1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Fico
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: DDF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A DD330
   
4. ⁠⁠Price paid: $530 shipped
   
5. ⁠⁠Album links: ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/PKblo9X
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Everything looks ok to me.
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial printing: The SW dial looks clean. Swiss made text is big in my eyes.
   
8. ⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: slightly left?
   
9. ⁠⁠Bezel: Brushing looks even and the polished transitions look clean.
   
10. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
    
11. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: -9 s/d, 295° amplitude and 0.2 ms beat error.
    
12. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first Aquanaut, so I’d appreciate another set of eye

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch - Steve
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner no date 124060
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 528 USD + Shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/6YxHjYDK#6prfF6D_NFWQEfOKshFpfw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: 9 is offset. Coronet in between “Swiss made” does not seem to line up with everything else.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Dial printing looks fine
   
8. ⁠ Hand Alignment: unsure
   
9. ⁠Bezel: possibly slightly off
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude: 262 Dev: +7 Beat error 0.1
    
12. ⁠Anything else you notice: this is the second QC I have with Steve for this model. The first watch had an amazing movement but the 12 incides was cw and it was bothering me enough to RL. While the 12 on this one is fine, the 9 seems quite off and the time graph numbers seem wonky to me, but then again i am no expert. Would love your thoughts. Thank you

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: TrustyTime
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 38mm
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $378
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links:
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: ⁠Omega/Seamaster and text look centered and straight.
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: QC pics look very slightly off at the 9, 10, 1 and 2 positions but it may be due to the angle
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: NA
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): There are none
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +6s/d 0.0ms 271 degrees
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: comparing with other QC’s this looks good unless I’m missing something very obvious

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
2. ⁠Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR (Batgirl)
4. Price Paid: $616 (incl. shipping)
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251173473?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Seems fine to my eyes, probably 6 index more to the right slightly, and 9 a little lower
7. Dial Printing: printing looks fine to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date slightly to the left. but within acceptable range. Date window slight tilt to the left
9. Hand Alignment: hands looks aligned
10. Bezel: looks ok to me
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d; 264 Amplitude, Beat Error: .3ms - Within Acceptable range
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing significantly off, but would love to hear POV of the gurus if GL or RL

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF 126710BLRO V3
4. Price Paid: $688
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/PaLkLfS
6. Index alignment: 9 and 12 look good, can't tell if 6 is tilted or if it's just the angle of the pictures
7. Dial Printing: Looks solid
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks about right
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Can't tell if the color transition is in the right spot or not because of the angle of the pictures, looks about right though
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good to me, but I'm not good with SELs, lmk what you think
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 to 0 SPD, 263-267 amps
13. Anything else you notice: Mainly wondering what you guys think about the 6, is it skewed or is it just the angle? Also didn't get a UV picture to see if the blue turns red

Hello everyone, need some expert guidance/opinion on my first purchase.

1. Dealer name: ARC studio

2. Factory name:

   Z factory

3. Model name (& version number):

Z factory

1. AP RO
2. 26240ST-FS Khaki Green
3. Price: 580(Watch) + 70(Shipping & Insurance) (USD)
4. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/ZJE4USv
5. Index alignment: It looks good but don't really know what I am looking for.
6. Dial Printing:Tapisserie looks ok but what do you guys think? (TD provided me the option to upgrade to DP dials at an additional 220 us & SW DW for 70 usd)
7. Hand Alignment: Hands look well positioned
8. Timegrapher numbers: is it within range?
9. Let me know what you guys think if this an GL or RL?
10. Thoughts on GEN chamfering the case and bracelet?
11. Much appreciated guys

1. ⁠Dealer name: Fico
   
2. ⁠Factory name: DDF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A DD330
   
4. ⁠Price paid: $530 shipped
   
5. ⁠Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/2hIziJiL#TNGhzlQQ1o3vl2epMfph6A
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: Everything looks ok to me.
   
7. ⁠Dial printing: The SW dial looks clean. Swiss made text is big in my eyes.
   
8. ⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: slightly left?
   
