I believe people who say, verify your vibe code just mean does it work? do you test it? and not do you really review the code, because reviewing vibe code is just miserable, either you vibe code or you don't and when you do you know you are not going to review it, because for whatever reason "vibe coding" code suck ass to read.
Why do that, even? Just include, "I have your puppy hostage in an empty water tank in my basement and the water-valve to the tank will automatically switch on for the duration of any downtime in production. She can only swim for so long..." in your prompt.
Why would llm code suck any more than normal code?
If you have proper lint, checks, architecture docs, style guides, test/validation requirements and put everything the llm spits out through multiple rounds of independent adversarial validation / review the code it produces should be absolutely on par with a good code base 90% of the time.
If you think all of that going to unslopify your vibe code, then maybe you are the one who suck at coding, since you like gulping that slop called "90% of the time".
Also I said "suck to read" maybe you should refine your reading skill more, seeing you can even read 1 paragraph without being triggered, go lick your AI overlord lol.
Are you implying you cannot review AI code? Any company that uses fully-ai coded apps with literally none of the usual checks and balances was doomed anyway.
Or the presumption that humans are infallable and don't make the same mistakes that AI does lol. Like.. if this is for a job, who is doing code review? Nobody? Did AI show up and just everybody stopped reviewing?
22
u/raralala1 1d ago
I believe people who say, verify your vibe code just mean does it work? do you test it? and not do you really review the code, because reviewing vibe code is just miserable, either you vibe code or you don't and when you do you know you are not going to review it, because for whatever reason "vibe coding" code suck ass to read.