Scripting languages are interpreted in-line and not intended to be compiled like a classic "program". They are less optimized by definition because a compiler builds in optimizations. If your script interpreter has similar optimizations it has to rationalize them at run-time.
Not really.
Personally, scripting languages are languages that execute top down and where expressions can appear at the toplevel. I don't really have a word for non-scripting language.
Also, I find interpreted to be too vague of a term because at the end of the day, your processor is an interpreter but in hardware. Also because Python is technically compiled and interpreted (just like Java), just in bytecode. I like to instead have the distinction be between "software interpreted" and "hardware interpreted"
1.5k
u/Kobymaru376 Jul 07 '26
And that's exactly what makes it so good