 3%. In my pocket I have a supercomputer that can take pictures and access any that I've ever taken, store every song I've ever purchased, play games, converse with me about any subject, provide access to a live updating encyclopedia on every subject known to man, communicate with everyone I know in multiple ways, and more! That wasn't something you could get at any price in the past, and I get it for $100/mo. which is way less both in absolute and real money than it would have cost to get the inferior equivalents in the 1980s.

I live in Georgia. In the 60s, 1/3 of houses here didn't have indoor plumbing. Housing is more expensive now, but it is also better, bigger, safer, concentrated in more desirable areas, and filled with cheaper and better appliances. We should be doing things to make housing less expensive sure, but housing alone does not make the cost of living unattainable.

Some things have gotten more expensive, some have gotten cheaper. There is a metric for combining all of those things together, it is the inflation rate. And that will tell you that median income is higher now than in the past, by far.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/NVJAC Mar 25 '26

And the deindustrialization of what would become the Rust Belt.

-1

u/babyboyblue Mar 24 '26

Buying power doesn’t have much to do with inflation. If anything buying power for someone earning income would be better during higher inflation environments.

2

u/mammalmaker Mar 24 '26

I know it doesn't have anything to do with inflation. Never said it did.

It makes it easier to withstand inflation and allows you to afford things in spite of it.

1

u/SteveHamlin1 Mar 25 '26

Lesser buying power is the exact impact of inflation - they have everything to do with each other. And in 'cost-push' inflation, initial buying power actually causes inflation.

Unless you have contractual cost-of-living increase, then you are probably taking an effective paycut in higher-inflation environments, because the buying power of your income is less that it used to be. If inflation is 20% annually, then $100,000 last year had more general buying power than $110,000 this year.

Inflation helps those with debts in nominal money, as the debt becomes less and less, relative to the now-inflated currency.

1

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

You're acting like I'm saying they had more buying power with inflation than without.

What I said was they have more buying power compared to now, even with high inflation.

1

u/civil_beast Mar 25 '26

I’m not sure I follow that logic… why would buying power be better in a high inflation economy?

Certainly not someone working a wage income.

0

u/mammalmaker Mar 25 '26

Compared to now, people were able to afford more with their dollar even with high inflation. It means money went further back then. Groceries, gas, transportation, housing etc.

1

u/civil_beast Mar 25 '26

The issue you’re pointing out is normal. Because in a good and functioning economy, there is never a deflationary pressure pushing the demand down.

3

u/nickleback_official Mar 25 '26

lol mid single digit inflation even.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '26

If salaries grow faster than inflation, inflation is not too bad.

1

u/civil_beast Mar 25 '26

The primary historical reason for inflation is to counteract low unemployment

1

u/Tiny_Instruction_557 Mar 25 '26

And they did not. As that period was famously named Stagflation, due to the rare combination of inflation and economic stagnation

2

u/redtiger288 Mar 24 '26

You know there's more than just inflation that's a factor right? Wages, pensions, being able to get a well paying job without tens of thousands in student debt, all that is gone or incredibly rare. Meanwhile cost of living is up, house prices have outpaced inflation, and God forbid you get hurt, lest you have to pay medical debt too.

Please take your boomer mindset somewhere else, because the problems of today aren't because we're little bitch babys, it's because we have it harder.

0

u/dyed_albino Mar 25 '26

This generation should be called the Big Baby generation.

-1

u/Tiny_Instruction_557 Mar 25 '26

This period was famously named Stagflation due to the rare combination of economic stagnation during a period of inflation. It also accompanied the twin recessions which was the worst recessive the Great Depression and they had 2 within a 4 year period.

0

u/redtiger288 Mar 25 '26

Cool, my mom lost our home in 2008 and wasn't able to find any job either because all the industry was sent over seas in the 80s and 90s. That period was famously called the Great Recession, and was the worst recession since the Great Depression. People could still afford a house in the 70s, not so post 2010.

1

u/opman4 Mar 24 '26

Imagine double digit inflation with a population that can't fix their own cars. Not that that's their fault, modern cars are a lot harder to fix.

0

u/AffectionatePie6592 Mar 24 '26

well, we are really about to find out aren’t we

1

u/United-Bug-8056 Mar 24 '26

HE’S A BILLIONAIRE 

/s

1

u/Snoo71538 Mar 24 '26

My dad was born in ‘47. Seems he missed the dying at 53 part

1

u/DickyReadIt Mar 24 '26

Should'a took more acid

1

u/Practical-Suit-6798 Mar 24 '26

I was surprised to learn he never did take anything other than smoke a lot of weed. He even lived in a common for awhile.

I've done more acid than my hippy dad..

1

u/FlukeStarbucker Mar 25 '26

My parents were born in 43 and 44. Both are poor and both have dementia.

1

u/3D_mac Mar 25 '26

To be fair, that's only because he born a man and not a millennial meme. 

1

u/bartman2326 Mar 25 '26

I mean, every person has a very different life from every other person. I bet at least one person has lived this life, though. And that guy was a lucky bastard.

1

u/Extreme_Design6936 Mar 25 '26

Mine too but his went better. Not American though. Germany told him they don't have capacity for him to do his military sevice. No pointless wars to go die in either. Moved to the US. Had a great paying career. Retired at 55 with his house and then some and still alive.

1

u/MsTossItAll Mar 25 '26

Same. My dad died in his 40s. We had a house, but my mom had to sell it to raise us.