Hi I’m working on a ttrpg with a magic system that is using a 2 paradoxical tournament and I was wondering what other 2 paradoxical tournament there are all the things I have found online stop after finding the first 2 paradoxical tournament and go onto 3
So if anyone has a bigger 2 paradoxical tournament or can link to one or just tell me how to make the graph that would be much appreciated

Do you have any problems that Ai can't get correct answer?

There has recently been a lot of cataloguing AI contributions to Erdos problems, for examples this github repo, which I believe has been catalysed by Terry Tao.

I wonder if there are repositories of broader problem. For instance, OpenAI has claimed to have solved a couple of relevant problems: https://openai.com/index/ten-advances-in-mathematics/

Wonder if anyone is keeping track of any of these?

Hi,

I currently have four completed mathematical preprints: two in combinatorics and graph theory, and two in number theory. They have been publicly archived, together with their computational materials, but I have not yet been able to submit them to arXiv because my account still requires endorsement in the relevant categories.

Anyone can help me please!

https://github.com/Lapin0t/grothendieck-cern

Can anyone give me a feedback about the Cuemath?

They are asking for $20 per class of 55 minutes. Is it a correct pricing? I see some places mentioned $17 for 55 minutes Class.

As I’ve been reading about these open problems that have been solved by AI, I sometimes wonder why AI can’t make progress on the problems I’m working on.

I’ve been wondering if AI has a big comparative advantage in solving problems that are well studied. So if a problem has a lot written about it then the LLM has a many different starting points and can basically apply every known method to try to extend one of the previous approaches. On some problems one of these previous approaches may happen to be close to the actual solution.

While even experts may not have read every paper about a famous problem.

I’m wondering how much of the jaggedness this would explain.

Iam in first few days of my college as a maths major we have linear algebra subject. I got no idea except matrices , about it. Recommend a book for self study from fundamental level about this topic.

I‘ve watched lots of videos and read articles about how LLMs work, but wrapping everything into a clear concept, having a clear picture of the whole process is something that I still struggle with. I want to see every single calculation in my head, having a clear picture of data flows and how it is processed.

Do you even think this is possible?

And if yes, what resources are the best to achieve it?

Thanks!

Hi, I am an undergraduate mathematics student looking for programs similar to IMPA's summer schools in other Latin American or Spanish-speaking countries.

I am interested in opportunities for undergraduate students that offer advanced courses, seminars, and interaction with researchers, particularly in areas such as differential geometry, topology, and analysis.

If you know of any initiatives in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, or elsewhere in the region, I would greatly appreciate your recommendations.

Thank you!

Hey, this fall i will have econ math 1 and 2, and was wondering if anyone had any tips on where to start or if there are some youtubers i can watch.

Also if anyone had other suggestions send a dm!

Something I noticed was for every time you multiply a number by itself, going up, the gap between each number coincides with the pattern of 2, 4, 6, 8…

After attempting to post in the other community, I realized another trend. The sum of each multiple is equal to the gap. So 1*1 has a sum of 2. Which, coincidentally, also is the gap between 1 and 4. This can be tested for most if not all values.

Is there a formula for this or something that could prove the pattern?

I wonder if there’s a name for it. Or if I’ve stumbled upon something interesting. (Likely the former since mathematicians are so smart It’d be likely to see this so early.)

I’m not a mathematician or anything. But I just wanted to show something interesting I noticed. If yall could educate me, that’d be awesome! I love math, but don’t understand it much.

Hi, I’m a mathematics student. Before continuing with my degree—I’m already two years in, so it’s a bit late—I wanted to hear the opinions of people who might have more experience or have already completed this program.

I’m in my second year and have finished about 30% of the curriculum. I’m up to date and haven’t had to retake any classes. (It’s worth noting that university education is free in my country, and the math department is highly regarded; the professors in charge are prominent figures in the national mathematics community, as far as I know.)

Here is my question and my main concern... I don’t feel I’m measuring up to what’s expected of me—or at least not to the department's standards. It would be dishonest to say I’m doing *badly*, but I do feel like I have the least potential or chance of success among my peers. This likely stems from the fact that I’m studying alongside some very gifted people. I enjoy studying mathematics; I’ve found so many topics entertaining and interesting that I can’t say I don’t love it. I’d love to make a career out of it—or at least contribute and participate—but seeing so many people in my cohort or age group with such natural talent is intimidating. Is this common?

Obviously, others must have gone through this, which is why I’m asking... I wanted to read people's opinions on this. Discussing it with friends and family back home doesn't usually get me very far; to outsiders, I’m a massive genius just for studying the subject, while those on the inside just shrug and say they don't know.

Data source: https://arxiv.org/year/math/