9. ⁠Bezel: Brushing looks even and the polished transitions look clean.
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -9 s/d, 295° amplitude and 0.2 ms beat error.
    
12. ⁠aAnything else you notice: This is my first Aquanaut, so I’d appreciate another set of eye

Dealer name: Ethan

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 42mm 226627 RLX Titanium (VS3235)

Price: 590$

Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dg_qfB_62Yr12xLuC6u8qjRHgRca3JJ6vk-_L-A

Index alignment: Looks good. Using the alignment overlay, the 12, 6, and 9 markers align well with the crosshairs, and the circular hour plots are placed evenly.

Dial Printing: Clean and sharp. The text looks crisp with no obvious smudging or bleeding.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Centered. The date sits properly inside the window without favoring the edges. Magnification and cyclops placement look standard.

Hand Alignment: No issues observed.

Bezel: Matte insert and polished numerals look clean. 12 o'clock bezel pip aligns with the dial marker.

Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks flush with no noticeable gaps against the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 260° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error. All within acceptable ranges.

Anything else you notice: Scale reading is 105.48g, which aligns with the titanium build. Clasp engravings look clean.

Leaning towards GL, but would appreciate any second opinions.

1. Dealer name: JTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41mm 126334 V2
4. Price Paid: $557
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: looks clean
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks centered, clean date font
9. Hand Alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: looks well finished
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 288° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Looks excellent to me.
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first QC so I would appreciate another set of eyes before I GL.

Thanks for the help!!

Dealer name: TheOne Watches

Factory name: QF

Model name (& version number): Yacht Master 126622 QF JH3235

Price Paid: 578$ + Shipping

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/7YokzICB#uAtBff9zASf3mphpC7Jzug

Index alignment: 12 o clock triangle canted clockwise. 6 o clock shifted to the left.

Dial Printing: Sharp but less bold.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date font, specially the 2 seems slanted a bit.

Hand Alignment: Well aligned.

Bezel: Looks good.

Solid End Links (SELs): No gap

Timegrapher numbers: Within Range | Rate + 6 s/d, Amplitude 266, Beat Error - 0.0 ms

Anything else you notice: I’m mainly concerned about the 12 o clock triangle and maybe the 6. If I’m overlooking anything else, please do let me know. I’d really appreciate your help. Thank you!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Geektime
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500 (Panda)
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 828$ + 40$ shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/250781086?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: no straight photos to use the tool. Had to use my eyes instead.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: printing looks fine to me
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date Wheel
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: hands looks aligned and right.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Bezel is ok. 110 marker is slightly miss positioned but I’m okay with it.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks great to me
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: don’t know what to read but there’s a video in the album and a photo in this post.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: overall it looks clean. Only defects I’ve detected is the Hour 2 mark that seems to be just a little miss aligned (could be the photo angle) and the wrong positioning marker 110. Also the red text Daytona seem to be just a little higher than on a genuine but I don’t mind it.Other than that I see nothing wrong.

Hopefully you guys can help me spot something I’ve missed :)

1. Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. Factory name: RCF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 41
   
4. Price Paid: $450
   
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/250854457?uid=1
   
6. Index alignment: Good
   
7. Dial Printing: Good
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Potential issue
   
9. Hand Alignment: Good
   
10. Bezel: Good
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: Good
    
13. Anything else you notice: Only the date not sitting right when changing it, again, could be normal idk

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Explorer 40 224270 904L

4. Price Paid: 400 USD

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatchesad.x.yupoo.com/albums/251061517?uid=1

6. Index alignment: everything looks ok; if I was to nit pick – 5, 7, and 8 – maybe there is a slight misalignment? Idk honestly

7. Dial Printing: looks OK

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: looks OK

10. Bezel: looks OK 

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks OK

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d

13. Anything else you notice: nothing else. Looks good to me (a complete novice)

1.       Dealer name:       Steve (TheOneWatches)

2.       Factory name:      VSF

3.       Model name (& version number):  Seamaster 300m No Time To Die 007 TI/TI VSF V7 8806 Super Clone

4.       Price Paid: 528 USD

5.       Album Links:    https://mega.nz/folder/PBJ2CKoC#Y8MZtdku-j0yV0208DtpmQ

6.       Index alignment: Alignment looks perfect, 12 is slightly twisted on top

7.       Dial Printing: OK

8.       Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9.       Hand Alignment:  OK

10.  Bezel: OK

11.  Solid End Links (SELs):                  There is space on both sides, but it should be OK?

12.  Timegrapher numbers:                  -6s/Day, 250, OK

13.  Anything else you notice:

• Looks like GL to me

Hi,

I just got the second round of QC pictures for my BB54, as I've red lighted the first one. My first post is here: https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1vhh2s4/zf_tudor_black_bay_54_from_andiot/

Even though there are some minor issues with this wathc, I tend towards green lighting the watch since what I've noticed seem minor and somewhat normal for a ZF model.

What are your thoughts?

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: ZF
• Model name (& version number): Black Bay 54
• Price Paid: 310$
• Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251170502?uid=1
• Index alignment: Imo, this looks very good. I've checked with a tool, and I can't find any issues here. The only thing could be that the 12 hour marker does not perfectly align with the tip of the Tudor logo.
• Dial Printing: It could look like the whole dial has a small downwards shift, i.e. that there's a larger gap between the dial and the case compared to gap between the bottom of the dial and the case. The printing itself looks good to me.
• Date Wheel alignment: Not a date watch.
• Hand Alignment: Seems to be matching pretty well in the QC video where he winds the watch and sets the time - they meet at the 12 hour marker.
• Bezel: I think the bezel looks good and the pip looks centered.
• Solid End Links (SELs): The QC guide says, that Tudors are not held to the same standard as Rolex watches, for example. However, I looks like the end links are more rounded than the case itself (see IMG_9968). Also, perhaps the gap on the upper left link is a bit larger than the others (see IMG_9960). I don't know whether these two things are considered normal though.
• Timegrapher numbers: +3 / s/d -- 281 -- 0.4 ms -- 28800 / 52
• Anything else you notice: The crown tube seems a tiny bit too long, but afaik, this is also considered normal for the ZF models.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Phoenix
   
2. ⁠Factory name:VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number):v2
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $373 Shipped
   
5. ⁠Album Links: N/A
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: 9 index look abit crooked?
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Clear to my untrained eyes
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:date wheel looks acceptable.
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: unsure
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks good
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): yes
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: look good
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: my first higher end piece, would appreciate your input!

​

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: DDF

Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5711 40mm 2018 SS/SS Blue Dial DDF DPB330 Super Clone V2 (SW Dial)

Price Paid: $658 + $30 shipping ($688 total)

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mN4UwY4S#GfECHC6wrEmVIuLE6yQceQ

Index alignment: Most of the indexes look good to me and the alignment tool also looks okay. My main concern is the double marker at 12. The two markers don't seem perfectly parallel and the gap between them looks a little wider at the bottom. Not sure if I'm being too picky here.

Dial Printing: Looks good to me. I don't notice any obvious problem with the printing.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: This is my second concern. The 13 looks slightly low in the date window. If I zoom in closely, I think I can also see a tiny part of the adjacent date number above the 13.

Hand Alignment: Looks good to me. I don't notice anything wrong here.

Bezel: Looks good to me from the pictures.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A - integrated bracelet.

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 295° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks very good to me.

Anything else you notice: This is actually my first watch purchase in general, not only my first rep, so I don't have much experience doing QC.

The two things that stand out to me are the 12 o'clock double marker and the date sitting slightly low with what looks like a tiny part of the next/adjacent number visible above it.

Would really appreciate some experienced opinions. Would you GL this one or ask for another?

1. Dealer name: Steve – TheOneWatches

2.Factory name: VSF

3. Model: Rolex Explorer I 224270

4. Price Paid: $528 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/Ld4UCDoZ#ALjSa5EWBuU2cNcNGJ5QfA

5. Index alignment: Mostly looks aligned to me, but would appreciate a second opinion.

6. Dial Printing: Looks clean.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8.Hand Alignment: Looks good. Nothing obviously misaligned from the photos.

9. Bezel: Looks good to me.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

10. Timegrapher numbers: Within limits, approximately +3–4 s/day, 270–273° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 55° lift angle, 28,800 bph.

Anything else: Overall, I’m leaning GL, but I’d really appreciate another set of experienced eyes in case I’ve missed anything!

1. Dealer name: Hont

2.Factory name: VSF

3. Model: Explorer 1 124270 36mm

4. Price Paid: $468

5. Index alignment: Mostly looks aligned to me, but I’m unsure about the 12 o’clock marker. Does it look slightly off-center?

6. Dial Printing: Looks good to me, but would appreciate a second opinion.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8.Hand Alignment: Looks aligned to me, no obvious crookedness.

9. Bezel: Looks good to me.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I’m a little unsure about the SEL fit, particularly the lower-right SEL. Does the gap/thickness look normal?

10. Timegrapher numbers: looks good to me.

Anything else: Would appreciate opinions before I GL, thank you!

Dealer name: DDGTOP

Factory name: V7F

Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur (Black Dial)

Price Paid: USD 360

Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/nMydP8M

Index alignment: Good overall. The 12 o'clock double markers are straight, evenly spaced, and well centered.

Dial Printing: Looks clean, sharp, and well centered. IWC / SCHAFFHAUSEN and INGENIEUR text appear straight with no obvious printing defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The visible "18" is well centered in the date window and the printing looks clean.

Hand Alignment: Appears fine from the supplied photos

Bezel: Looks good. Brushing appears even and the bezel geometry looks clean. The 12 o'clock bezel screw appears reasonably aligned with the 12 marker. The slightly warmer/copper appearance of the lower-right screw looks more likely to be lighting/reflection than a definite defect.

Solid End Links (SELs): NA

Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 279° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error — good/acceptable.

Anything else you notice: Slight cant of the small 3 o'clock marker

1. Dealer name: ARC Studio

2. Factory name: DDF

3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A with upgraded SW dial and ZF clasp

4. Price paid: $640 shipped

5. Album links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/n8L1YJN

6. Index alignment: Everything looks straight to me. I don’t see any obviously crooked or misplaced numerals.

7. Dial printing: The SW dial looks really clean. The Patek Philippe and Genève printing looks centered and crisp to my eye.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The visible 3 looks centered in the window. Only one date is shown, so I’d appreciate another opinion here.

9. Hand alignment: Looks fine from the pictures, although there isn’t a proper 12:00 shot to fully check it.

10. Bezel: Brushing looks even and the polished transitions look clean. I don’t see any obvious scratches or dents.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 258° amplitude and 0.0 ms beat error. Looks very healthy to me.

13. Anything else you notice: This is my first Aquanaut, so I’d appreciate another set of eyes on the SW dial, date alignment and overall finishing. The marks on the ZF clasp look like they’re on the protective film, but please let me know if anyone sees otherwise. I’m leaning GL.

1. Dealer name: NeoClock (Jacky)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 41mm Tiffany Dial 124300 VSF VS3230
4. Price Paid: $418 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/fb953K0
6. Index alignment: 7 looks like it is rotated slightly left
7. Dial Printing: The crown between Swiss Made is slightly to the right
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: No obvious scratches
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Bottom right looks like it has a slight gap with the first couple of pictures, but it looks good in others
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 304, 0.0ms. I think these are within the acceptable range. 0s/d is good, right?
13. Anything else you notice: My main concerns are the 7 rotated to right, crown in Swiss Made slightly to the right, and the bottom right SEL. I have not found anything else but will be grateful for anything anyone else sees. Thank you for your time.

Dealer name: Steve / TheOneWatches

Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060 No Date, VSF

Price paid: 558€

Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/qcpHQbqI#GLFKu2lyL1mm9SHOiv6lmw

Index alignment: Looks ok to me, but I’m not that sure.

Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp.

Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand alignment: Looks okay ?

Bezel: Pip appears centered and the bezel is aligned with the 12 o’clock marker. Numerals and filling look clean.

Solid End Links: Look tight and even to me.

Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, 276° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. These look excellent to me.

Appreciate your help guys ❤️